Stallion Free
Cock Encumbered
That undercarriage pic is more embarrassing than anything in both games combined.Ploid 3.0 said::lol Some people here really seem to have some personal issues with PD.
That undercarriage pic is more embarrassing than anything in both games combined.Ploid 3.0 said::lol Some people here really seem to have some personal issues with PD.
Ploid 3.0 said::lol Some people here really seem to have some personal issues with PD.
Graphics Horse said:At least they have an existing relationship with Autoart, so it might not be a big deal.
Amazing.OuterWorldVoice said:
Stallion Free said:That undercarriage pic is more embarrassing than anything in both games combined.
OuterWorldVoice said:Ask yourself, honestly, what you would have typed if the shoe was on the other foot, and this was a Forza model.
Honestly.
Seriously, I can feel the rage in almost every post in this thread. :lol :lol :lolcjelly said:Sandy vaginas.
shinnn said:looks fine to me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18aXwaN2CoY&hd=1
any video showing how PD get the cars sound so crap?
Looks more like some people around here can't take it as well as they dish it out. So basically, this:Ploid 3.0 said::lol Some people here really seem to have some personal issues with PD.
This thread is awesome. :lolOuterWorldVoice said:Ask yourself, honestly, what you would have typed if the shoe was on the other foot, and this was a Forza model.
Honestly.
People seem to be having personal issues with both first party developers :lolPloid 3.0 said::lol Some people here really seem to have some personal issues with PD.
shinnn said:
OuterWorldVoice said:
Anyone with a brain would know both games are exceptional.commedieu said:blablabla
:lolcommedieu said:This is the dumbest thread in the history of dumb threads.
F3 fanboys are going to always pretend F3 is a better game. GT5 Fanboys will know they have the better game.
OuterWorldVoice said:
commedieu said:This is the dumbest thread in the history of dumb threads.
F3 fanboys are going to always pretend F3 is a better game. GT5 Fanboys will know they have the better game. Isn't it simple? GT5's photomode/in game/features/Physics trump Forza. Forza trumps GT when it comes to painting liveries & fantasy modifications with 8 cars in a race. GT will always sell more. Forza will rate higher with a majority folks that start off their review: "Need for Speed Shift..." I mean what is the point of this thread at this point? If you have a choice, its clear GT5 is a better car sim, as reviews do seem to all agree on. And thats whats been advertised in GT. Sales speak for a genre where there are only really 2 competitors. No one showed up for F3 besides a handful of people who couldn't get GT. Spec to Spec, theres no contest. Glitch Vs Glitch, or ugly texture vs ugly texture? This is the silliest thing on earth at this point.
LOL @ the model car texture. WHAT the hell is that about? If the best features of GT5 didn't make up for everything else known to console sim worlds, I'd question PD's work ethic as far as their "perfectionist" tag. However its hard to find only mistakes and use that as the bar..
Again pointless because F3 fanboys of course will pretend that they bought GT5 just for close up photographs of a flipped over car, and not the simulation aspect of a car sim. Are you guys going to start arguing fonts next?
And Forza/Turn10 claimed the replay stills were in game. Which is why people used those shots vs GT5p shots, now all of a sudden theres a clear acknowledgment that Forza3 upgrades the models severely for menu/replay? Yet GT5 only does for photomode? How many times can F3 just not stack up to GT5, and why is it still being debated? Turn10's direction for F3 wasn't widening the genre, or features that the community wanted. It was to get a driving game out as fast as possible so that Microsoft could say they have one on their Xbox360. Its been 3 releases yet no significant upgrades from one to another outside of the original inclusion of decal swapping damage & livery editor. Theres no reason it couldn't do weather/night/pitcrews/rally or any of that. It was just something that wasn't even in the vision for the past 3 games.
Blah, continue to argue. But amazingly silly thread. Its summed up with "LOL LOok at this GT5 mistake! Its on par with Turn10's final product!"
yes. over analysing stupid details that no one will able to see in game seems pointless.OuterWorldVoice said:Ask yourself, honestly, what you would have typed if the shoe was on the other foot, and this was a Forza model.
Honestly.
commedieu said:This is the dumbest thread in the history of dumb threads.
F3 fanboys are going to always pretend F3 is a better game. GT5 Fanboys will know they have the better game. Isn't it simple? GT5's photomode/in game/features/Physics trump Forza. Forza trumps GT when it comes to painting liveries & fantasy modifications with 8 cars in a race. GT will always sell more. Forza will rate higher with a majority folks that start off their review: "Need for Speed Shift..." I mean what is the point of this thread at this point? If you have a choice, its clear GT5 is a better car sim, as reviews do seem to all agree on. And thats whats been advertised in GT. Sales speak for a genre where there are only really 2 competitors. No one showed up for F3 besides a handful of people who couldn't get GT. Spec to Spec, theres no contest. Glitch Vs Glitch, or ugly texture vs ugly texture? This is the silliest thing on earth at this point.
LOL @ the model car texture. WHAT the hell is that about? If the best features of GT5 didn't make up for everything else known to console sim worlds, I'd question PD's work ethic as far as their "perfectionist" tag. However its hard to find only mistakes and use that as the bar..
Again pointless because F3 fanboys of course will pretend that they bought GT5 just for close up photographs of a flipped over car, and not the simulation aspect of a car sim. Are you guys going to start arguing fonts next?
And Forza/Turn10 claimed the replay stills were in game. Which is why people used those shots vs GT5p shots, now all of a sudden theres a clear acknowledgment that Forza3 upgrades the models severely for menu/replay? Yet GT5 only does for photomode? How many times can F3 just not stack up to GT5, and why is it still being debated? Turn10's direction for F3 wasn't widening the genre, or features that the community wanted. It was to get a driving game out as fast as possible so that Microsoft could say they have one on their Xbox360. Its been 3 releases yet no significant upgrades from one to another outside of the original inclusion of decal swapping damage & livery editor. Theres no reason it couldn't do weather/night/pitcrews/rally or any of that. It was just something that wasn't even in the vision for the past 3 games.
Blah, continue to argue. But amazingly silly thread. Its summed up with "LOL LOok at this GT5 mistake! Its on par with Turn10's final product!"
commedieu said:Everyone should go back to the start of the thread and look at my posts there.
commedieu said:This is the dumbest thread in the history of dumb threads.
F3 fanboys are going to always pretend F3 is a better game. GT5 Fanboys will know they have the better game. Isn't it simple? GT5's photomode/in game/features/Physics trump Forza. Forza trumps GT when it comes to painting liveries & fantasy modifications with 8 cars in a race. GT will always sell more. Forza will rate higher with a majority folks that start off their review: "Need for Speed Shift..." I mean what is the point of this thread at this point? If you have a choice, its clear GT5 is a better car sim, as reviews do seem to all agree on. And thats whats been advertised in GT. Sales speak for a genre where there are only really 2 competitors. No one showed up for F3 besides a handful of people who couldn't get GT. Spec to Spec, theres no contest. Glitch Vs Glitch, or ugly texture vs ugly texture? This is the silliest thing on earth at this point.
LOL @ the model car texture. WHAT the hell is that about? If the best features of GT5 didn't make up for everything else known to console sim worlds, I'd question PD's work ethic as far as their "perfectionist" tag. However its hard to find only mistakes and use that as the bar..
Again pointless because F3 fanboys of course will pretend that they bought GT5 just for close up photographs of a flipped over car, and not the simulation aspect of a car sim. Are you guys going to start arguing fonts next?
And Forza/Turn10 claimed the replay stills were in game. Which is why people used those shots vs GT5p shots, now all of a sudden theres a clear acknowledgment that Forza3 upgrades the models severely for menu/replay? Yet GT5 only does for photomode? How many times can F3 just not stack up to GT5, and why is it still being debated? Turn10's direction for F3 wasn't widening the genre, or features that the community wanted. It was to get a driving game out as fast as possible so that Microsoft could say they have one on their Xbox360. Its been 3 releases yet no significant upgrades from one to another outside of the original inclusion of decal swapping damage & livery editor. Theres no reason it couldn't do weather/night/pitcrews/rally or any of that. It was just something that wasn't even in the vision for the past 3 games.
Blah, continue to argue. But amazingly silly thread. Its summed up with "LOL LOok at this GT5 mistake! Its on par with Turn10's final product!"
I love how you follow up the first sentence with the second.commedieu said:This is the dumbest thread in the history of dumb threads.
F3 fanboys are going to always pretend F3 is a better game. GT5 Fanboys will know they have the better game.
commedieu said:This is the dumbest thread in the history of dumb threads.
F3 fanboys are going to always pretend F3 is a better game. GT5 Fanboys will know they have the better game. Isn't it simple? GT5's photomode/in game/features/Physics trump Forza. Forza trumps GT when it comes to painting liveries & fantasy modifications with 8 cars in a race. GT will always sell more. Forza will rate higher with a majority folks that start off their review: "Need for Speed Shift..." I mean what is the point of this thread at this point? If you have a choice, its clear GT5 is a better car sim, as reviews do seem to all agree on. And thats whats been advertised in GT. Sales speak for a genre where there are only really 2 competitors. No one showed up for F3 besides a handful of people who couldn't get GT. Spec to Spec, theres no contest. Glitch Vs Glitch, or ugly texture vs ugly texture? This is the silliest thing on earth at this point.
LOL @ the model car texture. WHAT the hell is that about? If the best features of GT5 didn't make up for everything else known to console sim worlds, I'd question PD's work ethic as far as their "perfectionist" tag. However its hard to find only mistakes and use that as the bar..
Again pointless because F3 fanboys of course will pretend that they bought GT5 just for close up photographs of a flipped over car, and not the simulation aspect of a car sim. Are you guys going to start arguing fonts next?
And Forza/Turn10 claimed the replay stills were in game. Which is why people used those shots vs GT5p shots, now all of a sudden theres a clear acknowledgment that Forza3 upgrades the models severely for menu/replay? Yet GT5 only does for photomode? How many times can F3 just not stack up to GT5, and why is it still being debated? Turn10's direction for F3 wasn't widening the genre, or features that the community wanted. It was to get a driving game out as fast as possible so that Microsoft could say they have one on their Xbox360. Its been 3 releases yet no significant upgrades from one to another outside of the original inclusion of decal swapping damage & livery editor. Theres no reason it couldn't do weather/night/pitcrews/rally or any of that. It was just something that wasn't even in the vision for the past 3 games.
Blah, continue to argue. But amazingly silly thread. Its summed up with "LOL LOok at this GT5 mistake! Its on par with Turn10's final product!"
commedieu said:This is the dumbest thread in the history of dumb threads.
F3 fanboys are going to always pretend F3 is a better game. GT5 Fanboys will know they have the better game. Isn't it simple? GT5's photomode/in game/features/Physics trump Forza. Forza trumps GT when it comes to painting liveries & fantasy modifications with 8 cars in a race. GT will always sell more. Forza will rate higher with a majority folks that start off their review: "Need for Speed Shift..." I mean what is the point of this thread at this point? If you have a choice, its clear GT5 is a better car sim, as reviews do seem to all agree on. And thats whats been advertised in GT. Sales speak for a genre where there are only really 2 competitors. No one showed up for F3 besides a handful of people who couldn't get GT. Spec to Spec, theres no contest. Glitch Vs Glitch, or ugly texture vs ugly texture? This is the silliest thing on earth at this point.
LOL @ the model car texture. WHAT the hell is that about? If the best features of GT5 didn't make up for everything else known to console sim worlds, I'd question PD's work ethic as far as their "perfectionist" tag. However its hard to find only mistakes and use that as the bar..
Again pointless because F3 fanboys of course will pretend that they bought GT5 just for close up photographs of a flipped over car, and not the simulation aspect of a car sim. Are you guys going to start arguing fonts next?
And Forza/Turn10 claimed the replay stills were in game. Which is why people used those shots vs GT5p shots, now all of a sudden theres a clear acknowledgment that Forza3 upgrades the models severely for menu/replay? Yet GT5 only does for photomode? How many times can F3 just not stack up to GT5, and why is it still being debated? Turn10's direction for F3 wasn't widening the genre, or features that the community wanted. It was to get a driving game out as fast as possible so that Microsoft could say they have one on their Xbox360. Its been 3 releases yet no significant upgrades from one to another outside of the original inclusion of decal swapping damage & livery editor. Theres no reason it couldn't do weather/night/pitcrews/rally or any of that. It was just something that wasn't even in the vision for the past 3 games.
Blah, continue to argue. But amazingly silly thread. Its summed up with "LOL LOok at this GT5 mistake! Its on par with Turn10's final product!"
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lolsdornan said:
Stallion Free said:I love how you follow up the first sentence with the second.
commedieu said:This is the dumbest thread in the history of dumb threads.
F3 fanboys are going to always pretend F3 is a better game. GT5 Fanboys will know they have the better game. Isn't it simple? GT5's photomode/in game/features/Physics trump Forza. Forza trumps GT when it comes to painting liveries & fantasy modifications with 8 cars in a race. GT will always sell more. Forza will rate higher with a majority folks that start off their review: "Need for Speed Shift..." I mean what is the point of this thread at this point? If you have a choice, its clear GT5 is a better car sim, as reviews do seem to all agree on. And thats whats been advertised in GT. Sales speak for a genre where there are only really 2 competitors. No one showed up for F3 besides a handful of people who couldn't get GT. Spec to Spec, theres no contest. Glitch Vs Glitch, or ugly texture vs ugly texture? This is the silliest thing on earth at this point.
LOL @ the model car texture. WHAT the hell is that about? If the best features of GT5 didn't make up for everything else known to console sim worlds, I'd question PD's work ethic as far as their "perfectionist" tag. However its hard to find only mistakes and use that as the bar..
Again pointless because F3 fanboys of course will pretend that they bought GT5 just for close up photographs of a flipped over car, and not the simulation aspect of a car sim. Are you guys going to start arguing fonts next?
And Forza/Turn10 claimed the replay stills were in game. Which is why people used those shots vs GT5p shots, now all of a sudden theres a clear acknowledgment that Forza3 upgrades the models severely for menu/replay? Yet GT5 only does for photomode? How many times can F3 just not stack up to GT5, and why is it still being debated? Turn10's direction for F3 wasn't widening the genre, or features that the community wanted. It was to get a driving game out as fast as possible so that Microsoft could say they have one on their Xbox360. Its been 3 releases yet no significant upgrades from one to another outside of the original inclusion of decal swapping damage & livery editor. Theres no reason it couldn't do weather/night/pitcrews/rally or any of that. It was just something that wasn't even in the vision for the past 3 games.
Blah, continue to argue. But amazingly silly thread. Its summed up with "LOL LOok at this GT5 mistake! Its on par with Turn10's final product!"
High quality trolling.REMEMBER CITADEL said:
its not debatable imo.REMEMBER CITADEL said:Well, that's true, GT5 destroys Forza 3 in almost every respect. In fact, GT5 will trump Forza 4 & 5 as well.
Pepto said:
Stallion Free said:its not debatable imo.
Che hacked into Frank's account. :lolOuterWorldVoice said:
I disagree with the guy on the right saying how the GT series has always been ahead in terms of physics.Pepto said:
REMEMBER CITADEL said:Well, that's true, GT5 destroys Forza 3 in almost every respect. In fact, GT5 will trump Forza 4 & 5 as well.
Alex Roy is a fucking god and I didn't know he works for FastLaneDaily now so I'll blindly go with every single thing he says.Pepto said: