Wow, that's pretty funny.Zezboob said:Already posted ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL4acUz4nJw
Or maybe I finally have the opportunity to add fuel to the flames too !
The pilots acts as if nothing strange is going on.....lol
Wow, that's pretty funny.Zezboob said:Already posted ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL4acUz4nJw
Or maybe I finally have the opportunity to add fuel to the flames too !
Lol some of the YouTube commentsZezboob said:Already posted ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL4acUz4nJw
Or maybe I finally have the opportunity to add fuel to the flames too !
Lambo........for all of your car transport needs!
CALL 1-800-555-LAMBO For all your towing and service hauling needs!
Gravel loads now ON-SALE!!!
You should still do it, it is this thread.Haunted said:It was obvious to everyone but the most delusional fanboys. If I'd care more, I'd collect some posts from a couple pages back.
You could almost smell the conviction in that postbrotkasten said:This one is more than enough.
Zezboob said:Already posted ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL4acUz4nJw
Or maybe I finally have the opportunity to add fuel to the flames too !
One person said WELL IT'S RUSTED SO... EASTER EGG! And everyone else ran with it :lolStallion Free said:Lol so it wasn't some inside joke. How many people made that excuse here?
skybaby said:One person said WELL IT'S RUSTED SO... EASTER EGG! And everyone else ran with it :lol
This. Anyone saying I'm against post-release support has massive problems with reading comprehension. I love post-release support, but not when it's to fix (or add) features in a game because they're broken when the game is gold. You should be able to play a game with all advertised features and no patches from the get go... as I recall, GT5 didn't even have online play out of the box (correct me if I'm wrong though).brotkasten said:To be honest, GT5 feels like a public beta for an MMO. Except it's post-launch and you already paid the 60 bucks. Things are missing, won't be there and are only halfway included. It's definitely not what I expected from PD.
Zezboob said:Already posted ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL4acUz4nJw
Or maybe I finally have the opportunity to add fuel to the flames too !
Forza 3 doesn't feel incomplete with 8 cars at once or no weather. Never at one point did I think "shit, this game doesn't feel finished at all". Have had that feeling several times while playing GT5.kevm3 said:So Kaz actually caring enough to add features that he could've completely omitted is showing a lack of effort and gives the game a beta feel? So if Turn 10 decided later to add weather or 16 cars, that would all of a sudden give the game a beta-ish feel.
kevm3 said:
The second one was already postedkevm3 said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQgbM6OImgo&feature=related
Magic Carpet simulator confirmed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SjNxr7s64s&feature=related
brotkasten said:To be honest, GT5 feels like a public beta for an MMO. Except it's post-launch and you already paid the 60 bucks. Things are missing, won't be there and are only halfway included. It's definitely not what I expected from PD.
Sorry Mr. first-to-run-with-itMetalmurphy said:Actually, one person said that the rest of the textures had nothing to do with the model car and were from the real thing.
Tiny lil difference.
Took all my strength not to post a smarmy comment there about how there's no way you could tell what the inside of a Veyron looks like just from GT5 because it's a standard car.weekend_warrior said:That doesn't make any sense. Of course someone could make a faster car, people make cars that go 800mph. That's not the point of the Veyron. The point of the Veyron was to make the most desirable car in the world, achieving the highest top speed in a production car was merely one part of that goal. You don't make an interior that looks like this if all you care about is speed.
Both sides are being ridiculously stupid. Best trainwreck on GAF by far!Ploid 3.0 said:You sure showed him.
I'm on the side of whatever allows me to put my superior wit on display. I may not always "win" but I'm having an arseload of funXiaNaphryz said:Both sides are being ridiculously stupid. Best trainwreck on GAF by far!
Shaneus said:I'm on the side of whatever allows me to put my superior wit on display. I may not always "win" but I'm having an arseload of fun
The GT5 thread? Really? I thought it was ultra-sensitive regarding any remotely smartarse comments that wouldn't be considered "constructive/valid criticism". Guess I was wrong.Ploid 3.0 said:The reply wouldn't have been out of place there. It's true.
You're really being silly now. I put that nicely.Shaneus said:This was posted in the GT5 OT:
Took all my strength not to post a smarmy comment there about how there's no way you could tell what the inside of a Veyron looks like just from GT5 because it's a standard car.
So I posted it here instead :lol
CrushDance said:You're really being silly now. I put that nicely.
Now? :lolCrushDance said:You're really being silly now. I put that nicely.
You can can count the number of people who've played Forza in this thread with two hands. Perhaps one hand.Shaneus said:Forza 3 doesn't feel incomplete with 8 cars at once or no weather. Never at one point did I think "shit, this game doesn't feel finished at all". Have had that feeling several times while playing GT5.
Have you played Forza 3?
Shaneus said:The GT5 thread? Really? I thought it was ultra-sensitive regarding any remotely smartarse comments that wouldn't be considered "constructive/valid criticism". Guess I was wrong.
Sounds suicidal.Ploid 3.0 said:Well if your intentions aren't pure... I guess it wasn't meant for there. Thinking about throwing lit matches in there?
Shaneus said:Forza 3 doesn't feel incomplete with 8 cars at once or no weather. Never at one point did I think "shit, this game doesn't feel finished at all". Have had that feeling several times while playing GT5.
Have you played Forza 3?
kevm3 said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQgbM6OImgo&feature=related
Magic Carpet simulator confirmed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SjNxr7s64s&feature=related
I thought it was a premium car that you had to unlock...Shaneus said:This was posted in the GT5 OT:
Took all my strength not to post a smarmy comment there about how there's no way you could tell what the inside of a Veyron looks like just from GT5 because it's a standard car.
So I posted it here instead :lol
According to Gran Turismo 5 designer Kazunori Yamauchi, the developers collaborated with AUTOArt, receiving "materials" of older models' undersides. "That's a vestige," Yamauchi adds via Twitter.
AUTOArt make extremely detailed model cars that fetch over $100 for one car. As previously mentioned, AutoArt models were spotted throughout the offices of Polyphony, the game's studio. Kotaku Japan wonders if Polyphony Digital forgot to erase the AUTOArt logo?
"It (the logo) is interesting," Yamauchi tweets. "But it will be erased in the next update." The reason for this? "Because it's embarrassing."
BUT IT'S AN EASTER EGG. Duh.Zombie James said:
Angst said:Yeah, that logo on the underside of the car made me return the game to the store. I had fun driving, but when Kotaku told me about the toy car logo I just couldn't enjoy the game any longer. So long GT5. I'll buy again when the logo is gone.
Blame! said::lol i dont think anyone questions the game's fun but all the people saying polyphone are untouchable gods are now eating crow stew.
I love Gran Turismo. Do I think everything is perfect? Nope. Would I like PD to refine and rethink some things (shortcuts in the UI, damage, credits in online etc)? You bet.REMEMBER CITADEL said:They're not eating crow because of the AUTOart logo - there seem to be more serious issues with GT5 than scanned undercarriages - but the whole incident nicely illustrates absurd lengths GT fanboys will sometimes go to defend their favorite series. It's not a bug, it's a feature! Kaz is God, you just can't comprehend His greatness, and you don't understand the philosophy of Gran Turismo so your pointing out of the game's painfully obvious flaws doesn't count (cue a bunch of lols and emoticons meant to express their clear intellectual superiority).
Even if this did turn out to be an easter egg, the point would still stand. It's come to that point where you can be embarrassed of liking the series just because of other people who like it.
Mind you, there are similar people in practically every community, but in my experience, Gran Turismo seems to attract lunatics more strongly than most other franchises (and some of them are highly respected, even among more reasonable fans). I guess it comes with popularity, longevity and prestige.
These ''lunatics'' you speak about are in every group.REMEMBER CITADEL said:They're not eating crow because of the AUTOart logo - there seem to be more serious issues with GT5 than scanned undercarriages - but the whole incident nicely illustrates absurd lengths GT fanboys will sometimes go to defend their favorite series. It's not a bug, it's a feature! Kaz is God, you just can't comprehend His greatness, and you don't understand the philosophy of Gran Turismo so your pointing out of the game's painfully obvious flaws doesn't count (cue a bunch of lols and emoticons meant to express their clear intellectual superiority).
Even if this did turn out to be an easter egg, the point would still stand. It's come to that point where you can be embarrassed of liking the series just because of other people who like it.
Mind you, there are similar people in practically every community, but in my experience, Gran Turismo seems to attract lunatics more strongly than most other franchises (and some of them are highly respected, even among more reasonable fans). I guess it comes with popularity, longevity and prestige.
I don't blame some of the more devoted fans going off the deep end. Enduring years of waiting and hype will do that.REMEMBER CITADEL said:They're not eating crow because of the AUTOart logo - there seem to be more serious issues with GT5 than scanned undercarriages - but the whole incident nicely illustrates absurd lengths GT fanboys will sometimes go to defend their favorite series. It's not a bug, it's a feature! Kaz is God, you just can't comprehend His greatness, and you don't understand the philosophy of Gran Turismo so your pointing out of the game's painfully obvious flaws doesn't count (cue a bunch of lols and emoticons meant to express their clear intellectual superiority).
Even if this did turn out to be an easter egg, the point would still stand. It's come to that point where you can be embarrassed of liking the series just because of other people who like it.
Mind you, there are similar people in practically every community, but in my experience, Gran Turismo seems to attract lunatics more strongly than most other franchises (and some of them are highly respected, even among more reasonable fans). I guess it comes with popularity, longevity and prestige.
In this battle, I don't think it's MS that missed out... I think it's you. No lol.Angst said:Bottom line - Microsoft's stupid decision cost them one console sale. :lol
...Metalmurphy said:Actually, one person said that the rest of the textures had nothing to do with the model car and were from the real thing.
Tiny lil difference.
Apex said:It's obvious a PD joke, like they did with Nessy and the Monkey...
CozMick said:E A S T E R E G G
Metalmurphy said:He just put the proof in front of your eyes and you ignore it and post that?...
Angst said:I found out I couldn't use my Logitech wheel. So in that case I had to buy another, very expensive wheel and just couldn't justify it
Yeah. And that those standards weren't met.beast786 said:All that shows is that you have higher standard for GT5.
rvy said:Yeah. And that those standards weren't met.
Exceeded every other driving game out there? :lolCozMick said:But exceeded every other driving game out there, which is the point of the thread.
Wrong in what? I never said it was an easter egg... Maybe you should read posts more carefully. I just noted that it was very obvious, considering the proof right in front of your eyes, that most of it was NOT from a model car. For all I know it could have just been a placeholder that was forgotten.plagiarize said:you know, you could apologize to me for being wrong and for inferring i was a fanboy for not accepting the 'proof' of it being an easter egg that was apparently put right in front of me.
or you could keep spouting revisionist bullshit that anyone can check by just reading back a few pages.
someone posted a supposed flaw in GT5. someone said it was obviously a joke and posted a few pictures that in no way proved that it was obviously a joke.
i didn't accept that it was obviously a joke and got insulted for that. we now have actual proof that it wasn't a joke and here you are insisting that no one ever claimed otherwise?
when we'd argued about it? when i'd said that I wasn't claiming to know what the devs intentions were? when I wasn't the one claiming to know one way or another why that logo was there?
eat your crow and move on.
MarshMellow96 said:Okay so GT5 is really bad, but still better than any other driving game?
Metalmurphy said:smh...
There's no way that you can say shit like this with a straight face. There's just no way. Turn10 didn't have 6 years to make Forza 3 btw.CozMick said:But exceeded every other driving game out there, which is the point of the thread.
There is. If you really feel that the driving model in GT5 is the best ever in a console game, and you consider the driving model the most important part of the game, so much so that it outweighs all other faults, you could easily say it with a straight face, and mean it. If your priorities lie in the variety of events or quality of photo-mode or ability to collect 8 million cars, you could say it and mean it.rvy said:There's no way that you can say shit like this with a straight face. There's just no way. Turn10 didn't have 6 years to make Forza 3 btw.