In such a small rural area I am sure any gay couple who wanted a license has gotten it during the mania of her in jail. It might be a long while till another comes in I suppose. Long after this falls out of the news.
They said she was in there for 6 days.
I don't want to see this woman in jail indefinitely. I respect that she is principled.
I do not respect her principles though and nor should I have to. I'm fine with the rules being changed to appease her so long as people wanting to get married can stroll into where she works and without jumping through any idiotic hoops, leave with a marriage license.
Gonna ask my niece that question..she was born with it, thanks to her father. She was clearly complicit. That hetero bastard..Nice sign back there...
Only God can judge her? I think not, I'm totally judging her right now.
Gonna ask my niece that question..she was born with it, thanks to her father. She was clearly complicit. That hetero bastard..
Only God can judge her? I think not, I'm totally judging her right now.
And here's an updated version from 2008 onward that's probably reflective of the electoral map until the Republican party stops advertising itself as Jesusland and Canada gets its shit together again--
his judgement is the only one that matters
I agree. I am just saying due to how small this county is it may be a very long time before we see whether she follows the judges orders when he released her. And by that point this will be long out of national news potentially so we may never know nationally how it played it out.
Well, she's 4 husbands deep in judgment at the moment.
And I saw her making googly eyes at Huckabee...
She was ordered to issue licences, there aren't many jobs where you can be hired/elected to do something and then told not to interfere with someone else who will do your job for you when you claim it is against whatever faith you hold.
She is being paid $80k to defy the supreme court and disregard whatever parts of the constitution she doesn't agree with.
Survivor frontman Frankie Sullivan is outraged Mike Huckabee carted out the freshly-freed Rowan County clerk Kim Davis to their song, "Eye of the Tiger," and we've learned the group is now considering a lawsuit.
A sobbing Davis appeared in Grayson, Kentucky, arm-in-arm with Huckabee, as the song roared through the loud speakers.
The group is hedging on its plan of attack, but the band's rep tells us they are determined to protect the integrity of their music.
Huckabee obviously didn't hear about the whole "Rockin' in a Free World" thing.
Survivor frontman Frankie Sullivan apparently doesn't want to be associated with Huckabee or Davis..
http://www.tmz.com/2015/09/08/kim-davis-eye-of-the-tiger-survivor-mike-huckabee-rally/
HA!
Gonna ask my niece that question..she was born with it, thanks to her father. She was clearly complicit. That hetero bastard..
Survivor frontman Frankie Sullivan apparently doesn't want to be associated with Huckabee or Davis..
http://www.tmz.com/2015/09/08/kim-davis-eye-of-the-tiger-survivor-mike-huckabee-rally/
HA!
Yeah. The greatest..fuck that kid.God doesn't differentiate between individuals in a blood line when it comes to sin and punishment. Sins of ancestors affect everyone down the line. "Sins of the father" and such. Religion is great isn't it?
Virtually the only music Republican candidates can use without seriously pissing off the artists is country music. And Meat Loaf.
Remember how pissed off Heart was when the McCain campaign was using "Barracuda" at Palin events? That was amusing.
We're at the point where as soon as I hear music at a GOP rally, part of my mind wonders about the rights, haha..
his judgement is the only one that matters
One shot
Everything rides on to-night
Even if I got three strikes, Imma go for it
This moment, we own it.
The judgement of random people on the internet is worth about as much as the judgement of of a crazy person in an insane asylum. They could be right, but with their track record you stopped listening to them a long time ago.
It still sets a bad example to let someone defy rulings that go all the way to the Supreme Court, while denying subordinates willing to perform the duty the opportunity.
They shouldn't change the rules to appease her, even if they could - she's been asked to perform a legal task by every level of court in the land, so she needs to do what she's legally obligated to do. If she allows subordinates to perform the duty without interference then I'd consider that to be acceptable, but the legislature should dock her pay by an amount proportional to the time she normally spends on processing marriage licenses. That won't happen, of course - she's probably got more support than opposition in their state legislature anyway.
I think some punishment is warranted. I just can't agree to 'prison until she agrees to resign or sign the licenses' and then justify her indefinite imprisonment with 'well she obviously *wants* to make a martyr out of her self'.
I can't know if she is a bigot who was attracted to a denomination she could hide behind, or a true believer of what her church spouts.
But in my eyes, once you start talking about 'they shouldn't change the rules to appease her' you start sounding bitter. There is an issue if you are locking someone up indefinitely because they find it impossible to go against their religious beliefs. In this case that issue is very simply solved by changing a law below the federal level.
I don't care if she walks away feeling like she won or not, so long as people can get marriage licenses. If I knew her personally and felt her to be excusing her bigotry with religion I might feel different.
But that's between her and her God.
We *know* that people will literally choose death over renouncing their religious beliefs.
And we know that there is an issue when there is nothing the court can do but put her in prison over this. It's not the sort of crap you should be throwing people in prison for.
I firmly believe in separation of church and state, and Kim Davis should definitely ask herself if she can work for the state when she puts religious law over federal law... but there is no law that can *force* her to make that choice currently.
If Kim Davis's local church didn't happen to push this stuff, maybe this never happens. Neither of us can weigh that up. If 20% of the people who used to be against gay marriage ten years ago are now for it, were they hateful people using their religious beliefs to excuse their bigotry? Or were they just people taken in by what was being preached from the pulpit.
And what's being preached from the pulpit will change. It might take a while, but it will change. The death blow has been struck on this issue. There will be push back. There will be clawing of teeth. There will be the agonizingly slow drawn out death rattle... whether we put Kim Davis in prison or not.
You want to keep martyring her and sending more and more people rushing to her defence? You want to make it a regular fixture of stump speeches for someone who could just be one Democratic Party scandal away from the white house?
Knock yourself out. Tying your self to your principles, no matter what... doesn't sit well on Kim or anyone else. Religious freedom is hugely important to me as an atheist. Just as people ask of the religious 'Would you be okay with Kim Davis if she was a Sunni refusing to help someone that wasn't wearing a hijab?' I can ask you 'Would you be happy to see someone thrown in jail for their Atheism, or Judaism?'.
I'm not okay with either... and I'm not okay with how much support the so called 'religious freedom laws' which are anything but, have bolstered as a result of all this.
Let her not have to sign the licenses. Make it so that they have to have someone there who will whenever she is working. Let people get their marriage licenses from wherever, whenever. I'd have zero expectation as a straight person that I could march into a town hall and demand for any specific person to sign the license. But I should be able to go into any town hall and get a signed license.
If you can swallow 'Kim Davis getting what she wants' there are ways to ensure that people can get married, and that people can still feel free to attend Church's like the one she does. And you can take solace knowing which direction the country is headed and the picture history will paint.
Putting her in prison has let her draw parallels between herself and Rosa Parks and MLK. We didn't put the bus driver in prison for demanding Rosa Parks move. Nor did we put the CEO of the bus company in prison for it.
It didn't save their reputations and it didn't prevent the civil rights movement from marching forwards.
What Davis wants is to ban gay marriage. Spending time and money to rewrite local law to appease a bigot will only strengthen her resolve. Giving into her delusions will make her even more intractable and cause her to become the beacon of hope to all those that also want to bam gay marriage.
So no, I completely disagree with you. She should continue to be jailed if continues to refuse to do her job.
The latest poll from Rasmussen out this morning shows that the public is against her, 66-26.
She can grandstand and attempt to draw all the civil rights parallels she wants. Thus far, after all of this media coverage, it is not working - the general public is not buying the sob story she's selling.
But she was up 1 - 0 when the polled Jesus.
You have no proof that she is a bigot.
I know that her imprisonment has brought more people rallying to her cause.
You see a bad person with bad beliefs and you want to see them punished. I don't care how many beacons of hope people who want gay marriage banned have. I want gay marriage to remain legal. Making it so that Kim Davis no longer has sole authority over who can get marriage licenses in her jurisdiction *facilitates* marriages. Just let it go.
Maybe she's a bigot. Maybe she's just a religious nut. Whatever.
We don't need more people in jail for frivolous reasons, and it's been rather odd seeing so many of my fellow liberals suddenly drop that valid goal. Stop looking at it punitively. That is how conservatives look at things. Look at it from a social perspective.
Get this woman out of the news and get the marriage licenses flowing.
You have no proof that she is a bigot.
She chose jail over allowing gay marriages to go forward. I'm not sure what more you're looking for.You have no proof that she is a bigot.
You have no proof that she is a bigot.
I know that her imprisonment has brought more people rallying to her cause.
You see a bad person with bad beliefs and you want to see them punished. I don't care how many beacons of hope people who want gay marriage banned have. I want gay marriage to remain legal. Making it so that Kim Davis no longer has sole authority over who can get marriage licenses in her jurisdiction *facilitates* marriages. Just let it go.
Maybe she's a bigot. Maybe she's just a religious nut. Whatever.
We don't need more people in jail for frivolous reasons, and it's been rather odd seeing so many of my fellow liberals suddenly drop that valid goal. Stop looking at it punitively. That is how conservatives look at things. Look at it from a social perspective.
Get this woman out of the news and get the marriage licenses flowing.