Could be I'm just misreading people. Maybe I'm also just being a bit of a gadfly (or, 'troll' as internet peeps 'wanna call it) since it's obvious there's no conundrum in my statement. But I have to disagree somewhat with the bolded. To me, it should be the other way around. I evaluate music the same way I would evaluate any other good - by its value. Not just its value as pure art - but as a good with lasting utility, with aims and means to combat obsolescence.
Lyricism attracts me just as much as vanguard content. Ideal hip hop, for me, is both, working in harmony. Fashawn makes a lot disposable stuff, IMO. 'Ode to Illmatic' is anything but, because its foundation lies upon a symbol that reflects upon itself and rap fans and will continue to do so for a very long time in hip hop culture (hip hop at least). On top of this, it's something I haven't seen done before.
IMO, any song I can get tired of is ultimately not very good. This is why the Def Jux movement means so much to me (particularly Ace, El-P and Cannibal Ox). There's Ace songs that I've listened to on a regular basis for years, at least a few times a day, and they have renewed significance as time passes largely due to the clever and indirect expression of abstract ideas.
This is very similar to how an obscure painting can hold significance to its owner for innumerable years.
I've stated this before - I marvel at how some of you can consume so many different artists' music, daily. You either have an incomprehensible appreciation for hip hop, or are truly scatter-brained - it can't all speak to you on the same level. Hence, most of it must be disposable. Most of hip hop, to me, is just that. Fashawn qualifies, hence my statement about him.
Don't want to come across as a pretentious jerk, but I'd really like to see this thread become more than just a sprinkling of links and album cover GIFs. Surely talk about the genre is worth more than that.