Andrew Korenchkin
Member
Where's Anthony to rave about the bangers that constitute Views?
I like the album but I think this is Cole's biggest fault.
Whether in arrogance or just unaware of criticisms, Cole's albums could be much better if he had outside help.
With these last two albums Cole seems like he is trying to come off as a discount Lupe Fiasco. He wants to make these artistic "raw" projects but can't seem to fit everything together. The concepts are there, the lyrics are there, but the production is weak and the singing is poor.
I still think his latest project is solid but I definitely can understand lots of the criticisms people have about it.
Because loyal to yourself and you will never lose your fan base.Cole projected to do 400-500k FW
WOW, Cole is bigger than Abel.
Cole projected to do 400-500k FW
WOW, Cole is bigger than Abel.
Apparently, Quavo was on .WAV radio and confirmed a Quavo X Travis Scott tape.
As someone on KTT put it, it's looking like this:
Migos album (real soon)
Migos Tour
Quavo & Scott collab
Quavo solo album
Have you listened to 44 Bars?Listened to Logic's Under Pressure.
This guy is not worth paying attention to. At least I tried it, but yeah Logic is corny and mediocre.
Have you listened to 44 Bars?
I don't like Logic but that song is great and the beat is one of the best of the year.
Apparently, Quavo was on .WAV radio and confirmed a Quavo X Travis Scott tape.
As someone on KTT put it, it's looking like this:
Migos album (real soon)
Migos Tour
Quavo & Scott collab
Quavo solo album
Listened to Logic's Under Pressure.
This guy is not worth paying attention to. At least I tried it, but yeah Logic is corny and mediocre.
I'm about to download this dope ass album and I see all these choices for file types. What's the differences between them and which is supposed to sound the best?
What are the file types?
MP3 V0 - 71.3MB
MP3 320 - 86.6MB
FLAC - 275.9MB
AAC - 42.4MB
Ogg Vorbis - 52.3MB
ALAC - 280.3MB
WAV - 379.1MB
AIFF - 379.6MB
Depends.MP3 V0 - 71.3MB
MP3 320 - 86.6MB
FLAC - 275.9MB
AAC - 42.4MB
Ogg Vorbis - 52.3MB
ALAC - 280.3MB
WAV - 379.1MB
AIFF - 379.6MB
All I know is that 320 kbps is my preferred format. FLAC is also very high quality as is supposed to be close to CD quality? Sorry, I'm not too experienced with this. HiResDes could answer this question.
Depends.
If you're a serious audophile, do with .WAV or .FLAC. If you just want to listen to the album, MP3 320 works just as fine. AAC is Apple's codec, iirc. Basically, smaller the file size, """worse""" the quality.
What is it exactly about J. Cole that has people even remotely interested in a Cole Kendrick collab album. I mean let's keep it 100,000 Cole got fucking washed on that Black Friday double song thing. There's no way Cole will match Kendrick's energy on an album from what I've heard.
The two current best collaborating is a good idea.
lolThe two current best collaborating is a good idea.
lol
EDIT: This Ab-Soul album is so long wtf
I know I'm mostly alone here in gaf-hop on this subject but I like the J. Cole album.
The Gambino album was an enjoyable listen; I can't defend that California track, though. Holy shit
Naw. Kendrick dropped another influential classic that resulted in many rappers (and other genres) leaning towards political/higher concept albums.whew, who would have imagined that by 2016, all three of Kendrick, Cole and Drake would have failed us with their latest big releases
#ZeroHeroes
#NoIdols
haven't listened to the new Cole yet but not expecting much based on how exceptionally awful the single was
i like it too
File size question is pretty complicated but here's how I see it if you plan on archiving, ie converting to smaller file sizes and or CD later always go with the lossless file formats like FLAC or ALAC. However where I differ from true audiophiles is on my views about lossy formats. I believe when properly encoded from a lossless format most people couldn't hear the difference from say a V0 format mp3 or 192kbps AAC to FLAC, WAV, ALAC when properly adjusted to the same volume. AAC is particularly the best format for saving space as it is the most efficient at really lossy bitrates like 192kbps and under. I would say the threshold for most listeners being able to discern true losses would be at a rough 192kpbs for mp3 and maybe as low as 128kpbs for AAC. Most people aren't sporting Sennheiser HD800s and the like.
Really cool open ended format that's as efficient as AAC in many facets but not nearly adopted or supported enough to ever use. Wikipedia uses it currently.I wanted to, but there were too many skippers for me. Why the fuck is "Chris Tucker" on there?
WTF is Ogg Vorbis
MP3 V0 - 71.3MB
MP3 320 - 86.6MB
FLAC - 275.9MB
AAC - 42.4MB
Ogg Vorbis - 52.3MB
ALAC - 280.3MB
WAV - 379.1MB
AIFF - 379.6MB
Wild how Ab-Soul just came out of nowhere and dropped the best rap album of the year.
Here's a quick and dirty reference guide.
Formats can be divided into three groups: uncompressed, lossless compressed, and lossy compressed. Uncompressed means that the audio data is stored without any compression to reduce file size. Lossless compressed means that the audio data has been compressed to reduce file size but no data is destroyed in the process so they will sound identical to uncompressed formats. Lossy compressed files are compressed and audio data is destroyed in the compression process but in return lossy compressed formats are able to achieve the lowest file sizes of the three.
This is highly debated but in general high quality lossy formats will sound basically the same as lossless formats to most people. Lossless is a good choice if you want a format that is archival quality or if you just have a lot of storage space to spare. One limitation of lossy formats is that you should not convert lossy formats to other formats as that will further reduce audio quality (ex. FLAC -> WAV is good, FLAC -> MP3 is good, MP3 -> AAC is bad, MP3 -> MP3 is bad). Most people will generally be better off with lossy formats like MP3 for most casual use.
As far as uncompressed formats go I would not recommend using them unless you have a specific reason to such as in audio production, with certain hardware, for legacy support, etc.
Lossy Compressed Audio Formats:
MP3 V0 - This is the highest quality variable bit rate (VBR) MP3 format. Variable bit rate means that the bit rate of the audio encoding will change depending on whether the encoder determines it needs a high bit rate to achieve high quality audio playback or not. For example 10 seconds of silence will require significantly less data than 10 seconds of complex instrumentals. A VBR encoder will use less data to store that silence compared to the instrumental. V0 can encode up to 320 kbps.
As for MP3s in general they are known for being supported with pretty much every digital music player out there. The downside to MP3s is that the format is kind of dated and newer formats achieve comparable quality at lower file sizes.
MP3 320 - This is the highest quality constant bit rate (CBR) MP3 format. The difference between 320 and V0 is that 320 encodes at a constant 320 kbps regardless of what the audio is. It is generally considered to have comparable quality to V0 but at a larger file size. Due to this V0 tends to be more popular with many users. 320 is known as being the highest quality MP3 format in terms of bit rate but whether or not there are any real world benefits for the trade off in file size is debatable.
AAC - AAC was developed as the successor format to MP3 but it never really took off to a huge degree in consumer music players as MP3 had become ubiquitous by the time it was released. AAC achieves comparable quality to MP3 at lower file sizes. These days AAC is known primarily due to Apple as it's their format of choice for the iTunes music store. In general I would only really bother with AAC if you are a heavy user of the Apple ecosystem (iTunes/iPhone/etc.)
Ogg Vorbis - An open audio format that also achieves comparable quality to MP3 at lower file sizes. Ogg Vorbis is mostly notable for being an open format that doesn't require any licensing fees to use and is/was popular in the open-source community. These days Ogg has largely been overtaken by Opus which has even lower file sizes. I generally wouldn't recommend using Ogg Vorbis unless you have a specific reason to.
Lossless Compressed Audio Formats:
FLAC - FLAC is generally the most popular of the lossless compressed audio formats and is getting more support these days although not nearly as much as something like MP3. Like other lossless formats FLAC achieves "CD quality" audio but in return has noticeably larger file sizes than lossy formats. FLAC is a good choice if you want something that is archival quality, you desire high quality audio over low file sizes, or you just have lots of disk space to spare. FLAC is what I personally use when available. I would not typically recommend FLAC if limited storage space is a problem (ex. on many phones).
ALAC - ALAC is Apple's lossless audio format. It is largely comparable to FLAC but is mostly supported with Apple products. Like AAC I generally wouldn't bother with it unless you are a heavy Apple user and want a lossless format that is natively supported by iTunes/iPhone/etc.
Uncompressed Audio Formats:
WAV - WAV is the standard raw uncompressed audio format on Windows. There is basically no reason to store your music in WAV as lossless formats will have identical audio quality at lower file sizes. I would use this only if you have a specific reason to.
AIFF - AIFF is Apple's raw uncompressed audio format. Much like WAV I would not recommend storing your music in this format unless you have a specific reason to.
You say AAC and Ogg Vorbis achieve comparable quality to MP3 at lower file sizes, but that's not really accurate, they're wholly superior to MP3 at comparable bitrates, which is more accurate to say.
Funny you use a Nintendo gif because the beat on Deja Vu sounds like the Wii Shop Music...can't believe I'm saying this but this Post Malone album is fire
That track with Biebz
..can't believe I'm saying this but this Post Malone album is fire
That track with Biebz