which one is better. the behinds the scene or cleaned up version?
![]()
![]()
That's him though... I got him to smile in some shots but he said he hates smiling in photos. This isn't like a portrait for him to use to send around to galleries or something (he's an artist). I think of it as my own artistic portrait. The camera angle and his expression are the whole point behind the photo in my view. He never really smiles IRL and has that blank expression to him. I feel the low angle, his expression and the dripping paint work to give a sense of anxiety in the shot which is what I went for.
this is so good. the wide angle and the balance of it all, and the eye peeking. Looks so clean like a part of some editorial. Awesome work.
Just going to add a little thing i was working on last night when i couldn't sleep. grumpy glitchyyy
Untitled by Bodie Strain, on Flickr
Honestly the shallow depth makes it difficult to even guess what is behind him so the dripping paint is lost there IMO, almost looks like strings or something. To me the picture doesn't give off a very dread filled feeling. The dude just looks tired and grumpy. Better focus and less shallow depth of field would give me a better impression of who he is, hard to tell he is an artist or that that is art behind him.
SW China:
Complimentary by Eric, on Flickr
~snip~
Dude a 60th isn't even fast enough for broad daylight.Wow, this whole set is phenomenal.
Every trip I go on, this is what I'm trying to come back with - something that captures the atmosphere, the culture, the feel of the trip. Unfortunately for me, one shot is grainy, another pointless, and the rest blurry ;p But man, great work here!
Friendly reminder to myself, I NEED to force faster shutter on myself. I can restore a dark photo in Lightroom, but I can't get rid of blur.I almost always stick to 1/60 for street photography at night; but when I'm quickly moving my camera and body while a subject runs by, the shot is a mess. I should probably speed things up.
Were you shooting at something that had the potential of moving or messing up the potential sharpness by say breathing? Even at 1/100th people tend to be too erratic to nail the focus on for me.Recently took a photo in a dark tunnel at 1/8s, zooming in in post was pretty sharp. Get on my level. Granted it was a 28mm lens on FF.
Vern, great photos in here and also a shout out to supernormal for your small business project further up the page.
For what it's worth, here's another version of my portrait where the eyes were in focus.
basically at this point I think I'm just overanalyzing the photo. I just wanted to make, like pretty much always, a visually interesting portrait. The photo isn't very flattering for the subject, but then again I don' t think a portrait necessarily needs to be (unless someone hires you and that's what they want).
Wow, this whole set is phenomenal.
Every trip I go on, this is what I'm trying to come back with - something that captures the atmosphere, the culture, the feel of the trip. Unfortunately for me, one shot is grainy, another pointless, and the rest blurry ;p But man, great work here!
Friendly reminder to myself, I NEED to force faster shutter on myself. I can restore a dark photo in Lightroom, but I can't get rid of blur.I almost always stick to 1/60 for street photography at night; but when I'm quickly moving my camera and body while a subject runs by, the shot is a mess. I should probably speed things up.
And then a behind-the-scenes look from the European team photo:
A couple photos from the morning session of the Ryder Cup:
which one is better. the behinds the scene or cleaned up version?
![]()
![]()
The general rule is you can't fire the shutter until impact. But if you have a silent shutter or you're far enough away they can't hear it then you're good.What is the protocol with taking photos of the golfers teeing off? Do some of them get pissed off if you are taking photos mid-swing or do you wait until they are in their follow through to take the shots?
A couple photos from the morning session of the Ryder Cup:
2016 Ryder Cup - Spieth on 6 by brerwolfe, on Flickr
That is one dystopic McDonalds
I like the black and white and that woman cooking. I think I faved or liked the corn shucking thing somewhere.
Or Facebook or Flickr. It's hard to keep track these days.Probably Instagram![]()
The McDonald's, Corn Shucking and dude getting in the truck are awesome.
The Ryder Cup is in Minnesota this year and the weather is perfect. I'm used to hot or steamy weather when covering golf, but the highs this week won't be over 70° and it's awesome.
I'm pretty sure this isn't your first and/or last time.I feel so embarrassed to be an American right now...
Another nice set man, I like the last one. Are you given freedom to shoot what you want or you directed to shoot the stands and people and that sort of thing? I like that it's not just golf, but the whole event, and the culture around it captured. Cuz tbh a picture of a golfer is pretty boring in and of itself.
I'm pretty sure this isn't your first and/or last time.
I'm just shooting for me, honestly.I feel so embarrassed to be an American right now...
Another nice set man, I like the last one. Are you given freedom to shoot what you want or you directed to shoot the stands and people and that sort of thing? I like that it's not just golf, but the whole event, and the culture around it captured. Cuz tbh a picture of a golfer is pretty boring in and of itself.
I'm just shooting for me, honestly.
My job this week is to get video of the press conferences and they don't have any until play is finished, so I have absolutely nothing to do for 11 of the 13-14 hours I'm working (I have to be in early each day to shoot a video hit with our radio guys before play begins). And because this tournament isn't run by the PGA Tour I have very little access to anything. Usually I'm inside the ropes but they're not letting me this week, so I'm just trying to make something halfway interesting.
It doesn't matter what I do as long as I'm ready when a player comes into the interview room. Saturday morning I spent a couple hours studying for my FAA drone license, got bored and decided to go take some photos.
Every time I see verns photos I miss China![]()
I'm still learning ropes on post-processing and I'm going for a cyberpunk/ghost in the shell look.
While the differences between these are minimal I've been going back and forward trying to decide which is the "final form"
Which one of these would you go with?
"The Net is vast and infinite" by Marco Sousa, no Flickr
DSC00244l by Marco Sousa, no Flickr
Hey PhotoGAF. Beautiful pictures.
Are noob questions allowed here too?
If so, here goes:
I've owned a Nikon D70s since my early days in college, with my handy 50mm f/1.8 and 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G kit lens. Its been a great camera for multipurpose hobby shooting, but it has become a bit dated and honestly I want something in a more compact package.
I have been looking into a mirrorless camera due to the smaller bodies, and currently my top contenders are the Sony A6300, Olympus E-M1, and the Fujifilm X-T1. I don't currently own any lenses that would work with these, so existing glass isn't a consideration. My budget is up to $2k, but from reviews it's not clear if the price differential to the $1.5-2k cameras justifies the extra investment (XT-2, Sony Alpha 7 II). Thoughts?
I plan on using zoom lenses, mostly around 12-60mm, to shoot broad landscapes, cityscapes, the occasional portrait, and my car sitting in pretty places.
Any recommendations/suggestions out of the above, or any cameras I haven't mentioned?
Thanks! I knew such a thing existed, but wasn't able to find itNothing against them I think, but we have a thread dedicated to camera HW and questions about it.
http://neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1165019
That's a hard choice. The first one has a good mood going but I dig the punchiness and clarity of the second which works well with the fine detail. I'd say the second one.
I like this one the most. How do people do these?fun with a tripod!
![]()