WhereAreMahDragonz
Banned
That's interesting, is there a reason you put FEP up as scum Dragonz?
See my response to Swamped
Realized this after. What if they're just coasting town?
Anything is possible.
That's interesting, is there a reason you put FEP up as scum Dragonz?
Realized this after. What if they're just coasting town?
Tbf I read it the same way as swamped and only double checked after you answered her.I like how Swamped quotes an obvious response to Gorlak and pretends I was talking to her and gets huffy about it.
A+ turn around.
Why not Vere?I don't even know how to respond to FEP. Sorry, I haven't spurred conversation? I've said my piece. I want Swamped or Blarg dead. To be completely honest, I'd prefer Blarg at this point, he's coasting on purpose. At least Swamped is posting mega posts every other day which means if she is scum, she is leaving a trail. My vote is on Swamped though because I can't count on any of you to go after an inactive apparently and I'm tired of shit lynches so I'm going for one I want that has the most chance of success. I'm around a bit more throughout the night but I work tomorrow night so I'll go to sleep at some point and try to be back an hour or two before deadline.
Why do you scumread Fran?Oops I accidentally put Fran twice
He's a scum read the formatting was weird, sorry
Why not Vere?
I don't even know how to respond to FEP. Sorry, I haven't spurred conversation? I've said my piece. I want Swamped or Blarg dead. To be completely honest, I'd prefer Blarg at this point, he's coasting on purpose. At least Swamped is posting mega posts every other day which means if she is scum, she is leaving a trail. My vote is on Swamped though because I can't count on any of you to go after an inactive apparently and I'm tired of shit lynches so I'm going for one I want that has the most chance of success. I'm around a bit more throughout the night but I work tomorrow night so I'll go to sleep at some point and try to be back an hour or two before deadline.
He did say he was unavailable for most of this day phase, I think.My read on Vere isn't as strong as others. I see the logic in it and it's a fine lynch but I didn't come to that conclusion myself, I came to it based on reading others posts.If we're throwing out other names, it continues to surprise me when I remember Kawl is even in this game. He isn't know for being this quiet at all.
Doing my list now, SPOILER, it's a shit list and you're all on it.
CCS, my old mucker, which way does your heart lean today?
Bronx and the poisoner. This whole thing as a scum gambit seems insane. I would believe the poisoner being either neutral or scum. Bronx being alive might suggest neutral but there's some wifom there. What I do have to say about Bronx is that as of now I believe him unless I can be convinced it is a gambit. Claiming so early on D2 left a real poison doctor tons of time to counter him. Saving the claim for the last hour if he was actually on the chopping block would have given him decent odds of not having a real counter present if it was a fake claim.
Why do you scumread Fran?
No need to say anything, matey. I do think you're okay with the slow state of the game though. Interested to see what blarg does end of day. I'm reading town there right now.
I won't argue too hard against a Vere lynch because there is something to be learned from it but I think Acorns is more likely to flip scum.
Who is this aimed at? I assume me because of your vote?
Fran's on it, was for Sorian. You still working on your big one there?Who is this aimed at? I assume me because of your vote?
well, i do not know if bronx is going to make it ( surviving and or heal me ) so i will have to make a hard decision.
Fran's on it, was for Sorian. You still working on your big one there?
Kyanrute [m] - scum or neutral, reading back, there's a few post (712, 714, 719), where Kyan doesn't want CCS to bring up neutral factions because D1 and then doesn't want to discuss it with Faddy. Looks weird in hindsight, why does it matter when it's D1 and why not discuss alternative factions, surely town has to eliminate ALL threats, not just scum. Then in post 732, says that he expects a lot of night kills, a populate scum team, and a fair share of neutrals? Why the flip flop? Then again 746, says neutral team is a possibility but not likely. Sounds like he knows something and is just trying to muddy the waters.
Also this 'Iirc I still have a vote on gry, did that because of low amount of appearances I think. Gry comments on the recent issues and offers the woe is me of small post count defense what I don't still like. Taking cover even before shots have been fired. but then again he writes in silly way sometimes forgetting that capital letters exist so he must be nice' Makes me feel like I'm looking at scummates. Mentions scum friend but doesn't do anything about it.
Verelios [m] - lean town, voted Kalor D1 and Crab D2. See D1 lynch as meh since D1, see D2 lynch as a it's either him or me. Rereading his posts from D2, a lot of them seem defensive and answering questions. Has some tiffs with CCS and Kyanrute, doesn't throw shade or make them lynch targets despite being one of the main lynch targets himself, so doesn't scream scum trying to shift attention to me.
If I didn't already, I'd scumread acohrs just for repeating this nonsense argument. It's equally valid for Burb, Kawl, Fran, and (town!) Crab.Sorian [m] - lean scum, has voted for both town lynches so far that have turned out to be town. From a meta perspective, Sorian in a few recent mafia game has been targeted N1 because he is usually someone that leads town discussion. The fact that he hasn't been targeted in 2 night phases is very worrying from a meta POV
Gorlak [m] - scum, didn't like Gryvan's play D1 and his vote on me looked like a OMGUS after someone put some serious heat on him. Gorlak hasn't done anything to change my mind, if anything he's playing it much safer and blending in. Nothing special to see, which after my initial thoughts of Gryvan, doesn't make me trust them anymore. Also, kyan's post suggests a connection.
Actually I don't agree with any of Acohrs' reads except maybe Blarg. His reasoning for Vere is especially weak.
More of the same busted logic, waving away something in veres post only to jump on it for someone else.Meh, I did an initial reads list and shared my thoughts. Agree or disagree that's fine, hoped that it would help facilitate discussion since we've only 5 pages of new posts since D3 start.
If you want to lynch me over it then fine, get to leave this boring game with all you boring nonshitposters.
Also @Kyan, your back and forth from D2 with Vere was worrying. I can understand Vere's need to be defensive, but I don't understand your reason.
More of the same busted logic, waving away something in veres post only to jump on it for someone else.
Meh, I did an initial reads list and shared my thoughts. Agree or disagree that's fine, hoped that it would help facilitate discussion since we've only 5 pages of new posts since D3 start.
If you want to lynch me over it then fine, get to leave this boring game with all you boring nonshitposters.
Also @Kyan, your back and forth from D2 with Vere was worrying. I can understand Vere's need to be defensive, but I don't understand your reason.
Holy shit this is such a bad response and you get why right. As town you should at least be clear on your logic and try to make sure it's consistent and whenever it isn't consistent or you aren't following logic, you can say "it's a gut read what can you do??"Good luck with my town flip then
My reason to do what? I imagine you are talking about my reaction to Vere's Crab vote post. If you wonder about specifics, ask.
Overall, when I saw the post I was certain that Vere was not interested in an actual discussion. Personal experience, people who defend themselves like that rarely do, be it in mafia or real life. What told me this? The fact that instead of defending himself and discussing the accusations I made he chose to call it all garbage and chose the aggressive antagonizing way, contributing nothing. Thus, the reaction. But because one never can be sure about people, I gave him the one chance to find some posts for me so we could have an actual meaningful discussion. A chance not worth giving, as I found out.
You mention you felt that Vere's reaction was understandable. What part of it?
Vere's response seems in keeping with someone that was nearly lynched yesterday, desperate and reactionary. That's what I see when I reread that section
You should Role-claim, Swamped
interesting, interesting
Your turn, Crabclaim
TY, noted
You shouldn't have Role-claimed, Swamped.
You'd returned to a fairly defensible position in the Vote Count and could've likely coped with the vote-heat Today in your risky bunker, but in a brilliant textbook display of attrition Crabbage Role-flushed you out over 2 Days like a professional.
I'll tell you what I think of Crabmeat; his D1 guerrilla whining, and now his D2 boomeranging and tentative vote-shotgunning?
Specifically, Swamped, he picked you to besiege because he needed to engage a player that he knew would not get lynched too quickly with the help of their own anti-Town merits, after a bit of concentrated pressure-ribbing (a player like me, Bronx or nin), yet he needed a player that would not show him up with more reliable pro-Townness than himself upon being engaged in extended conversation (a player like Sorian, Natiko or Kawl).
Hence, you, Swamped; as an all-around, unassuming player in terms of thread presence, read capability and reputation, you were the perfect target for Crab's design. Crab's only other vote on D1 was against Bronx; this vote (and why not me, I wonder? Because I'm too high-profile a shitposter, that's why. He would actually lose Townie points if he went after the too-obvious 'obstacle to coherence') was clearly only meant as a stepping stone from which to leap onto his real target for the greater game of his. You were a blank slate that Crab could write a scumtell saga on, and he knew people would buy his tales of you for quite an extended period of (Crab) time; his stance on you shows itself in his repeated statements of how he can't seem to manage to pin your motives down despite his constant boomeranging back to you out of the whole player roster, after all of which you'd think he'd have a fairer gauge of you by then. Crab knows that Role-claims are an inevitability; yet, whether you, Swamped, broke or not was inconsequential to him, in the end.
He has used you to maintain visibility, used you to establish his own thread presence as an attack-form and relied on the others' perception of attack as scum-hunt, to keep himself seated on that scum-hunter's throne. Tunnelling is a magnificent strategy to employ towards being seen as pro-Town if carried out with the restraint as Crab has shown; it bears minimal risk to the user, as commitment to a single target rather than the standard multiple vague leads offers the user the chance to put themselves in that most desirable of pro-Town states: self-redemption. If said target of tunnelling flips as scum then the user is vindicated, elevated in pro-Town stature and the charade continues, and if said target flips as Town, the user can deliberately beg forgiveness for their own "shortsightedness" and come off as pro-Town when they "broaden their once-narrow scope" by only afterwards including the other players in their reads (which they should've been doing to begin with if they were really for Town's interest, instead of their own).
Hence, I think his siege on you, Swamped, belies a very careful, orchestrated tunnelling meant to anchor his presence to the pro-Town seefloor, but for the purposes of staying alive as long as possible. You have:
D1) Crab enters the arena on the basis of whining about how terrible we are as a player collective. He knows that whining, while anti-Town in itself, is not enough of a basis to get himself lynched, and whining has the benefit of also setting him up to be seen as pro-Town when he makes his scum-hunting "comeback". Thereby, he has neatly set himself up for an assumption of a throne of leadership later in the game.
D2) Crab doesn't get what he wanted in the Swamped lynch, but that's okay for Crab, because not getting what he wanted is exactly what he wanted; as his nominee has progressed to the next Day, so has his setup for keeping up appearances. Today, he goes back and forth on a new unsurety regarding Swamped, jumping between Faddy, Verelios and Bronx, in the hopes of setting-up a new target to continue his charade once/if/when Swamped is removed from play.
Now, what does this all say about his Alignment?
Honestly, I can't say. All signs point to a guarded importance of self. He could be a Neutral. He could be a scum. He could be a Town PR.
I dunno. But 2/3 good odds, eh?
Swamped pls
pls explain "chocolate pudding"
Commuter pls
Why did you specifically say chocolate pudding when Natiko only mentioned pudding in his Last Will? Why, Swamped?
There is custom Role fuckery on the level of St?p?fy afoot in this game, and now it's pissing me off, specifically what happened to me last Night
Tell me, Swamped, what did you do last Night?
Also does anyone else like fruit?
I like how Swamped quotes an obvious response to Gorlak and pretends I was talking to her and gets huffy about it.
A+ turn around.
I've played a lot with acohrs, and I honestly feel he's town. I get the reasons for wanting to lynch him, and if his play was coming from anyone else I'd say they were scum, but I think he's town.
What? Vere was not under any threat on day one. Alternatively, if you mean to say that Vere's reaction made sense given the lynch threat on him at the time of the reaction, I disagree. There was no guarantee that Vere would be Crab's dance partner when Vere voted.. Vere's vote made the race a 7-3-2-2 / Crab-Vere-Swamped-CCS and I'd argue that it wasn't until LP's vote at t-minus 30 when the Vere train really started.
Holy shit this is such a bad response and you get why right. As town you should at least be clear on your logic and try to make sure it's consistent and whenever it isn't consistent or you aren't following logic, you can say "it's a gut read what can you do??"
In a scenario in which you flip town, yours becomes one of the few opinions anyone can trust beyond their own to be a good faith attempt. But if before that you throw out bad logic don't even put a gutTM disclaimer on it, and tell people to take a hike IM TOWN it makes basically everything you've posted worthless.
So which is it? Town actively trying to minimize the help they are providing or scum?
Convince me, I'm open to it. I would really like to lynch scum today instead of hitting frustrated town again.
What's the hard decision?
To claim or not to claim. Since i do not know what would be the better decision.
Wold it put you at risk for his benefit? Or are you at risk already and need to claim for your own benefit? If the latter, then yes. If the former, then no.
Can you explain more the two inconsistencies I've mentioned already. Basically in terms of one of only two people to have voted on two townies who got lynched for splinter and sorian, why does that not apply to vere with votes on crab and kalor?OK, I'm willing to engage with anyone that doesn't throw my reads under a bridge after spending an hour or two rereading and making them.
What do you want to discuss?
To claim or not to claim. Since i do not know what would be the better decision.
Can you explain more the two inconsistencies I've mentioned already. Basically in terms of one of only two people to have voted on two townies who got lynched for splinter and sorian, why does that not apply to vere with votes on crab and kalor?
And kyan (I think) posted above that vere wasn't super close to the leading wagon when their whole shit exchange occurred. With that in mind, why did you feel that veres response was reasonable but kyans wasn't?