The first 3 books, yeah. It goes downhill after that.
Sure in the sense that the first 3 are top tier fantasy books, AFFC is good and ADWD is very good. Also, AFFC is hurt by covering the most boring characters in the series.
The first 3 books, yeah. It goes downhill after that.
But she DOES offer Ned sex and we have a scene of her and Lancel pretty early too. Its clear that they didn't know what they would be doing five seasons later.
other way around, peasants used to marry in their twenties, nobles married young, but the marriage usually wasn't consummated for a whileWhich was actually a common age for girls (at least peasants) to marry in the middle ages.
It does make me uncomfortable to read though.
Sure in the sense that the first 3 are top tier fantasy books, AFFC is good and ADWD is very good.
It's massively overrated.
I have a feeling people watch it because it's like a watercooler social type thing where everyone else is watching it so you have to too.
Sure in the sense that the first 3 are top tier fantasy books, AFFC is good and ADWD is very good. Also, AFFC is hurt by covering the most boring characters in the book.
Did you miss the part about how problematic the show is? No one seems to have rebutted the sexism, racism or homophobia yet.
ADWD is a slog that's only saved by Theon's chapters. The only reason I give the show any credit compared to the books is that the books had already dropped so precipitously in quality. Somehow S6 of the show presented a more coherent trajectory toward ending this massive pile of plot overreach.
other way around, peasants used to marry in their twenties, nobles married young, but the marriage usually wasn't consummated for a while
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_European_marriage_pattern
Things are happening constantly, albeit at a pretty slow pace most of the time. Then there are the big events that are usually saved for episode 9. I don't know how you can say nothing happens when the show has gone through likeI know this isn't the best way to judge, but I watched that British 5-season recap (if you know what I'm referring to), hoping that it would make me want to watch it.
It all seemed so lifeless, and so... slow? Even with all the events crammed together... nothing really seemed to happen?
A few people went here... some moved there gradually, with some dragons... some stern conversations were had... and... I dunno... apart from the sheer scope, epic nature, and chilling production design, what am I truly missing?
What is there to rebut? Can a show not depict sexism, racism, or homophobia?
Are people allowed to like a show that depicts these things?
The show does feel homophobic. Loras does pretty much nothing but get arrested and tried for being gay. He's just a plot device.
In the book, Margaery's trial has nothing to do with her brother being gay. And instead of being a passive plot device awaiting trial, book Loras leads the charge on Dragonstone and gets incapacitated because he was desperate to free up the fleet sieging the island so that they could used against ironborn ships raiding Tyrell territory. From honor and bravery in the book, to having no qualities and doing nothing in the show for the past few seasons aside from 'is gay' (and then using that to make up an excuse for a trial)
It isn't the fact that it depicts it that is problematic, it's how it depicts it and the hypocrisy of those depictions.
On one hand the script can be pretty terrible at times, and sure the characterizations are all over the place, it can be heavy handed and really silly.
You have to assume that a lot of these characters timelines are not taking place at the same time. I guess that's the only way of suspending belief in how the show portrays things. However, some traveling no matter how hard you look at it is, ridiculous. Little Finger and Varys are the worst offenders.
On one hand the script can be pretty terrible at times, and sure the characterizations are all over the place, it can be heavy handed and really silly.
On the other hand...
Don't forget this epic moment:On one hand the script can be pretty terrible at times, and sure the characterizations are all over the place, it can be heavy handed and really silly.
On the other hand...
I love the show but is it even still that popular? I know alot of people come back when the season starts but I havent heard one peep about the show in ages, even from people I used to talk about it with on the regular.
He's not only gay but is depicted as a talentless idiot who brings down his whole family. And the sequence of events are incredibly dumb.The show does feel homophobic. Loras does pretty much nothing but get arrested and tried for being gay. He's just a plot device.
In the book, Margaery's trial has nothing to do with her brother being gay. And instead of being a passive plot device awaiting trial, book Loras leads the charge on Dragonstone and gets incapacitated because he was desperate to free up the fleet sieging the island so that they could used against ironborn ships raiding Tyrell territory. From honor and bravery in the book, to having no qualities and doing nothing in the show for the past few seasons aside from 'is gay' (and then using that to make up an excuse for a trial)
Does that make the show homophobic or simply Loras a not interesting written character? I mean, the show only makes you feel empathy for Loras, not hate him.The show does feel homophobic. Loras does pretty much nothing but get arrested and tried for being gay. He's just a plot device.
In the book, Margaery's trial has nothing to do with her brother being gay. And instead of being a passive plot device awaiting trial, book Loras leads the charge on Dragonstone and gets incapacitated because he was desperate to free up the fleet sieging the island so that they could used against ironborn ships raiding Tyrell territory. From honor and bravery in the book, to having no qualities and doing nothing in the show for the past few seasons aside from 'is gay' (and then using that to make up an excuse for a trial)
Please do tell, what is the "proper" way to depict something as awful as homophobia?
Don't forget this epic moment:
It says right there in the OP they love the books but hate the show's interpretation.You could have saved us a lot of time, OP, if you had just written "PEOPLE ARE MEAN IN THESE BOOKS IN WAYS I DISLIKE".
Even the teleporting bits, where you could have had a good point, falls flat since your examples are actually poor.
And despite all this you've obviously watched several seasons of this.
Reminds me of the folks who put 400 hours into Fallout and then declare that It Sucks.
Lol. Fucking Sand Snakes are the worst thing about this show.
Your move OP
And one of them is making it into Iron Fist on Netflix! Can't keep them down!
What a well rounded and interesting response to an OP that at least tried to justify opinionsShut up OP. Go read the books and come back to usand whine more, we don't care.
They turned a guy who was defined by his unrivaled skill with a sword and his devotion to Renly and Margaery...into a stereotype. If he's not being humiliated by Cersei, he's telling whores family secrets and jeopardizing everything.Does that make the show homophobic or simply Loras a not well written character? I mean, the show only makes you feel empathy for Lora, not hate him.
Reminds me of the folks who put 400 hours into Fallout and then declare that It Sucks.
Oh, that might explain the so far lacking choreography.And one of them is making it into Iron Fist on Netflix! Can't keep them down!
And despite all this you've obviously watched several seasons of this.
Reminds me of the folks who put 400 hours into Fallout and then declare that It Sucks.
Yeah whip girl was in Star Wars too.
We'll see if she is a good Colleen Wing. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt though, because I think the problem with the Sand Snakes is more the writing than the acting.