I always find that thing fucking cool when it's comes to opening a season premiere though. It sets off a good mood and a interesting sense of mystery. I'm pretty sure LOST did it on a number of occasions.Hmm not sure starting the new season with total unknown characters would be the right step. Worked in the book, don't think it would in the show. Always felt it was one of the weaker prologues in any case.
I wonder why they didnt make the epilogue with Cressen the start of the show. Would've have made the introduction of Melisandre, Davos and Stannis so much stronger than what it became.
Blah Blah Blah. Good, don't watch. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Just as long as we don't need to read your whiny bitching the entire season. Seriously, everything in your post is nerd rage over the smallest, most nit picky crap. Jaime's reaction wasn't exactly to your liking? Really? The dragon doesn't face the direction you want him to face? The comet doesn't look right? The fact that you need to find inane stuff like this to bitch about proves they're doing something right. Just ditch the show and stick with the books. The fact that you come to such grandiose conclusions over the 1st ep, which primarily is introducing characters, is incredible. Grow up and trying to understand that this show wasn't made exclusively for lovers of the book, but to a wide audience, and the decisions are catered towards them. Personally, the books bore the fuck out of me with their endless exposition and slow pace, so I'm all for the writers taking every liberty they can to make a good show.
To be fair, it's not like the book readers even really had a idea of what those characters were when they initially read the prologue.They probably wanted to start off the show with characters the non book reading audience knows rather than a group a strangers.
To be fair, it's not like the book readers even really had a idea of what those characters were when they initially read the prologue.
Yeah, I pictured Stannis with more hair as well and a beard/goatee.Carice van Houten was a great call, exactly how I pictured her character while reading book two. Stannis and Davos aren't bad either, but I thought Stannis had a fuller head of hair and a bit of facial hair.
Just caught your rant thanks to Amir0x replying to someone who replied to your rant and I absolutely agree with the bolded. It was what I expected going in, I couldn't believe they decided to skip out on that prologue. I felt it really set the tone of the book and in general I agree with the rest of your post. I don't want them butchering canon as an excuse to make the show their own.I don't say this intending to attack anyone but I think you guys are kind of delusional with comments like "The best show on TV since The Wire" and "This show can do no wrong anymore."
Budgetary and time constraints have butchered the quality of GRRM's writing since the beginning. I was hoping they'd rectify some of the issues going into season 2, but it really seems like more of the same crap. The writers are just checking off items in a list of shit that needs to happen, and to get there they often invent things for the characters to do that betray who they're supposed to be in the first place. There are changes I can accept, like Jaime being a pussified version of himself or Cersei allowing Tyrion to peck her on the cheek. But then there's stuff like the meeting between Cersei and Littefinger, which just doesn't even make sense from a rational point of view. Why would Littlefinger ever threaten her? Why is she going around the courtyard yelling in front of guards and servants that they've lost Arya Stark? There's too many instances of stuff not making the slightest sense. And there's some big issues for me, like for example Tyrionjust straight up bringing Shae into the castle, which makes me assume the whole daddy issue thing is going to be glossed over, along with his obsession with Shae).
There are also some things I can't understand, such as why so much focus is given to a character like the whore that went to King's Landing (why is she even still here??). Or why, riding off the high of the end of last season, this episode starts out with Joffrey's birthday party. The proper way to start this is like the book: with the comet, the prophecy, and Stannis, who is one of the driving forces behind the "clash of kings." You need to set up a theme, some type of conflict, give the viewer an idea of what's to be expected this season. Then you give everyone Tyrion and Jon Snow or whatever. Starting off with Ser Dontos is just poor writing. It makes the show feel even more aimless than it already was.
Just caught your rant thanks to Amir0x replying to someone who replied to your rant and I absolutely agree with the bolded. It was what I expected going in, I couldn't believe they decided to skip out on that prologue. I felt it really set the tone of the book and in general I agree with the rest of your post. I don't want them butchering canon as an excuse to make the show their own.
christ, can none of you people accept criticism without withering into a pile of whining bullshit? It's criticism, not an insult to your mother. Stop taking this shit personally. YOU are not the show, and elaborating into detail on why you think the show sucks is not an affront on your honor.
I like the show but holy fuck
I pictures Stannis as a balding man.
He does have a receding hairline on the show. But not enough if you ask me. lol
I pictured him as bald, goatee, huge jaw, rather tall and muscular. With an ice cold stare. he looks and acts like a wimp in the show. Am disappoint.
I know, and Arya's actor has so far really dropped the ball.
I know, and Arya's actor has so far really dropped the ball.
... what the fuck people, he had two scenes. If you've built him a look in your mind when you read the books ages ago, of course the show can't match it in the first episode, if ever.
Stannis has always been wiry to me, muscular, but not big like Robert, the only complaint I have of the actor is his jaw isn't clenched 100% of the time.
I'm hoping the season doesn't fuck up the more important scenes and the pacing doesn't continue to feel weird.
how DARE you criticize the show!
I don't want them butchering canon as an excuse to make the show their own.
Meh, I love pretty much all characters and even thought that Lena Headey nailed it this time. There were tons of mischievous glances and a couple of powerful fuck off moments. Heck, even the wig looked better.
Cersei haters can come at me.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/apr/03/game-of-thrones-mad-men?CMP=twt_fdIt seems that UK audiences have more of a penchant for swords, sandals and sorcery than slick Madison avenue suits, as the series two premiere of the Sky Atlantic import attracted 522,000 viewers on Monday 2 April.
The fantasy drama, which attracted 743,000 viewers when the show launched on 18 April last year backed by a massive ad campaign, peaked with 633,000.
The average live audience for the first series of Game of Thrones was about 365,000 viewers.
This compares with the return of Mad Men in a double episode opener for the fifth season, which pulled in just 98,000 viewers to Sky Atlantic last Tuesday.
Game Of Thrones even outperformed Mad Men when the show was available free-to-air on BBC4 – the fourth series of the advertising drama attracted 355,000 viewers.
Ok was it just me or was the first episode damn confusing?...I understood half of what was going on...I need to find a quick recap of season 1 on Youtube or something and rewatch this episode lol...
Meh, I love pretty much all characters and even thought that Lena Headey nailed it this time. There were tons of mischievous glances and a couple of powerful fuck off moments. Heck, even the wig looked better.
Cersei haters can come at me.
The wait for the ratings news is torturous! If it did big numbers (4-5 million), surely they'll officially greenlight seasons 3 and 4 shortly thereafter..
Ok was it just me or was the first episode damn confusing?...I understood half of what was going on...I need to find a quick recap of season 1 on Youtube or something and rewatch this episode lol...
Carice van Houten was a great call, exactly how I pictured her character while reading book two. Stannis and Davos aren't bad either, but I thought Stannis had a fuller head of hair and a bit of facial hair.
Stannis is exactly what I expected. An icy stoic man but whose mannerisms come off as kind of weedy, unlikeable and hardly the sort of heroic figure he envisions himself as. I think the actor nails this, he seems like the kind of man people would have trouble following. Though that said, the same could be said of Renly based on last season
I expected Davos to be a bit more sombre, almost sad.
I reckon people shout a lot of insults at Jack Gleeson when they meet him. He plays Joffrey perfectly.
Why is the rating news taking so long to come out?
He is talking about episode 2
No need to Spoiler tag the episode stuff because it's already aired.
But...
ACOK Spoiler:
There is mention of it in the books but not in a big way. Certainly not describing Janos killing babies or pushing kids into pools... the dick.
If I remember correctly.
It takes a little longer because HBO releases the info themselves I believe and they get info on the follow up showings, HBO GO viewings, etc.Why is the rating news taking so long to come out?
Going to show my age here. Just seeing the name Van Houten always makes me think of the Tate-LaBianca murders.