• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Gamer-approved laptop recommendation thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
risk said:
My BF and I are looking at laptops on Amazon and noticed that the free 360 deal was still going on. These are the two laptops that it came down to.

Lenovo Y570

Aspire TimelineX 3830TG

I guess the main differences would be the screen size and the GPU. I was wondering if the Timeline X would be okay for me? I play a lot of pick up and go type of games like Luminix and Plants vs Zombies, but I also play Fallout 3 and LOTRO from time to time, plus my BF just bought me Borderlands on Steam. I'm coming from a XPS 1530 and it was pretty big and hefty so I guess I'm also taking that into consideration. I'm leaning towards the Timeline X (more so for the weight), but I also want the best bang for buck so I'm hesitating a bit.

edit: I could also go for the x120/121 netbook, if I were to get the Y570.
The TimelineX would be an amazing machine if not for a widespread throttling problem due to overheating that all but kills games performance:

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Acer-Aspire-3830TG-Subnotebook.54641.0.html

It's so close to being the only Alienware m11x competitor out there, but this flaw basically cripples that potential.
 
risk said:
So there's currently no fix for the throttling problem? Would that mean that the Y570 is a better choice?
I don't think there ever will be a fix, since it seems like they just built it poorly in a way that causes the machine to overheat whenever it's getting heavily used.

I don't know about that Lenovo either. It's a lot bigger and heavier, it has a shitty 5400rpm drive, the resolution is horribly low for a 15.6" screen (720p? Really??), and the battery life probably sucks too.
 
Bah, the only "solution" I've found for the throttling fix is using a program called Throttlestop, but even then I wouldn't be getting the most out of the laptop. Not many other choices.
 
equil said:
I'm looking at getting this.
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=637440&SRCCODE

ASUS G74SX-XT1 Laptop Computer - Intel Core i7-2630QM 2.0GHz, 12GB DDR3, 500GB HDD, Blu-ray Player/DVDRW,3GB GDDR5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M,17.3" Full HD, Windows 7 Home Premium 64,1-Yr Warr./1-Yr Acc.

Is it good for the price? Or is there better, for around the same price?

i'm very tempted to get this too.

I was looking at this one:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834152266

but it seems that the ASUS is better.

I'll wait for Laptop-Gaf judgement.
 
I have a couple of questions on the Alienware m17x

- does the 6990m have a graphic switch option like optimus for nvidia?

-there is the possibility to add a generally named 256gb Dell SSD. Is it worth the premium?

-is the Intel® Core™ i7 Processor 2630QM (2.00Ghz, 6MB, 4C) enough or i need to upgrade?

-i think the 1600x900 resolution screen could be better gaming performance wise, but i saw that many in this thread have choosen the full hd option, what do you think?
I could always plug the laptop to an external full hd monitor, right?
 
Principe Nero said:
I have a couple of questions on the Alienware m17x

- does the 6990m have a graphic switch option like optimus for nvidia?

-there is the possibility to add a generally named 256gb Dell SSD. Is it worth the premium?

-is the Intel® Core™ i7 Processor 2630QM (2.00Ghz, 6MB, 4C) enough or i need to upgrade?

-i think the 1600x900 resolution screen could be better gaming performance wise, but i saw that many in this thread have choosen the full hd option, what do you think?
I could always plug the laptop to an external full hd monitor, right?


1) SSD does not improve game performance. It just significantly boosts loading and opening applications and programs. If it's worth the premium is up to you, but I personally love it. I think going back to HDD for C drive, would make me feel that the computer is slow. I love how every program opens instantly. But as I said - It's not a premium that is gaming related. And what a premium it is. Very expenssive. For those money you could several games, or a really good pair of headphones that will actually add greatly to your gaming preference.
For a budget gamer, I would not suggest. Only for someone going mofo all out.


2) That's a good CPU. One of the fastest from Intel I believe.


3) If it was me, I would go with 1600x900 - There is a rule of thumb that it's best to play in your computers native resolution.

It's true that scaling resolutions, have improved, but some people say that you still have image reduction if you play in less than in your monitors maximum resolution. In other words - if 720p is your maximum resolution, you should play all your games in that resolution.

Furthermore, since 1080p will tax all your games significantly, - particularly years from now, it might make it sooner you will have to crank down settings to play. It's much easier to play Crysis 2 max at 1600x900. and on a relatively small(compared to desktop 27'' and 30'') 17, do you really get that much out of going 1080p?

On the other hand, going 1080p will give you more screen real estate when not gaming. This means a larger workspace, more desktop, more ground, more productivity, and that certainly is also a good argument for going it.





If it was me personally; Since Skyrim and BF3 are the most taxing games I am looking forward too, I imagine that I would go full 1080p and be an optimist, that cranking down resolution wouldn't be too bad in the coming years.
 
Are there any decent 13/14" laptops that would be suitable for moderate gaming? Probably wouldn't want to spend more than $1200 but I haven't looked at laptops in awhile so I don't know what the situation is with them.
 
Thanks Vigilant.

Anyone on the 6990m question?

Does it have the possibility to switch to the cpu integrated gpu for enhanced battery life?

And, always about the screen, i was wondering if the 1600x900 one is inferior in quality (gamut, viewing angles) to the Full HD upgrade or not.
If they are the same i'll surely go with the 1600x900 one.


Mairu said:
Are there any decent 13/14" laptops that would be suitable for moderate gaming? Probably wouldn't want to spend more than $1200 but I haven't looked at laptops in awhile so I don't know what the situation is with them.

Alienware m14x.
 
Principe Nero said:
Alienware m14x.

Best option? I had the same question coming into this thread. I have a boss gaming PC but I do travel at times and it would be nice to play some games like Borderlands and Guild Wars II on the go.
 
Principe Nero said:
Thanks Vigilant.

Anyone on the 6990m question?

Does it have the possibility to switch to the cpu integrated gpu for enhanced battery life?

And, always about the screen, i was wondering if the 1600x900 one is inferior in quality (gamut, viewing angles) to the Full HD upgrade or not.
If they are the same i'll surely go with the 1600x900 one.




Alienware m14x.
Is that the only option? I really don't like Alienware :(
 
M14x

Genuine Windows® 7 Home Premium, 64bit, English
Intel® Core™ i7 2630QM 2.0GHz (2.9GHz w/Turbo Boost, 6MB Cache)
8GB Dual Channel DDR3 at 1600MHz
3.0GB DDR3 NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 555M using NVIDIA Optimus™ technology
500GB 7200RPM SATA 3Gb/s
14.0" High Def+ (900p/1600x900) with WLED backlight
Internal Bluetooth 3.0

I configured this for $1,559.00 (I'm really just trying to stay under $1,600 before taxes).

Also, is Maingear any good?
 
ShdwDrake said:
Best option? I had the same question coming into this thread. I have a boss gaming PC but I do travel at times and it would be nice to play some games like Borderlands and Guild Wars II on the go.

Don't know if there's something similar for less price, but i like Alienware and i'm quite sure there are not better gpu than the gtx 555m on a 14.

ShdwDrake said:
M14x

Genuine Windows® 7 Home Premium, 64bit, English
Intel® Core™ i7 2630QM 2.0GHz (2.9GHz w/Turbo Boost, 6MB Cache)
8GB Dual Channel DDR3 at 1600MHz
3.0GB DDR3 NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 555M using NVIDIA Optimus™ technology
500GB 7200RPM SATA 3Gb/s
14.0" High Def+ (900p/1600x900) with WLED backlight
Internal Bluetooth 3.0

I configured this for $1,559.00 (I'm really just trying to stay under $1,600 before taxes).

Also, is Maingear any good?

The 3gb VRAM on the 555m is useless, go with the 1.5 gb one and you'll be fine.
 
I've got a general question about the Nvidia laptop GPU's.

I've got a geforce gtx 560m in my laptop, does it perform much differently than the desktop geforce gtx 560? (what does the "m" mean other than the fact that its in a laptop?)
 
Still in market for a decent laptop for 2D game development that isn't shit. Around or above or under $700-$800 I'm a hardware dumbass but software expert.

I don't need a monster, just something that can cover my crazy multi tasking with development tools, art programs, and overly tabbed browsing all at the same time.

I'm down for upgrading RAM as well if it's a hood route to go.
 
Warm Machine said:
How is MSi as a brand? I was looking at getting a GE620DX.
Don't buy it. Many people were expecting it, but it turned out that this notebook has the worst version of the 555 graphics.

I'm buying HP dv6-6030 myself, which is almost the same price as 620DX here in Poland, but has far better gfx.
 
equil said:
I'm looking at getting this.
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=637440&SRCCODE

ASUS G74SX-XT1 Laptop Computer - Intel Core i7-2630QM 2.0GHz, 12GB DDR3, 500GB HDD, Blu-ray Player/DVDRW,3GB GDDR5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M,17.3" Full HD, Windows 7 Home Premium 64,1-Yr Warr./1-Yr Acc.

Is it good for the price? Or is there better, for around the same price?
Lord-Audie said:
i'm very tempted to get this too.

I was looking at this one:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834152266

but it seems that the ASUS is better.

I'll wait for Laptop-Gaf judgement.
At $1500, there is no better deal.

Mairu said:
Are there any decent 13/14" laptops that would be suitable for moderate gaming? Probably wouldn't want to spend more than $1200 but I haven't looked at laptops in awhile so I don't know what the situation is with them.
This will game respectably. But the 540M is around 40% slower than the M14x's 555M. Stilll though, the 540M can handle 720o with medium settings, and will usually outdo the consoles in multiplatform releases.
RelentlessRolento said:
Still in market for a decent laptop for 2D game development that isn't shit. Around or above or under $700-$800 I'm a hardware dumbass but software expert.

I don't need a monster, just something that can cover my crazy multi tasking with development tools, art programs, and overly tabbed browsing all at the same time.

I'm down for upgrading RAM as well if it's a hood route to go.

Last time you asked, I recommended this.
 
equil said:
I've got a general question about the Nvidia laptop GPU's.

I've got a geforce gtx 560m in my laptop, does it perform much differently than the desktop geforce gtx 560? (what does the "m" mean other than the fact that its in a laptop?)


general rule of thumb is mobile GPUs and desktop GPUs are NOT equivelent in performance, they may have similar architecture but generally mobile versions has lower clocks, shaders, memories..etc. some are even using architectures from previous generations.

I believe 560m is based on 460m with some tweaks. The GTX580m overvolted is probably closer to GTX560 Ti in terms of performance.

edit: m means mobile.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-560M.48313.0.html
 
Tron999 said:
What's wrong with the 3GB of RAM?

There's nothing wrong, it's simply not worth the premium, cause nearly no game use more than 1 gb of VRAM and with the couple of them that could take advantage of it (GTAIV, Crysis 2...) you'll run short of horsepower before you'li run short of memory.
 
Are illuminated keyboards standard on the ASUS G53SX/SW models? I don't seem to see any mention of it on the sites that sell them, but the ASUS site implies it.

Also, I guess the SX is newer but has been getting a few unfavorable reviews compared to the SW? Apparently the SX has a "better" video card (560m vs 460m) but the card itself is 128bit so the 192 bit 460m in the SW performs better?
 
RelentlessRolento said:
Still in market for a decent laptop for 2D game development that isn't shit. Around or above or under $700-$800 I'm a hardware dumbass but software expert.

I don't need a monster, just something that can cover my crazy multi tasking with development tools, art programs, and overly tabbed browsing all at the same time.

I'm down for upgrading RAM as well if it's a hood route to go.
I was going to make a post, but this one seems to have criteria I can work within . . .
K.Jack said:
... so I take it this would be a good option for me.

I've never had a laptop before, so I was wondering if the insurance options that came up were worth it.
 
K.Jack said:

1366x768 is not great for a 15.6" screen, and particularly for software development you really want a higher resolution than that.


Master Milk said:
I was going to make a post, but this one seems to have criteria I can work within . . .

... so I take it this would be a good option for me.

I've never had a laptop before, so I was wondering if the insurance options that came up were worth it.

First thing you should decide is size and battery life. For example a 17" 3Kg beast of a laptop with 1.5 hour battery life would be a terrible fit for someone in college carrying it around from class to class, but wonderful for someone who mainly uses it at home but takes it on a trip every now and then.
 
Massa said:
1366x768 is not great for a 15.6" screen, and particularly for software development you really want a higher resolution than that.

First thing you should decide is size and battery life. For example a 17" 3Kg beast of a laptop with 1.5 hour battery life would be a terrible fit for someone in college carrying it around from class to class, but wonderful for someone who mainly uses it at home but takes it on a trip every now and then.
Hmm, yea, I'd like to be able to go out with it without having to worry about the battery constantly. So, I'd need something a moderate size instead of really large? I couldn't handle some really tiny screen.
 
risk said:
My BF and I are looking at laptops on Amazon and noticed that the free 360 deal was still going on. These are the two laptops that it came down to.

Lenovo Y570

Aspire TimelineX 3830TG

I guess the main differences would be the screen size and the GPU. I was wondering if the Timeline X would be okay for me? I play a lot of pick up and go type of games like Luminix and Plants vs Zombies, but I also play Fallout 3 and LOTRO from time to time, plus my BF just bought me Borderlands on Steam. I'm coming from a XPS 1530 and it was pretty big and hefty so I guess I'm also taking that into consideration. I'm leaning towards the Timeline X (more so for the weight), but I also want the best bang for buck so I'm hesitating a bit.

edit: I could also go for the x120/121 netbook, if I were to get the Y570.

The Y560 was complete shit, but the Y570 is looking like it's holding together so far. The numpad is nice but I'm not sure if I like losing the width on the return key. The build quality and screen quality seems greatly improved. Optimus is nice but it still seems like it needs to be refined a bit. I've noticed oddities with games like minecraft. For the price range the Y570 can't be beat. Most gaming laptops are of laughably bad value, this is one of the few laptops that is actually priced like they know they're customers aren't morons.
 
Master Milk said:
Hmm, yea, I'd like to be able to go out with it without having to worry about the battery constantly. So, I'd need something a moderate size instead of really large? I couldn't handle some really tiny screen.

You don't need a tiny screen, in terms of battery life there are great options in the 14" or 15.6" range (even 17" if you're willing to pay the premium). You just need to keep these things in mind when shopping for a laptop instead of focusing just on raw performance, like you would when buying a desktop computer.
 
^That Toshiba will be fine for movies and internet, but 17" is a bit large.

Massa said:
1366x768 is not great for a 15.6" screen, and particularly for software development you really want a higher resolution than that.
I was sorta assuming it will be hooked up to a monitor or TV.
Shambles said:
The Y560 was complete shit, but the Y570 is looking like it's holding together so far. The numpad is nice but I'm not sure if I like losing the width on the return key. The build quality and screen quality seems greatly improved. Optimus is nice but it still seems like it needs to be refined a bit. I've noticed oddities with games like minecraft. For the price range the Y570 can't be beat. Most gaming laptops are of laughably bad value, this is one of the few laptops that is actually priced like they know they're customers aren't morons.
Would you mind getting me a 3DMark Vantage score for that 555M?
 
Massa said:
You don't need a tiny screen, in terms of battery life there are great options in the 14" or 15.6" range (even 17" if you're willing to pay the premium). You just need to keep these things in mind when shopping for a laptop instead of focusing just on raw performance, like you would when buying a desktop computer.
Hmm, ok. So I need to think about my own list of requirements specifically then.

Alright, let's see.

I'm a CS major, which is why I'm even considering the laptop, so I want to be able to program games on it. 2D is love. I have an interest in 3D games, but I have no 3D skills and probably won't get any anytime soon, so being able to do 3D art isn't as important. I wanted to learn how to make music in the coming months, so it being able to handle music programs would be nice.

I'm a student, so I'll want to be able to take it around with me a lot. Weight and size don't concern me when talking about portability, but battery life is probably an issue. Four hours seems like a good number, though I guess 3 would be alright.

I definitely want a bigger screen before a smaller one.

Hmm, and I'd like around $750, but I'd prefer something that does everything I want, so something above that isn't going to immediately scare me off.

Did I miss any major points? If not, then recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
 
Master Milk said:
Hmm, ok. So I need to think about my own list of requirements specifically then.

Alright, let's see.

I'm a CS major, which is why I'm even considering the laptop, so I want to be able to program games on it. 2D is love. I have an interest in 3D games, but I have no 3D skills and probably won't get any anytime soon, so being able to do 3D art isn't as important. I wanted to learn how to make music in the coming months, so it being able to handle music programs would be nice.

I'm a student, so I'll want to be able to take it around with me a lot. Weight and size don't concern me when talking about portability, but battery life is probably an issue. Four hours seems like a good number, though I guess 3 would be alright.

I definitely want a bigger screen before a smaller one.

Hmm, and I'd like around $750, but I'd prefer something that does everything I want, so something above that isn't going to immediately scare me off.

Did I miss any major points? If not, then recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
Too expensive?
 
AbsoluteZero said:
You might want to ask her opinion on size of the notebook. Alot of women want something dainty they can bring around easily.

The bigger the better!
Thats why she is with me... :D

So I can assume my computer is OK?
 
Originally Posted by randomkid:
Hey everyone, I know nothing about computers but I want to get a laptop with a 15" screen that is good enough to emulate Dragon Quest V on PS2 perfectly for $500. Battery life isn't a big deal. Can I do it?

this should do

Aggh I'm an idiot, I waited too long and now the price at the link has gone up. Any other suggestions?

For example, anything on this page that meets my needs?

http://www.techbargains.com/laptopcomputernotebookreview.cfm
 
How would this perform? It's the new Sony Z and it's got to be the sexiest laptop ever created (Sorry Apple). I doubt upgrading to an i7 would do much good. How would this run something like starcraft (a good benchmark for diablo 3?).

http://asia.cnet.com/i/r/2011/pg/62209710/sc001.jpg

Intel® Core™ i5-2410M processor (2.30GHz) with Turbo Boost up to 2.90GHz
Microsoft Windows® 7 Home Premium
Premium Carbon Fibre
4GB (2GB x2 fixed onboard) DDR3-SDRAM-1333
128GB (64GBx2) Solid State Drive with RAID 0 Technology
13.1" VAIO Premium Display (1600x900)
Standard Capacity Battery
Power Media Dock™ with AMD Radeon™ HD 6650M (1GB) graphics and CD/DVD player / burner
 
I'll be traveling for the next year and I need to upgrade from my Gateway FX P-7908. I want to get a smaller form factor this time.

I've decided to choose between the M14x and the Asus G53SW-XN1.
I can get the M14x for ~ $900 or the G53SW for $960.
The Asus is larger with about a 50% faster GPU, but I'm pretty sure it gets a 1/4 of the battery life of the M14x when just browsing.
Has anyone done a comparison of these two machines, or the M14x and any other gaming laptops?
I want the long battery life and small size since I'm going to be taking multiple international flights on a monthly basis as well as staying in hotels and austere conditions at regular intervals. (Don't ask)

I'll be using a simple logitech bluetooth mouse and the laptop keyboard and an Xbox360 controller for gaming.

Any other recommendations?
 
Master Milk said:
Nope, that seems pretty good if it hits all my targets. It looks like it doesn't come with an OS though? How does that work?
Anyone? Buy it now? Get it separately? Don't really need it? I know it's not that last one. <_<
 
Just got a new laptop, a Sony VAIO 14 notebook! Mainly for school but i still want to game on It so I'm not bored as shit waiting for classes. So can anyone recommend me some Addicting adventure games, shooters, simulation, rpg don't really care. Never gamed on a pc or laptop but here are the specs:

Intel core i3/2310M processor/2.10GHz
Intel hd graphics 3000
4gb ram
Windows 7
 
randomkid said:
Aggh I'm an idiot, I waited too long and now the price at the link has gone up. Any other suggestions?

For example, anything on this page that meets my needs?

http://www.techbargains.com/laptopcomputernotebookreview.cfm
The one at the top, with the i7-2630QM would work, but if you can spend that much, I'd buy this instead. Much more powerful GPU.

Mook1e said:
I'll be traveling for the next year and I need to upgrade from my Gateway FX P-7908. I want to get a smaller form factor this time.

I've decided to choose between the M14x and the Asus G53SW-XN1.
I can get the M14x for ~ $900 or the G53SW for $960.
The Asus is larger with about a 50% faster GPU, but I'm pretty sure it gets a 1/4 of the battery life of the M14x when just browsing.
Has anyone done a comparison of these two machines, or the M14x and any other gaming laptops?
I want the long battery life and small size since I'm going to be taking multiple international flights on a monthly basis as well as staying in hotels and austere conditions at regular intervals. (Don't ask)

I'll be using a simple logitech bluetooth mouse and the laptop keyboard and an Xbox360 controller for gaming.

Any other recommendations?
I'd choose the M14x, if you want battery life, along with decent gaming performance.

The GT 555M 192-bit is about equal to the 9800 GT.
 
K.Jack said:
^That Toshiba will be fine for movies and internet, but 17" is a bit large.


I was sorta assuming it will be hooked up to a monitor or TV.

Would you mind getting me a 3DMark Vantage score for that 555M?

P4793, GPU: 4163, CPU:8787

That was with the i5 model. When is futuremark going to clue in to be able to run benchmarks in typical 15" laptop resolutions?
 
K.Jack said:
The one at the top, with the i7-2630QM would work, but if you can spend that much, I'd buy this instead. Much more powerful GPU.


I'd choose the M14x, if you want battery life, along with decent gaming performance.

The GT 555M 192-bit is about equal to the 9800 GT.
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking.
The extra screen resolution of the Asus wouldn't completely negate the extra gpu horsepower, but it brings native gaming on each much closer to each other.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom