Joe said:
because they're not bitter, old, uptight people like yourself?
Hey, fuck you too, Yankee boy.
Look, reviews in general are of limited utility. The score is never as important as the rationale behind it, since ultimately it's up to you to decide whether you like the game enough to buy it. If my top three criteria are game length, difficulty factor, and sound, then a final game score isn't going to help me. The text of the article which discusses the reasons why that particular reviewer arrived at his/her score is what will ultimately be helpful.
Now, if you're interested in reviews just for the sake of reading reviews...well, that's Fanboy Land right there. Arguing over a tenth of a point difference between scores is completely pointless. What REALLY is the difference between 9.5 and 9.6, anyway? What does it MEAN that [fill in title of game #1] scored [higher | lower] than [fill in title of game #2]? Seriously -- if you enjoy that kind of stuff, why not just compare dick size with your friends? That data is just as useless, and at least you don't have to wait a half-hour to find out the answers.