Felix Lighter
Member
It will be a range of prices across their product lines. For gaming cards that should be from about $150 to around $700 and with a $1000 Titan level card on top of it all.
Giant Bomb #17 | Baby Dan Wyckert
- Thread starter Anjin M
- Start date
- Status
It will be a range of prices across their product lines. For gaming cards that should be from about $150 to around $700 and with a $1000 Titan level card on top of it all.
TheMrPliskin
Member
Extra life needs to be more than once a year just so that I can get more extended solo Austin streams. His stream from this year might actually be one of my favourite GB streams in recent memory.
Backfoggen
Banned
I'm in for the 1080Ti or whatever they're gonna call it.
Rise of the Tomb Raider review is out. Score:
4/5
ShadowSwordmaster
Banned
Pretty much what I expected.
skLaFarebear
Member
Unless you're Nintendo or Konami.
Jeff has talked about EA especially not sending them review copies of some games a few years ago because of that.
The Dear Leader
Banned
Yeah it's kind of funny compared to other review sites were a "good" score is usually 9 plus, when GB's good score is usually 4 at the most. I personally think the Game Informer scoring system is my favorite, the .25 interval lets you get a little more indepth with the numbering so it matches the text of a review better.
That was quick, thanks!
Bless.
I think so too
The Dear Leader
Banned
Is this referring to Vinny's stream? If so, that's great news.
Backfoggen
Banned
Jetlag is Jesus 2.
what is this about? better be Vinny stream!
Antiwhippy
the holder of the trombone
I don't understand how people are able to mathematically define a body of subjective text. The five star scale makes sense because it's just saying terrible, poor, average, good, fantastic. How do you even define that .25?
The Dear Leader
Banned
I've always been able to figure what number I want when I write a review on Steam, to me theres a difference between a 7.5 and 7.75, not a huge difference but I like having the flexability in numbering to match how I feel about a game, I don't think a 5 star system does that for me.
Like there are a lot of times were I don't think a game deserves 4 stars but deserves more than 3, it's all personal preference, I just think having a more open numbering system is easier to come up with a number to match the content of the review.
Bethesda makes RPG nerds REALLY fucking angry
Infinite Justice
Member
Sounds like Bethesda still being Bethesda with their broken ass engine.
At least they didn't hype it was a brand new engine like the Skyrim stuff.
At least they didn't hype it was a brand new engine like the Skyrim stuff.
stump sock
Member
isn't stopping reviews from saying "Fallout now in the Creation engine," even though all the console commands from FO3 still work, hah.
myggen's gonna get so many hits on that video
Listening to Jeff's whole Fallout 4 thing it sounds like it could be a 4/5 if he reviews the PC version, in other words if he reviews the version that isn't fucked. If he reviews the PS4/Xbone version it sounds like a 3/5 to me. Might warrant two scores.
At this point it doesn't seem like Bethesda will ever move away from that engine.
At this point it doesn't seem like Bethesda will ever move away from that engine.
No doubt Vinny is already on this, but it seems like Youtube's live stream archiver can screw up with streams longer than 2hrs, but it's recoverable if you get in touch with product support https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!msg/youtube/xmoWw6K7oW4/xYqk0y5JN5oJ
fao: Dan, Brad, Jeff - shoot this to Vinny if he hasn't already got it sorted
fao: Dan, Brad, Jeff - shoot this to Vinny if he hasn't already got it sorted
Yes. It's reviewing well.
This is even better.
stump sock
Member
for some reason the PC version has the lowest metacritic of all 3 versions which is funny.
but yeah it sounds like it's a bad idea to buy it on console if you have even a modest pc
I think he said in the quick look that he was reviewing the ps4 version. Not sure if he plans on doing another review though for pc
forgeforsaken
Member
This presupposes that the PC version isn't fucked, and while the framerate would certainly be better it's still a Bethesda game, so of course it's going to be somewhat fucked on PC too.
What is a modest PC these days anyways? I have a 560 Ti, for example.
Antiwhippy
the holder of the trombone
At least with the PC version you know there will be someone to fix their bullshit.
Not that it excuses them.
Though I do wonder how much of the jank is from how easy it is to mod.
Infinite Justice
Member
LOL
Apparently not, especially if it makes mad bank again.
That PS3 version of Skyrim was a fucking travesty but yet they sold a fuck ton regardless
more likely gonna continue my trend of getting the PC version these games when its like 75% off a few years from now (and still not play them)
This is the trend for most multiplatform games. On PC they tend to review lower.
Backfoggen
Banned
The "time till consoles are calculators" definitely was shorter this gen.
Digital Foundry tested on a 750ti, which outperformed consoles, but not by a massive margin.
stump sock
Member
that Digital Foundry article ran theirs on an i3 with 8gb ram and a 750 (a budget card) and it averaged over 30fps on high.
I have an i5 with 16gb and a 660ti and it will probably tear it apart, and it wasn't really a powerhouse when I built it 2+ years ago.
Antiwhippy
the holder of the trombone
I feel like I might soon have to upgrade.
Sandy bridge i5, hd6850 and 4gb of ram.
Sandy bridge i5, hd6850 and 4gb of ram.
stump sock
Member
the processor is probably fine, get yourself some ram asap, and maybe consider a video card at some point
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked