I honestly think I prefer creepy gaf than what's going on in this thread right now.
Yeah.
I've typed and deleted-before-posting so many replies just because I don't want to further crud up the thread with this garbage.
I honestly think I prefer creepy gaf than what's going on in this thread right now.
a disparity in resolution that, while it may look enormous by the numbers, is not dramatically perceptible to the eye in real-world circumstances.
I don't know how Brad continues to read this thread. I don't have a dog in this fight and reading the last few pages have left me wanting to put a bullet in my brain.
I mean... given the amount of flesh-eating bug stories he brings to the podcast it's hardly surprising that he's attracted to misery.
Quick Look: Typing of the Dead: Overkill
The characters don't have keyboards attached to them. Instant disappointment.
This post is also pretty perceptive.
Who said I never post anything nice in here?
Set down your agenda for a second and let's try a little critical thinking. Patrick is either
-dismissing an issue out of hand because he and he alone doesn't have the hardware to tell the difference, or
-applying his own example to illustrate why technical minutiae is somewhere around eighth on the list of factors that will determine the success of these consoles, as it's always been
Mainstream video game consumers do not give a FUCK about the resolution of their games compared to price, brand loyalty, peripheral features, exclusives, and which system their friends are playing on. All of those things are more important to people who don't post on Internet forums than a disparity in resolution that, while it may look enormous by the numbers, is not dramatically perceptible to the eye in real-world circumstances.
I'd argue this maxim even extends to places like GAF. Numerous PS3 multiplats were lower res or performed worse than their 360 counterparts last generation. If you're a Sony fan who prefers the PlayStation environment, raise your hand if you let that stop you from playing those games on the PS3. I'd bet money there aren't a lot of you.
I bought a PS3 to play the superior versions of Bayonetta
You've talked multiple times about hooking up a PC to a TV to get 1080p.
When were you talking shit, then or now?
what
don't be rude
especially not on halloween
the ghosts will get you
I bought a 360 to play the superior versions of games like Bayonetta and AC 2, B and R.
How about you set down your agenda of pretending consumers won't care about a large difference in hardware power between two new consoles launched at the same time where the more powerful console is actually cheaper. Something that has never happened before.
Hardcore gamers care about 720p vs 1080p, and their choice of console in turn affects their mainstream friends. Thus even if you don't care about resolution, you decide on a console based on resolution by proxy.
There, I solved it for y'all!
360 of course. Silly typo.
I bought a 360 to play the superior versions of games like Bayonetta
Watching the BF4 QL now. the ending to the SP stuff. A crash exit to desktop. damn.
I like my PC for high IQ gaming but Ive experienced freezes and crashes like that myself. More reason Im waiting for the new consoles. Raise the bar to get close to the PC without the PCs wrinkles.
Are you 12? I can see why brad would hate to post here.You've talked multiple times about hooking up a PC to a TV to get 1080p.
When were you talking shit, then or now?
At any rate, if you're going to keep being an asshole then don't bother responding or I'm gonna make my inaugural use of GAF's ignore function. I've had enough of it.
Are you 12? I can see why brad would hate to post here.
Also lol at people thinking consumers buy based on specs/resolution, only on gaf. Funnily enough people buy consoles to play the games they want.
So then why did I spend the entire generation owning only a Wii and DS?
Also, the "masses" couldn't tell that widescreen was better for them than fullscreen for years. I somehow doubt they'll get the difference between 720 and 1080, especially when neither of the big companies will be heralding it and a 1/3 of the people on this forum couldn't tell the difference in released video.
You make me sick.I bought a 360 because, at the time, games like Vesperia and Blue Dragon appealed to me more.
Then I bought a PS3 because I like video games and wanted to play the ones I was missing.
I can see why brad would hate to post here.
What the fuck? hahahaha.i'm mad as hell and i'm not gonna take this anymore
I speak to people fine, last week I did too, you were just irritated because instead of answering your question, which I'd answered on the page before, I was sarcastic. If you'd used the forum, the same way everyone else on GAF does, you'd have never asked your question, and I'd have never replied.You continue to not understand how to talk to people like a well adjusted adult, but I'll do you the courtesy of answering anyway.
You might be on to something if those are the things you'd specified. You said, multiple times, 1080p, it's something you know for a fact you've mentioned wanting. Now you also probably know I'm not going to listen through months of podcasts to get a direct quote, so I can't prove you wrong, but you know that you are. You could argue you were just using it to mean better visuals, and maybe you were, but a listener can't be expected to interpret into your comments, we only have what you say, not what you mean.You might be onto something if higher resolution were the only reason to play on PC, and not in addition to frame rate, graphical effects, price, and flexibility.
Why does this matter? Surely the news is for people who want to buy Call of Duty Ghosts? The news story is the game, not the consoles.Also, the post you quoted was entirely about which factors are gonna influence these machines' potential for success in general, not what my own personal preferences are.
By all means, that is what the function is for.I guess you were so hasty to get a dig in at me that you didn't stop to realize you don't actually have a point here.
At any rate, if you're going to keep being an asshole then don't bother responding or I'm gonna make my inaugural use of GAF's ignore function. I've had enough of it.
GB does things differently, it's not hard to get. If there's a news story that's already on a billion sites/forums they don't see the need to have that on their page as well.
"I fail to see what the big deal is? We barely run any news. Giant Bomb is not a one stop shop. Never has been, never will be.Llamas." this comment is very pretentious. You act like you started and made GB what it is today when the fact is you have been with them what, 2 years? Most of your content bores people to tears as well. I'd advise to just do your job and shutup and be lucky you still have a job. Even more so when you work from home now.
Anonymous asked
I don't see how a comment like this is "killing it."
When this news story is currently on the front page of Giant Bomb and a billion other sites.
http://www.giantbomb.com/articles/sony-s-massive-ps4-faq-has-lots-of-details/1100-4774/
I don't see how a comment like this is "killing it."
When this news story is currently on the front page of Giant Bomb and a billion other sites.
http://www.giantbomb.com/articles/sony-s-massive-ps4-faq-has-lots-of-details/1100-4774/
Hardcore gamers care about 720p vs 1080p, and their choice of console in turn affects their mainstream friends. Thus even if you don't care about resolution, you decide on a console based on resolution by proxy.
There, I solved it for y'all!
So, is the article that's going to be pointed to for the next five year so people can scream, "SEE! GIANTBOMB ARE M$ FANBOYS! PLUS THEY DIDN'T PLAY A DEPRESSING HORROR GAME RIGHT AFTER THE DEATH OF ONE OF THEIR CLOSEST FRIENDS! BAIS!"
So, is the article that's going to be pointed to for the next five year so people can scream, "SEE! GIANTBOMB ARE M$ FANBOYS! PLUS THEY DIDN'T PLAY A DEPRESSING HORROR GAME RIGHT AFTER THE DEATH OF ONE OF THEIR CLOSEST FRIENDS! BAIS!"
So, is the article that's going to be pointed to for the next five year so people can scream, "SEE! GIANTBOMB ARE M$ FANBOYS! PLUS THEY DIDN'T PLAY A DEPRESSING HORROR GAME RIGHT AFTER THE DEATH OF ONE OF THEIR CLOSEST FRIENDS! BAIS!"
Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow.
Not even sure where you were going with that mate but I'm pretty sure it wasn't where you intended.
Okay, I'm out. This topic can't be discussed without becoming offensive. Let this thread remain a place of sunshine and rainbows forever more.So, is the article that's going to be pointed to for the next five year so people can scream, "SEE! GIANTBOMB ARE M$ FANBOYS! PLUS THEY DIDN'T PLAY A DEPRESSING HORROR GAME RIGHT AFTER THE DEATH OF ONE OF THEIR CLOSEST FRIENDS! BAIS!"
Because it's a bigger story containing a lot more new information?