GIGACHAD Karl Jobst files for bankruptcy and transfers ownership of properties to wife, loser Billy Mitchell nets negative $350,000 from lawsuit

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm a person tangentially invested in this story, as I find it relevant to my interests. Based on what I know, I sympathize with Jobst and am unsympathetic to Mitchell.
Were you sympathetic towards him when he was bragging on Discord about how he'd purposely spent a fortune on lawyers so that Mitchell would have to pay for it?
 
I read that as his wife was co-owner of those properties and bought out his half, no? Seems legit to me.

Bought him out - cheaply - AFTER the judgement.
Even if she was the co-owner, it's still his equity which he'd be shielding from the judgement.

I suspect this would not fly when a judge looks at it.
 
Bought him out - cheaply - AFTER the judgement.
Even if she was the co-owner, it's still his equity which he'd be shielding from the judgement.

I suspect this would not fly when a judge looks at it.
it absolutely would not fly under American law.

No clue about Australian law.
 
Plot twist.

E-cat is Karl Jobst
 
Calling it 'frivolous' when you know the lawsuit was because he was accused of causing someone's suicide…and when you know he proved to the court that the defamatory claim cost him money?
What really cost him money was suing Karl Jobst, and this was the best-case scenario. I don't care what financial damage there was beyond him already being a known cheater prior to said defamation. Billy is an immoral person who has hurt many people through similar practices (whether or not his lawsuit was justified here), so I won't lose sleep over it.
No they didn't.
Jobst has no right to do any of it. Calling them names and making shit up. Are you 12?
Exposing people who are defrauding others of money for 'cancer research'? Exposing cheaters? There's nothing wrong with that.

Making shit up would of course not be okay, can you point to an example?
Were you sympathetic towards him when he was bragging on Discord about how he'd purposely spent a fortune on lawyers so that Mitchell would have to pay for it?
Yes.
 
Last edited:
Are we applauding fraud now?
What was done was within the confines of the law, according to Australian lawyers. Some people in this thread are calling them fraudulent. I don't have the expertise to determine that, but Occam's razor says the lawyers probably know more what they're talking about than the randos here.
 
He wiped out nearly $100K in credit card & tax debt, has a lucrative YT channel and, through his wife, is in possession of two properties totaling almost $2M AUD. Billy net lost $350,000 USD.
Translation: shlurp, schlup, schlurp....

Get a fucking room.
 
What was done was within the confines of the law, according to Australian lawyers. Some people in this thread are calling them fraudulent. I don't have the expertise to determine that, but Occam's razor says the lawyers probably know more what they're talking about than the randos here.
In my country this is fraud and my country is a shithole.
 
This youtubers nuts couldnt be further down your throat if you tried lol
OP, I know this is personal but are you sexually attracted to Jobst?
It's the only sane thing I can think of to explain this thread.
I think he's doing my ideal job and there's some admiration in that, but I view the dissection of my psychoanalytic profile ITT as profoundly uninteresting.
In my country this is fraud and my country is a shithole.
Lawful fraud or lawless justice? You decide.
Losing all your assets to your wife is a win case. Never in mankind history has a woman left a broke man, it's fine.
The same thing occurred to me. However, according to studies the only thing more sexually appealing to a woman than a man's wealth is a man's ability to make wealth. I predict a long and illustrious YT career for Jobst, making it less likely that his wife will abandon him. Or, you know, they may actually love each other. But it would be funny.
 
Last edited:
The same thing occurred to me. However, according to studies the only thing more sexually appealing to a woman than a man's wealth is a man's ability to make wealth. I predict a long and illustrious YT career for Jobst, making it less likely that his wife will abandon him. Or, you know, they may actually love each other. But it would be funny.
Get help.
 
Jobst manipulated his audience pretending the trial was about Mitchell's fake records.

I'd rather be in the side of someone who cheats in videogames over someone who lost a defamation case and then tries to weasel out of it through fraud.
 
I will be sure to make that thread if it ever happens.

Which part of those innocuous and fairly obvious observations got so under your skin that you decided to make it personal? The response in this thread in interesting, clearly people are getting butthurt. It's pretty entertaining.
The demented sentence that I quoted.
 
The whole sentence? Which part do you disagree with / find objectionable?
Every word but in bold the most bizarre/creepy/incomprehensible:


The same thing occurred to me. However, according to studies the only thing more sexually appealing to a woman than a man's wealth is a man's ability to make wealth. I predict a long and illustrious YT career for Jobst, making it less likely that his wife will abandon him. Or, you know, they may actually love each other. But it would be funny
 
Every word but in bold the most bizarre/creepy/incomprehensible:


The same thing occurred to me. However, according to studies the only thing more sexually appealing to a woman than a man's wealth is a man's ability to make wealth. I predict a long and illustrious YT career for Jobst, making it less likely that his wife will abandon him. Or, you know, they may actually love each other. But it would be funny
Well, ok, let's break that down. People in this thread are suggesting that Jobst' wife will abandon him after assuming ownership of his assets -- which, let's be frank, is a feasible scenario in today's world. Such women are usually what's known as "gold diggers". Being gold diggers, they're typically unable of making money themselves; hence, if she truly is a gold digger, she is exponentially more likely to stick with Jobst should he continue making money off of his YT videos -- which I deem likely, since he's still getting hundreds of thousands of views per video. I also suggested they may love each other, a wholesome notion. I make no probability judgement on the likelihood of either scenario.

Lastly, I quip that it would be funny (in a Shakespearean tragedy kind of way!) if his wife left him -- and you clutch your pearls. Lest you forget, you have been all up in my ass ITT accusing me of being an obsessed fanboy, emotionally involved, stanning for a guy who wouldn't likely piss on me if I were on fire. So, which is it, Mr. Hypocrite? Am I a fanboy or a callous psychopath?
 
Last edited:
Well, ok, let's break that down. People in this thread are suggesting that Jobst' wife will abandon him after assuming ownership of his assets -- which, let's be frank, is a feasible scenario in today's world. Such women are usually what's known as "gold diggers". Being gold diggers, they're typically unable of making money themselves; hence, if she truly is a gold digger, she is exponentially more likely to stick with Jobst should he continue making money off of his YT videos -- which I deem likely, since he's still getting hundreds of thousands of views per video. I also suggested they may love each other, a wholesome notion. I make no probability judgement on the likelihood of either scenario.

Lastly, I quip that it would be funny (in a Shakespearean tragedy kind of way!) if his wife left him -- and you clutch your pearls. Lest you forget, you have been all over my ass ITT accusing me of being an obsessed fanboy, emotionally involved, stanning for a guy who wouldn't likely piss on me if I were on fire. So, which is it, Mr. Hypocrite? Am I a fanboy or a callous psychopath?
I just have no idea why on earth you created this thread and find the amount of knowledge you have on this guy, the amount of attention and emotion to dedicate to him utterly bizarre. The all the stuff about his wife and marriage is creepy as fuck, I really have no idea what on earth your obsession is all about.

So, to answer your final question, there's lot of fanboy and more than a hint of psychopath.
 
I used to like Jobst but the fact of the matter is he lied to his fanbase to get financial support for the trial. Not only that but he lied knowing that the truth would eventually come out after the case was over, and to me that makes it even worse.
He's slimey.
 
I just have no idea why on earth you created this thread and find the amount of knowledge you have on this guy, the amount of attention and emotion to dedicate to him utterly bizarre. The all the stuff about his wife and marriage is creepy as fuck, I really have no idea what on earth your obsession is all about.

So, to answer your final question, there's lot of fanboy and more than a hint of psychopath.
I'm highly intelligent and retain a lot of information, which is probably why it seems like I'm more invested than I actually am. But the saga does interest me, and I root for Karl. It's not rocket science.

Someone else brought up his wife leaving him, which I merely replied that I don't find it likely. Ok, enough about me. I'm not that interesting, trust me.
 
Plot twist.

E-cat is Karl Jobst
The first post certainly reads like it could be written by someone suffering MH issues a lost legal case forcing bankruptcy could cause...

Maybe unfair but for those of us with a cursory to zero interest it comes off a tad unhinged.
 
Last edited:
This reads like Jobst moved assets to avoid paying Billy. I would imagine if a judge determines that's what he was doing, that can be reversed.
Everything was done in accordance with the law per the bankruptcy trustee. After the trustee takes ownership of the assets, the spouse is allowed to buy out the co-owned properties of the bankrupted party before all other considerations, including creditors' debts, if they have the funds -- which she did.

NCIeIQMvoEBUmcKr.png

9OL1a6BDx2kO2PAB.png
 
Last edited:
I feel like I said this in the past, but Jobst is a soft soy boy while Billy Mitchell is an all time alpha chad who's married to a titcow. This was a big nature is healing moment.
 
I feel like I said this in the past, but Jobst is a soft soy boy while Billy Mitchell is an all time alpha chad who's married to a titcow. This was a big nature is healing moment.
Screwing oneself out of $350,000 is a certified alpha chad move. But, hey, at least he's got bragging rights
 
Last edited:
I'm highly intelligent and retain a lot of information
In general, I find that when someone attempts to convince others of their intellect, it's generally not a good sign that said intellect is present. Not saying it's untrue, just offering a bit of advice about how that comes off to others, though I'd imagine that's not a concern for you based on your behavior with this thread.


Ok, enough about me. I'm not that interesting, trust me.
This, I agree with. Perhaps the only sane thing you've said in this thread.

Leave the fella alone folks, he's just another internet warrior who invests more of his time than he should into the events of pseudo celebrities, (surely the mark of an ascendant mind.) This is his Jersey Shore, so let him scream into the ether. If you find this.....person...... as unhinged and uninteresting as he most assuredly is, and most of you in this thread seem to be implying as much, just ignore him and go about your lives. Arguing with trolls only emboldens them, and the thicker skulled ones are impervious to other view points ever penetrating their dense force fields of willful stupidity. Ignoring individuals like this is far more productive than attempting to converse with them, and you can bank on that advice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom