Support NeoGAF

[TintoConCasera]

Bill is going to take Karl's ugly wife along with all his properties lmao.

I am? I have never seen those, I did not even know I had a presence beyond NeoGAF. Care to link to 'em?

Can't do, didn't save the image. It was a collage of some of your posts from multiple places with the usual crying wojak next to them. Nothing extraordinary, but people seem to have taken notice of you.

 

[E-Cat]

I'll stand on the side of socially awkward nerds trying to self-improve over Billy Mitchell any day of the year.

 

[ecosse_011172]

Uuuhhhhhh, I'm thinking you got it backwards??

Billy Mitchell, the Chad. Long flowing locks. Known galaxy wide as the All Time Reigning Champion of Donkey Kong. Arcade Version. He plays mono a mono. In person. Face to face. Skin to skin. He assaults all 5 sense. Vision - hair. Smell - Bleu de Chanel, 15 sprays minimum. Sound - sonorous vocal tones, celebrating a hard earned World Championship. Touch - Chanel Body Lotion. Applied every 82 minutes. Taste - this is a gaming forum. Not going here when kids might be reading. Implied though.

The cuck Karl. Stays indoors. Skin is translucent because of it. Makes YouTube videos with a phone camera. Does research all night instead of hanging out in arcades, honing his craft, working to be a global champion of something.


I think the choice is FUCKING CLEAR GAF

I hope the "mono a mono" is an intentional pun but judging by the rest, I suspect not.

 

[The Cockatrice]

I hate Mondays.

 

[simpatico]

I hope the "mono a mono" is an intentional pun but judging by the rest, I suspect not.

I'm guessing you don't spend much time in arcades.

 

[ecosse_011172]

I'm guessing you don't spend much time in arcades.

No, apart from when on holiday in Japan, not in decades.
Could you explain?

 

[E-Cat]

Are you his wife?

I'm a person tangentially invested in this story, as I find it relevant to my interests. Based on what I know, I sympathize with Jobst and am unsympathetic to Mitchell.

Can't do, didn't save the image. It was a collage of some of your posts from multiple places with the usual crying wojak next to them. Nothing extraordinary, but people seem to have taken notice of you.

Oh man, that's gold hahaha!

 

[Ozriel]

Everything was done in accordance with the law per the bankruptcy trustee. After the trustee takes ownership of the assets, the spouse is allowed to buy out the bankrupted party's properties before all other considerations, including creditors' debts, if they have the funds -- which she did.

Another expert in Australian law, I see. Karl did his due diligence.

again; there is no western country where it is 'illegal' for you to give your mum 99% of your assets just before you file for divorce.

there is also a reason why most men know that this route will not work when it shows up before a judge.

 

[Meraxes]

I doubt OP is a lawyer let alone a lawyer in Australia. He likely doesn't know the law at all and is just fanboying over a loser who just lost his family's lifesavings.

 

[E-Cat]

again; there is no western country where it is 'illegal' for you to give your mum 99% of your assets just before you file for divorce.

there is also a reason why most men know that this route will not work when it shows up before a judge.

Shady financial actions taken before filing for a divorce and legal actions taken after filing for a bankruptcy doesn't seem comparable.

 

[Major Insano]

The cuck Karl.

It might be that his only way out of this is to raise Billy's kids..

 

[spookyfish]

I hate Mondays.

Tell me why ...

 

[Fahdis]

Australia has gamers? Thought you people were too busy surviving nature there to have time for this shit.

 

[ecosse_011172]

Australia has gamers? Thought you people were too busy surviving nature there to have time for this shit.

 

[E-Cat]

I doubt OP is a lawyer let alone a lawyer in Australia. He likely doesn't know the law at all

You're correct, I am not a lawyer in Australia, neither are you. Do you know who is? Lawyers in Australia. This is what they had to say to Jobst about the legality of the actions taken:

and is just fanboying over a loser who just lost his family's lifesavings.

He wiped out nearly $100K in credit card & tax debt, has a lucrative YT channel and, through his wife, is in possession of two properties totaling almost $2M AUD. Billy net lost $350,000 USD.

 

[Skifi28]

 

[sono]

Let's remind ourselves

I obviously missed the first memo, this doesnt ring any bells at all..

 

[FinalBossWithTheMostPower]

 

[E-Cat]

I obviously missed the first memo, this doesnt ring any bells at all..

I express my condolences over your having missed out on the saga & wasting your time in a thread where you lack the context of knowing what's going on...

 

[Meraxes]

You're correct, I am not a lawyer in Australia, neither are you. Do you know who is? Lawyers in Australia. This is what they had to say to Jobst about the legality of the actions taken:

He wiped out nearly $100K in credit card & tax debt, has a lucrative YT channel and, through his wife, is in possession of two properties totaling almost $2M AUD. Billy net lost $350,000 USD.

Yeah just like his chatGPT lawyer who said his defense against the defamation lawsuit was a slam dunk for Karl. You have no clue how the law works and are just taking text from a picture as scripture.

 

[The Cockatrice]

Tell me why ...

 

[E-Cat]

Yeah just like his chatGPT lawyer who said his defamation lawsuit was a slam dunk for Karl.

Citation needed.

Generally, the defendant doesn't have a choice in the matter of engaging in the lawsuit...

You have no clue how the law works and are just taking text from a picture as scripture.

It is, however, a material statement from an Australian lawyer intimately familiar with the details of the case. What do you have?

 

[Ozriel]

Shady financial actions taken before filing for a divorce and legal actions taken after filing for a bankruptcy doesn't seem comparable.

Both are shady moves to hide assets away from consideration. Both are unlikely to work.

You're correct, I am not a lawyer in Australia, neither are you. Do you know who is? Lawyers in Australia. This is what they had to say to Jobst about the legality of the actions taken:

He wiped out nearly $100K in credit card & tax debt, has a lucrative YT channel and, through his wife, is in possession of two properties totaling almost $2M AUD. Billy net lost $350,000 USD.

So Jobst wrote an email to the same trustee he used to pull this shit off and the person wrote back to assure him that the shady shit he pulled off is not shady?

And this is your proof?

 

[Portugeezer]

Snake Jobst being a snake.

Never forget how he manipulated his audience.

 

[E-Cat]

Both are shady moves to hide assets away from consideration. Both are unlikely to work.



So Jobst wrote an email to the same trustee he used to pull this shit off and the person wrote back to assure him that the shady shit he pulled off is not shady?

And this is your proof?

I guess I'll be waiting for your thread "CUCK KARL JOBST GOES TO PRISON OVER FRAUD IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS". Until then, it is my assessment that he likely did his due diligence, especially in light of being more careful with his actions following the lawsuit.

 

[Ozriel]

Are you his wife?

He wishes.

Citation needed.

Generally, the defendant doesn't have a choice in the matter of engaging in the lawsuit...

It was actually his choice, since all he had to do was apologize and retract.
Instead he doubled down.

It is, however, a material statement from an Australian lawyer intimately familiar with the details of the case. What do you have?

A lawyer who just happens to be the trustee he used for this scheme?

I guess I'll be waiting for your thread "CUCK KARL JOBST GOES TO PRISON OVER FRAUD IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS". Until then, it is my assessment that he likely did his due diligence, especially in light of being more careful with his actions following the lawsuit.

Wild post, since you already admitted he didn't do his due diligence before making the defamatory statements, then happily went to court with the idea he was going to win.

 

[ecosse_011172]

He wiped out nearly $100K in credit card & tax debt, has a lucrative YT channel and, through his wife, is in possession of two properties totaling almost $2M AUD. Billy net lost $350,000 USD.

Then you're stanning for a guy who is worth million and likely wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

 

[Meraxes]

Citation needed.

Generally, the defendant doesn't have a choice in the matter of engaging in the lawsuit...

It is, however, a material statement from an Australian lawyer intimately familiar with the details of the case. What do you have?

You can find images of Jobst bragging about the responses he got from chatGPT about the lawsuit, and saying Billy has no standing.

I guess we'll have to wait and see when Billy takes him to court again. I've seen a lot of divorces where one side tries to hide/obfuscate marital assets during/afterwards and judges tend to not take kindly to that. Like selling your assets greatly under market prices.

 

[Meraxes]

Then you're stanning for a guy who is worth million and likely wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

OP is likely a child and doesn't know any better

 

[diffusionx]

I'm not a lawyer but I would find it tough to believe that in Australia or any other common law system, you can legally transfer assets to your spouse at a fire sale price to escape judgements and/or creditors. It just doesn't make any sense and it would be something that would be abused so much that the legislature would stop people from doing it.

Jobst has a long history of making stuff up to give red meat to his followers about how he is destroying Mitchell and then getting BTFO when that stuff gets in front of a judge. Color me skeptical.

 

[E-Cat]

It was actually his choice, since all he had to do was apologize and retract.
Instead he doubled down.

He did retract and apologize, but put it at the end of an unrelated video. Mitchell didn't view the retraction as sufficient, so proceeded with the lawsuit. Jobst was definitely not intelligent about covering his ass.

Wild post, since you already admitted he didn't do his due diligence before making the defamatory statements, then happily went to court with the idea he was going to win.

Seems simplistic to imply that since he didn't do his due diligence that one time (though being a really methodological dude otherwise) that that's definitely the case this time around. In the video in the OP he also goes into why he was showing bravado during the lawsuit, saying it was partly cope due to not being able to bear the thought of losing. In a position like that, it's probably pscyhologically prudent to think you're going to win. After the bankruptcy, he had no such reason for self-deception. Could the trustee be fraudulent? I suppose it's theoretically possible, but I deem it very unlikely.

You can find images of Jobst bragging about the responses he got from chatGPT about the lawsuit, and saying Billy has no standing.

I guess we'll have to wait and see when Billy takes him to court again. I've seen a lot of divorces where one side tries to hide/obfuscate marital assets during/afterwards and judges tend to not take kindly to that. Like selling your assets greatly under market prices.

Billy cannot take him to court again over this, as I've gone over ITT. If there ever comes such a time, it will prove Karl a liar. We'll see.

Then you're stanning for a guy who is worth million and likely wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

I don't see how that's relevant.

I view the end result as justice -- mainly in how it negatively affects Billy Mitchell's financials. He will think twice before launching another frivolous lawsuit.

 

[NonPhixion]

I strongly suspect "I sold my property cheaply to my spouse AFTER a court judgment in a blatant plot to avoid consequences of the judgement" is something a judge would take exception to

Too bad he can't invent a Time Machine to sell them off before the award.

OP, this will likely end in tears for you.

If shit worked this way, nobody would be paying much in the way of divorce settlements.

I read that as his wife was co-owner of those properties and bought out his half, no? Seems legit to me.

 

[ecosse_011172]

Then you're stanning for a guy who is worth million and likely wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

I don't see how that's relevant.

Yes, that's the problem.

 

[MagusMajul]

Now we know why Billy has been pimping out his shitty sauce on his Twitter 'victory parade' -- he needs cash, NOW

I ordered like 10 bottles of his sauce it's great I doubt you ever even had it.

 

[E-Cat]

I read that as his wife was co-owner of those properties and bought out his half, no? Seems legit to me.

Correct. Same goes for the YT channel.

Yes, that's the problem.

Are you saying I want attention from him? Because I don't.

I ordered like 10 bottles of his sauce it's great I doubt you ever even had it.

Sure, I retract the word "shitty". I hope Billy doesn't sue me.

 

[diffusionx]

I read that as his wife was co-owner of those properties and bought out his half, no? Seems legit to me.

Timing matters here, when yopu do it after a major judgement and it clearly is an attempt to evade the judgement, then judges don't look kindly on that as it undermines the system.

 

[ecosse_011172]

Are you saying I want attention from him? Because I don't.

I'm saying your behaviour is like an obsessed fanboy of some dubious YouTuber, you seem a bit emotionally involved with someone who according to you, doesn't need all your cheerleading.

 

[Griffon]

Nice post Ms. Jobst.

Karl Jobst is a vicious belligerent dipshit, using his channel to go after other people and profit from it.

He lied about the lawsuit and about Billy to get sympathy from his followers. He gets none from me.

 

[Sticks]

 

[E-Cat]

I'm saying your behaviour is like an obsessed fanboy of some dubious YouTuber, you seem a bit emotionally involved with someone who according to you, doesn't need all your cheerleading.

I view the downfall of people like Billy Mitchell as just, and am expressing happiness about that. Read into that however you want. I'm not really that emotionally involved, the text format is deceptive in that way... I'm a generally non-emotive guy.

 

[digimaster7]

Losers Both of them

 

[Draugoth]

The only person more happy to this news other than Billy Mitchel is The Completionist

 

[E-Cat]

Karl Jobst is a vicious belligerent dipshit, using his channel to go after other people and profit from it.

Those people had it coming...

 

[ecosse_011172]

I view the downfall of people like Billy Mitchell as just, and am expressing happiness about that. Read into that however you want. I'm not really that emotionally involved, the text format is deceptive in that way... I'm a generally non-emotive guy.

Those people had it coming...

 

[Griffon]

Those people had it coming...

No they didn't.
Jobst has no right to do any of it. Calling them names and making shit up. Are you 12?

 

[E-Cat]

Implying that fraudulent people had an investigative journalist exposing them "coming for them" does not necessitate emotional involvement.

 

[ecosse_011172]

Implying that fraudulent people had an investigative journalist exposing them "coming for them" does not necessitate emotional involvement.

"Those people had it coming" is 100% emotional language.

 

[PeteBull]

Sorry OP, but even here on GAF aka hardcore gaming forum, no1 gives a F about those nobodies =D

 

[E-Cat]

"Those people had it coming" is 100% emotional language.

I suppose I am... happy about them being exposed. So, to that extent, I condede your point. Anyway, this is bordering on off-topic.

 

[Ozriel]

I view the end result as justice -- mainly in how it negatively affects Billy Mitchell's financials. He will think twice before launching another frivolous lawsuit.

Calling it 'frivolous' when you know the lawsuit was because he was accused of causing someone's suicide…and when you know he proved to the court that the defamatory claim cost him money?