tuna on toast
Banned
you better it by actively fighting back against bigotry, stupidity, and cruelty in various forms.
We have to actively fight against puns. Nothing destroys a thread like puns.
you better it by actively fighting back against bigotry, stupidity, and cruelty in various forms.
Are you guys okay with threads like these, though? I liked your example from before about the "Whats up with black people and wearing their pants on their knees? Don't they know how retarded they look?" thread. Would you want a rash of these popping up all the time? Would you want people to brush you off because they say you don't get the joke or are taking it too seriously? It's not about lacking a sense of humor, it's about seeing something that's pervasive in society that shouldn't be and trying to fight it as much as possible.
I think its more along the lines of like, GAF is a huge forum and people are gunna be dumb sometimes. And since a lot of posters on GAF are dudes, some of that dumbshit is gunna be dude-related dumbshit.
Are you guys okay with threads like these, though? I liked your example from before about the "Whats up with black people and wearing their pants on their knees? Don't they know how retarded they look?" thread. Would you want a rash of these popping up all the time? Would you want people to brush you off because they say you don't get the joke or are taking it too seriously? It's not about lacking a sense of humor, it's about seeing something that's pervasive in society that shouldn't be and trying to fight it as much as possible.
Are you guys okay with threads like these, though?
I liked your example from before about the "Whats up with black people and wearing their pants on their knees? Don't they know how retarded they look?" thread. Would you want a rash of these popping up all the time? Would you want people to brush you off because they say you don't get the joke or are taking it too seriously? It's not about lacking a sense of humor, it's about seeing something that's pervasive in society that shouldn't be and trying to fight it as much as possible.
Yeah, but I'm all for raising the standards around here. Dumbshit of any kind should not be tolerated.
I mean, no, of course not. But I don't think it's representative of male-gaf or anything. It's an attention whore trying to get attention by saying something insulting. Why feed into it?
No fun allowed?
No fun allowed?
If you consider lower posting standards "fun," then why did you choose NeoGAF? I ask that question honestly, not rhetorically. You have plenty of forum choices if you want low posting standards.
I like GAF for its high(er than most) maturity level, but I think a stupid, nonsense thread every now and again is fun.
I'm not saying the eyebrow thread was that, though.
isn't that the point in contention?
Yeah, you're right.
Shit like this is why I get tired with forums. Oh girls are so different guys, let's circle jerk about it. Then in other threads, why don't more women post? Wahhh. Jesus fuck. Ugh.
I mean, no, of course not. But I don't think it's representative of male-gaf or anything. It's an attention whore trying to get attention by saying something insulting. Why feed into it?
GAF has much higher posting standards than most other forums without even delving into the actual topics posted upon. Most people here use reasonably correct grammar and spelling, we have a TOS and a fairly restrictive membership policy (at least, we did), and we generally do justify our points in posts. My impression was that the topics we moderate here were largely due to advertising revenue; is that incorrect?If you consider lower posting standards "fun," then why did you choose NeoGAF? I ask that question honestly, not rhetorically. You have plenty of forum choices if you want low posting standards.
I mean, no, of course not. But I don't think it's representative of male-gaf or anything. It's an attention whore trying to get attention by saying something insulting. Why feed into it?
I dunno if you could say I'm "okay" with it. I don't have any strong feelings about it either way. I knew where it was going as soon as I saw it though. I usually just let people make their own mistakes. I don't take things here too seriously, if something does bother me I brush it off, ignore the thread, and move onto other things.
But I understand where you're coming from. I dunno if I'd say misogyny is rampant in GAF, but its there, and I could see how it'd be bothersome.
I mean, I guess, after giving it some more thought, you gals are perfectly in the right for being angry about this.
IDK, I'm just an easy going guy, shit doesn't really get to me so I just don't see why you'd get so worked up. Do something about it, sure, but don't let it ruin your day, or posting experience, or whatever.
Why are all these guys in Girl Gaf, let me say that again, Girl Gaf, telling Girls how to feel? A thread set up for girls to talk about what they want, and if that includes venting about whatever upsets her so be it.
Why are all these guys in Girl Gaf, let me say that again, Girl Gaf, telling Girls how to feel? A thread set up for girls to talk about what they want, and if that includes venting about whatever upsets her so be it.
GAF has much higher posting standards than most other forums without even delving into the actual topics posted upon. Most people here use reasonably correct grammar and spelling, we have a TOS and a fairly restrictive membership policy (at least, we did), and we generally do justify our points in posts. My impression was that the topics we moderate here were largely due to advertising revenue; is that incorrect?
Folks, the point is that stupid threads don't need to use sexism, etc as the means to that oh-so-hilarious end.
If you wouldn't say "why do gays...?" or "why do blacks...?" and follow that up with "they're retarded", then you probably shouldn't do that with women, either.
Food for thought.
Folks, the point is that stupid threads don't need to use sexism, etc as the means to that oh-so-hilarious end.
If you wouldn't say "why do gays...?" or "why do blacks...?" and follow that up with "they're retarded", then you probably shouldn't do that with women, either.
Food for thought.
What is the other side of the argument?
Why are all these guys in Girl Gaf, let me say that again, Girl Gaf, telling Girls how to feel? A thread set up for girls to talk about what they want, and if that includes venting about whatever upsets her so be it.
To be fair, though, the idea of tired, sex-based humor goes both ways. There's a clip of Louis CK on Opie and Anthony where they talk about the dumb in-joke shared among some women about how it's women who really run the show, and blah blah blah, and that type of humor is equally bad (though, admittedly, not equivalent in terms of its potential to create a sociocultural power imbalance).
The crux of Duki's argument was something amounting to, "Stop being offended by things."
So the posting standards we've created are not, primarily, about morality,but making sure that as many demographics as possible feel comfortable here, ultimately increasing growth and GAF's advertising revenue? That's fine, but I feel like this is a point that needs to be made more clear. You should (and probably do) also know that for a long time GAF's moderation was laxer in some respects, and that a lot of older members may need a fuller understanding of what is and is not allowable. While to you, what constitutes bigotry may be obvious, I imagine you will concede it is possible that for some people it is not.This is incorrect, yes. We already had harsh moderating standards before our conflicts with Google.
The purpose is to make GAF an enjoyable forum to read, even for those on the outside looking in. It also promotes long term growth. as a well kept forum is more likely to retain members than one that simply allows anyone to join and post whatever they want.
ahh that old chest nut.
You're talking about something that's completely irrelevant to what I'm talking about, which is NeoGAF posting etiquette.
It's on par with "bros before hos," "stop snitching," and "I'm telling my mom" in my book.
This is incorrect, yes. We already had harsh moderating standards before our conflicts with Google.
The purpose is to make GAF an enjoyable forum to read, even for those on the outside looking in. It also promotes long term growth. as a well kept forum is more likely to retain members than one that simply allows anyone to join and post whatever they want.
Well I must have wrongly assumed that, since everybody else in the discussion so far has understood that we're talking about NeoGAF posting etiquette, you would also know.
Now I know better.
Wait, are you talking to me? I said that I understood what you were talking about but was generalizing outward. From where do you get the idea that I didn't understand something? Yes, it was about NeoGAF posting etiquette, but the underlying issue was also the tendency for the internet to become a boys' club where sexist humor is used as a form of social currency. That's what I chose to comment upon because I didn't really have anything to say about GAF posting etiquette, since I always follow it and never troll.
What? When? Where?
I thought it was pretty clear throughout that Devo was attacking/mocking the subsequently-banned idiot OP and the thought process that goes into threads of that nature.
I'm not sure I follow. Where are you coming from and where are you going with this?Yesterday's Hagar the Horrible
http://www.arcamax.com/thefunnies/hagarthehorrible/s-1030298
Printed in 1,900 newspapers in 58 countries.
Yesterday's Hagar the Horrible
http://www.arcamax.com/thefunnies/hagarthehorrible/s-1030298
Printed in 1,900 newspapers in 58 countries.
So are we officially allowed to use smilies now? I remember that was a huge deal awhile back.
Yesterday's Hagar the Horrible
http://www.arcamax.com/thefunnies/hagarthehorrible/s-1030298
Printed in 1,900 newspapers in 58 countries.
no #shade tuna, but you're gonna have to come harder than that