Boss Doggie
all my loli wolf companions are so moe
on a related note, another thing this movie does well is that we see casualties
on a related note, another thing this movie does well is that we see casualties
I was impressed with how many wordless sequences this movie had. They used dialogue to fill in a few patches here and there but overall this was a very poetic and calm experience. I appreciated that so much. Rather than piling on context it just plays the whole thing completely straight. We know how its gonna play out. Its as predictable as a Hurricane. And then things play out in what is essentially real time! It was so much more immersive than a Pacifim Rim-type movie where you have to learn all this bullshit just to understand what is happening.
There were a few great moments of humor too. When Ford's child says "Mom, look at the tv!" And its the most aggro-shit you've ever seen on screen. That was just great especially since we had just been there and got pulled away before we got to see anything good.
The Godzilla 1954 original was kind of a mix between superstitious mythical sea monster and nuclear bombs creating the monster with all the radiation He left radiation where ever he left even in his foot prints. '54 was crazy in your face about nuclear war and how it shouldn't continue.
on a related note, another thing this movie does well is that we see casualties
I'd give the movie serious demerits if it weren't so brilliantly directed, and if this aspect weren't characteristic of giant monster films as a whole, and if the filmmakers didn't go out of their way to make the humans' marginal status part of the movie's world view, which is something along the lines of: We're guests here, and we can be snuffed out or kicked out at any moment. Unlike "Star Trek Into Darkness," "Man of Steel" and other recent blockbusters, this one's aware of the devastation and death that would occur if its scenarios were real. Lots of people die in this movie, onscreen, screaming.
Yup. A review said it well:
What a disappointment. Has everything in place to he great. Respect the tone they went with but when you go that route I have to care about the characters. I was rolling my eyes in every scene involving the leads. It just did nothing for me for half of the film.
This movie may have some of the best monster audio I have ever heard. The bass and nuances in the sound stage were impeccable. The scene whereReally sold the size of the creaturesthey're hiding from MAMA MUTO on the bridge and you hear her click and grumble shook the entire cinema and it was awesome.
So I noticed (easter egg). Did anyone else catch this or other throwback easter eggs?when the father and son returned to their old house in the q zone there was an old insect tank with the word 'Mothra' on it as the camera slow panned.
As many have already mentioned, the characters are written in extremely broad strokes. Even Cranston, who is given the most "complex" motivations, is very simple. They could have EASILY reduced the cast by 2-3 characters (let's nix the wife and kid, if not Ford, and combine Watanabe and Hawkins into one character) and the story would have been improved and more focused. The wife and kid literally existed to just give a different POV for SOME events and to provide Ford with motivation.
Speaking of, what was Ford's motivation? To get back to his wife and kid? So lame. Cranston's character was at least trying to make sense of a tragedy and find the truth, but I guess he wouldn't have been able to be involved in so many cool setpieces.
So I noticed (easter egg). Did anyone else catch this or other throwback easter eggs?when the father and son returned to their old house in the q zone there was an old insect tank with the word 'Mothra' on it as the camera slow panned.
Ok I am interested in seeing the movie since I love these kinda movies. I even enjoyed the 98 Godzilla. So how does it compare to something like pacific rim? Since that was the grandiose kaiju film of recent times.
Ok I am interested in seeing the movie since I love these kinda movies. I even enjoyed the 98 Godzilla. So how does it compare to something like pacific rim? Since that was the grandiose kaiju film of recent times.
So I noticed (easter egg). Did anyone else catch this or other throwback easter eggs?when the father and son returned to their old house in the q zone there was an old insect tank with the word 'Mothra' on it as the camera slow panned.
WorthPlaying said:The new film starts out promising enough, with a mysterious carcass discovered in a mine, an empty egg and an entire nuclear power plant wiped out within the first half-hour. Mix in some human drama courtesy of Bryan Cranston, and things are looking good.
Cranston plays the role of Joe Brody, a nuclear engineer at the Janjira power plant. Joe's been tracking some mysterious tremors that were threatening the plant. He's safety-conscious and wants to shut things down, but his bosses won't let him. Disaster strikes, and Joe spends the next 15 years brooding. He's out of work, disgraced and convinced that there was a cover-up, but he has no way to prove it.
WorthPlaying said:Ultimately, it is that sense of power and majesty that is missing from "Godzilla." Despite having the right look, even Godzilla suffers from the same sort of randomness that plagues the human characters. There are times when the film treats him as a force of nature, something that cannot be controlled. Other times, he is a force for good. Other times, he is just a predator hunting for his next meal. Still other times, he is a benevolent protector of the main character. If these changes occurred across a series of films, it might work, but to have them all rush out over the course of an hour makes it feel as though the writers were just doing whatever was convenient at the time.
Ok I am interested in seeing the movie since I love these kinda movies. I even enjoyed the 98 Godzilla. So how does it compare to something like pacific rim? Since that was the grandiose kaiju film of recent times.
Ultimately, it is that sense of power and majesty that is missing from "Godzilla." Despite having the right look, even Godzilla suffers from the same sort of randomness that plagues the human characters. There are times when the film treats him as a force of nature, something that cannot be controlled. Other times, he is a force for good. Other times, he is just a predator hunting for his next meal. Still other times, he is a benevolent protector of the main character. If these changes occurred across a series of films, it might work, but to have them all rush out over the course of an hour makes it feel as though the writers were just doing whatever was convenient at the time.
Ok I am interested in seeing the movie since I love these kinda movies. I even enjoyed the 98 Godzilla. So how does it compare to something like pacific rim? Since that was the grandiose kaiju film of recent times.
Pacific Rim is the better film.
2014 Godzilla had the potential to be amazing (see the aforementioned trailer), but it fails in execution.
Haters gonna hate
Lovers gonna love
I don't even want
None of the above
I want to piss on you
Honestly I say Pacific Rim and Godzilla are about on par with each other. It comes down to if you prefer your movies slow burned or more faster paced.
I do think Godzilla has more potential to improve in a sequel if they hire a better writer.
Haven't seen the movie yet but assuming that's a good read on the theme, doesn't sound dumb to me. In a climate-change world, we need to understand that nature is pretty unstoppably powerful and it will course correct with or without us. Just depends on what side of the course correction we want to be on.So I was trying to think what was the moral / theme of this movie. "Nature is unstoppably powerful and it doesn't care about what humans are doing" is a pretty dumb message in a climate-change world.
I really hope Guillermo del Toro watches this movie.
They don't call him Big G for nothin.The message of the movie is "Don't fuck with Godzilla".
Of course he will, he is a monster movie nut!
I keep seeing this film being compared to Jaws, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Jurassic Park, but the Rotten meter is falling fast. Is the film actually good, or are film critics up their own ass?
I keep seeing this film being compared to Jaws, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Jurassic Park, but the Rotten meter is falling fast. Is the film actually good, or are film critics up their own ass?
I keep seeing this film being compared to Jaws, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Jurassic Park, but the Rotten meter is falling fast. Is the film actually good, or are film critics up their own ass?