What Mothra easter egg?
During the scene when Ford and his Dad are searching for his disks in their old home the screen pans over an old insect tank with a name tag on it that said "Mothra".
What Mothra easter egg?
My thoughts on the ending.LOL.Godzilla! Savior of our city! ...while he steps on, crushes and kills another hundred people while walking back into the ocean.
The only thing that would have really allowed them to make it better is if every damn movie wasnt force fit into a PG13 Rating.
That being said I got way more out of it than I was expecting and the amount of fighting was just right.
The fighting can get a bit long in the tooth like Pac Rim did but they kept it to the point.
After watching a bunch of the classic movies leading up to this I feel they really paid homage to the old ones well.
I have no commitment to Godzilla being male or female one way or the other. I'm just trying to see your point. As I see it, no one including the Japanese filmmakers have ever referred to Godzilla as a female. But you are insisting on "She" despite the quotes you provide clearly referring to Godzilla as "He". So, it's just a bit of odd evidence to try and make a point with. If there is some significance to Godzilla's gender I'd be interested in seeing it. But to be clear, right now you haven't done anything to prove that Godzilla is female.
the fact that people are complaining this movie didnt have enough action is a testament to how bloated hollywood action movies have gradually become
There is a question mark there, and I think that was largely to be funny and a nice nod to long time Godzilla fans, not exactly the major point of the movie. But for some spoilery discussionMore importantly, I think the movie offers up several interpretations Godzilla's role, some more accurate than others.Godzilla did just kill two monsters that were terrorizing humanity, and he did so without purposefully killing anyone, so by comparison he is pretty much a savior.
I feel like people complaining about Godzilla. Are missing the fact thatnot killing people/terrorizing a citywhy would Godzilla care about us? We're literally ants compared to this iteration of Godzilla, completely unable to threaten it. Most things avoid ants, they don't go out of their way to kill them. Godzilla just up and left when the MUTOs were dead because what the hell else was there for it to do? Why would it bother to stick around and mess with things so low on the food chain compared to it?
I thought the movie was an incredible amount of fun. Goddamn lost it whenGodzilla effectively mic-dropped the female MUTOs head after that execution. She was done with that shit and needed a nap.
It felt like it could be in the heisei Godzilla series
I thought this was actually more of a Showa movie myself. This Godzilla wasn't the gritty evil bastard he was in Heisei.
Even if you hated this, that is just flat out wrong. 98 had sooooo many more issues with it.lol this was the worst movie I have seen since Godzilla 98.
Hilariously terrible.
I agree mostly but I can't blame the actors. I think that while they wanted to tease Godzilla they were killing tension with a lot of the scenes in between. They gave Ken Watanabe almost nothing to do but stare into the screen. The military general or whoever is emotionless, just walking around telling his troops what the deal is. Little urgency in a lot of the military scenes. Even when Watanabe is telling the general he's a retard to try and nuke the monsters they just sort of politely disagree. Watanabe should have been going nuts like Cranston was, or they should have just ditched the monster duo experts and have Cranston fill that role. Then the monsters are fighting in the city and it looks like it's just a really busy day in the hospital. People watching the fight on tv as if it's the ellen show. There's a lot of stuff in there like that which is small but can take me out of the scene. They're coming to San Francisco in this flotilla of ships with Godzilla and the ships are so close they're almost on top of him. Maybe keep your distance cause he's a giant wild animal? I know it sounds like a nitpick but if you want the audience to be fearful it would make sense for the actors to be too.I think the lack of action isn't necessarily the main problem, it's just that a lot of the moments between the action set pieces weren't very compelling mostly due to Johnson's character being pretty flat. The more I think about it, the more I appreciate the meticulous pacing of the movie as it was an interesting directional choice but the human moments were arguably the weakest aspect of the film.
Sure nearly every Godzilla film before has had terrible human moments but the moments where Cranston was featured gave a lot of people some hope and as a result it kinda set a bar that every other actor unfortunately could not surpass.
tii.the fact that people are complaining this movie didnt have enough action is a testament to how bloated hollywood action movies have gradually become
All the public knows is three monsters trashed the city fighting each other and killed thousands. Nobody knew about Godzilla's motives other than the military. Logically speaking it makes no sense that the one surviving monster in the brawl is randomly labeled and treated as a "hero" by the public, but the movie just went running with that for no real reason.
I agree mostly but I can't blame the actors. I think that while they wanted to tease Godzilla they were killing tension with a lot of the scenes in between. They gave Ken Watanabe almost nothing to do but stare into the screen. The military general or whoever is emotionless, just walking around telling his troops what the deal is. Little urgency in a lot of the military scenes. Even when Watanabe is telling the general he's a retard to try and nuke the monsters they just sort of politely disagree. Watanabe should have been going nuts like Cranston was, or they should have just ditched the monster duo experts and have Cranston fill that role. Then the monsters are fighting in the city and it looks like it's just a really busy day in the hospital. People watching the fight on tv as if it's the ellen show. There's a lot of stuff in there like that which is small but can take me out of the scene. They're coming to San Francisco in this flotilla of ships with Godzilla and the ships are so close they're almost on top of him. Maybe keep your distance cause he's a giant wild animal? I know it sounds like a nitpick but if you want the audience to be fearful it would make sense for the actors to be too.
Anyway I enjoyed it but I thought it could be a lot better.
Here's a questionHow did the audience at your theater react to the tv headline at the end? In my theater people laughed, but no one seemed to walk away from the movie with that as the main take away. And from the perspective of the general public in the movie, 2 monsters destroyed 2 cities. Then Godzilla showed up and killed both of them. The Las Vegas was destroyed by one Muto. San Fran was already being destroyed by the other Muto before Godzilla came. Once Godzilla got there he promptly killed both monsters then left. So, even though the headline was only played for laughs, it also does make sense. And let's not forget the question mark.
Because some people like it?How this movie is getting decent reviews is utterly beyond me. Biggest trainwreck I've seen on screen in a long time.
Why is there a need to prove that Godzilla is female, but no need to prove that it is male? Is there any anatomic hint I overlooked? Having a baby, laying eggs.. Japan refers to it mostly as it, west as him ... except:
The female characters in Godzilla all play supporting roles, why is that? Is it a commercial decision?
Edwards: Godzilla is actually female! We would have changed it to queen of the monsters but it didnt have the same ring to it. In the early drafts of the script we did have a female lead but we ended up with a male. There are so many great examples of female heroes in action films, Alien is my personal favourite.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jceKxuDbq4&sns=em
Therefore, a logical conclusion would be female or invertebrate. Or, the most logical conclusion, noone bothered to write Godzilla properly as creature and therefore, anything goes.
How this movie is getting decent reviews is utterly beyond me. Biggest trainwreck I've seen on screen in a long time.
Holy shit I've never seen so many coincidences/chance encounters/deus ex's in one film. The writers handled the human part of the story terribly.
I'm pretty sure '98 said that Godzilla was able to reproduce asexually.
Because some people like it?
I think that is what was most disappointing to me. Otherwise, I enjoyed it.Walter White is barely in this.
The slow burn structure style is pretty unusual.
98' isn't cannon
It's canon, it's just not Godzilla. They reference itin GMK.make fun of it
My theater was lame. They didn't react to shit through the whole movie. Even in the first reveal with the first Godzilla roar I wanted to jump out of my seat with my fists punching the air, but the theater was dead silent.
But to answer the question, I thinkthe headline itself was just part of the movie as a whole portraying him as a hero. They went through extensive exposition explaining why he exists, solely to kill the other monsters. The first Muto is the first monster we as an audience see, and it attacks and kills people, including Cranston. The first Muto basically takes the role of the first impression of a giant monster wrecking shit, Godzilla comes up and is exclusively preoccupied with taking them down. I mean to say, the storytelling very obviously portrays the Mutos as the bad guys and Godzilla as the good guy. He awakes at the first sign of a threat with the Muto and goes directly to kill them. The killing of the second Muto shouldn't have been a "triumphant", "we won!" moment with inspiring music, it should've been terrifying and badass. Then they top it off with the headline. So even if I were to rationalize that it was a minor joke or homage, the rest of the movie tried too hard to portray him as a hero for me to consider than it really was just a joke or an homage.
Ford went to Hawaii because he was heading back to California and that's the way you get to California from Japan.
I see where you are coming from. I think there are two different things to consider. One is how the movie wants us, the real audience, to see Godzilla. Two is how the people in the movie might come to view Godzilla based on what happens in the film.
I think the audience is definitely intended to view Godzilla as a hero. This is good Godzilla, not terrorizing humanity Godzilla. If that's an issue for you then that's fine but I was happy with this take.
Within the film Godzilla isn't necessarily the hero, he is an alpha-predator and he is only interested in taking down other predators who can rival him. The Muto are his rivals. I don't think he cares to save humanity, he just isn't bothered by us. We are ants to him. There are a few places where this is a little jarring, such as when the navy ships sail around him, or when the military shoots him and he doesn't seem to hit back too much. But other than that I thought his behavior is consistent for me. Godzilla awakened to the mating call of the Muto. He wants to stop their mating/off-spring because more Mutos would have been a greater threat to his dominance.
Movie sucked!!!
One part that made me laugh was when Watanabe talked about his father's watch which stopped during hiroshima.
The movie takes place in present day - 2014 or 2015 given the timeline.
So you're telling me, Watanabe is supposed to be 70years old at least? Seriously? We're supposed to buy that?
Movie sucked!!!
One part that made me laugh was when Watanabe talked about his father's watch which stopped during hiroshima.
The movie takes place in present day - 2014 or 2015 given the timeline.
So you're telling me, Watanabe is supposed to be 70years old at least? Seriously? We're supposed to buy that?