Got an F on a college essay for swearing?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't believe using swear words in an essay, even if apparently not ok, makes me an asshole, nor do I find how that has to do with anything.


Basically how I feel heh.


Really? Unfiltered as I write how I articulate things in my mind, not that garbage.

Writing is more than an art: it is a form of communication. It is your responsibility to do the heavy lifting in making your ideas both appealing and understandable to your audience.
 
A lot of high schools don't teach students how to write at all. I know mine didn't.

I remember my first college-level English course and my professor told us to forget literally everything we were ever taught in high school about English because it was bad and wrong, lol.
 
I cared enough to watch a 45 minute film in full, spend an hour and a half composing it and bothered to try.

And yeah, I'd love to. I probably don't give a shit about the course, but I was passionate about what I wrote in the moment. That's what I really need, to be passionate. If I'm not, then I'm going nowhere. Regardless of how shit the essay actually is, I still feel accomplished.

Good lord....

No you need to be good.... Passionate can be, and is part of good, but passionate garbage is still garbage.... Getting an F isn't go anywhere either.

You shouldn't feel accomplished by an F... what did you accomplish?

Already stated but over two hours of work went into it. It wasn't a rush job, just poor writing and timing.

2 hours on an essay is absolutely a rush job.
 
I cared enough to watch a 45 minute film in full, spend an hour and a half composing it and bothered to try.

And yeah, I'd love to. I probably don't give a shit about the course, but I was passionate about what I wrote in the moment. That's what I really need, to be passionate. If I'm not, then I'm going nowhere. Regardless of how shit the essay actually is, I still feel accomplished.

Wow such dedication
 
I cared enough to watch a 45 minute film in full, spend an hour and a half composing it and bothered to try.

And yeah, I'd love to. I probably don't give a shit about the course, but I was passionate about what I wrote in the moment. That's what I really need, to be passionate. If I'm not, then I'm going nowhere.

You can't always be passionate about everything. That is not sustainable.

Regardless of how shit the essay actually is, I still feel accomplished.

It honestly feels like you aren't learning anything at all. Why do you feel accomplished. I'm not trying to be mean, but you wrote a bad essay using a mindset that will lead to you continuing to write bad essays. That's whatever if you're okay with making bad grades, but why would you feel accomplished about it?

I remember my first college-level English course and my professor told us to forget literally everything we were ever taught in high school about English because it was bad and wrong, lol.

High school English classes are generally geared towards teaching students to write in a way that will get them into college. It's not so much wrong as something you need to move past.
 
I cared enough to watch a 45 minute film in full, spend an hour and a half composing it and bothered to try.

And yeah, I'd love to. I probably don't give a shit about the course, but I was passionate about what I wrote in the moment. That's what I really need, to be passionate. If I'm not, then I'm going nowhere. Regardless of how shit the essay actually is, I still feel accomplished.

You really ask your teacher if you can resubmit the paper or something.
 
I cared enough to watch a 45 minute film in full, spend an hour and a half composing it and bothered to try.

And yeah, I'd love to. I probably don't give a shit about the course, but I was passionate about what I wrote in the moment. That's what I really need, to be passionate. If I'm not, then I'm going nowhere. Regardless of how shit the essay actually is, I still feel accomplished.

With this approach in academia, I'd say you need a couple of more reality checks. I'm utterly amazed at the lack of introspection and awareness among today's youths, good lord. Ah well, any approach to not completely demotivate you and crush your spirits, I guess.
 
Already stated but over two hours of work went into it. It wasn't a rush job, just poor writing and timing.

Two hours spent on an essay in college is way under the amount you should be spending on it. That shit may have been okay in highschool but university expects way more out of students especially where writing is concerned.
 
I feel like you've been plenty mauled by this point OP (seriously, you guys in this thread, geez) and can hopefully learn a whole bunch of lessons from this experience.

You feel bad now, but you know more than you did before.
 
Not to be an ass, but we've now gone from CENSORSHIP to ARTISTIC EXPRESSION to suicide/depression to drunkenness to "I only spent two hours on it" on why this essay is as bad as it is.

Not to bring up this thread, but I feel like the genuine answer to a lot of things is just "scapegoating."
 
I cared enough to watch a 45 minute film in full, spend an hour and a half composing it and bothered to try.

And yeah, I'd love to. I probably don't give a shit about the course, but I was passionate about what I wrote in the moment. That's what I really need, to be passionate. If I'm not, then I'm going nowhere. Regardless of how shit the essay actually is, I still feel accomplished.

Again I’ll use music as an example because the thread is moving fast.

I’m learning to play guitar and music theory along with it. If I were to compose a solo to a backing track, it could certainly be passionate but it would still have to follow the rules of music theory.

If the backing track I have to use is in Am/C and I compose a solo in Dm, it will sound terrible. I could be as skilled as Steve Vi in my speed and techniques, and as passionate too, but that doesn’t change that it wouldn’t mesh and sound out of tune (because it is).

Being passionate about something is great! But expression comes from how you handle the realities of the limitations set in your chosen medium.
 
I feel like you've been plenty mauled by this point OP (seriously, you guys in this thread, geez) and can hopefully learn a whole bunch of lessons from this experience.

You feel bad now, but you know more than you did before.

Have you read his subsequent posts? I don't really get the feeling he takes this ordeal to heart. 2 hours in total for a paper? lol
 
I feel like you've been plenty mauled by this point OP (seriously, you guys in this thread, geez) and can hopefully learn a whole bunch of lessons from this experience.

You feel bad now, but you know more than you did before.

He's getting mauled because he is proud of his F
 
Not to be an ass, but we've now gone from CENSORSHIP to ARTISTIC EXPRESSION to suicide/depression to drunkenness to "I only spent two hours on it" on why this essay is as bad as it is.

Not to bring up this thread, but I feel like the genuine answer to a lot of things is just "scapegoating."

It's an emotional rollercoaster is what it is.
 
Time for a confession.

I was drunk when I wrote that essay.

But, I still feel like swearing can be used effectively, but apparently not. Maybe I take Fish (Marillion) and Patti Smith too seriously. But that might explain why I got chewed out that badly. Quite honestly reading it again, it's more like a C, at best. I just wrote what came to my head and... well, that's good but not when you don't even bother reading your work before submitting it.

Oh and I got Evilore to reply to one of my threads. That's another first.

Whether your drunk excuse is true or not (I feel it is used too often to be true in so many cases), it certainly doesn't make you look any better. If anything, it's questionable as to why you thought submitting an essay written in a drunken state was a good idea. Even more questionable as to why you then decided to start questioning the grade you got afterwards.

OP, you are, as you have self proclaimed, a mess. One who needs to use his noggin more often. Now is not the time to try defending yourself. You lost that battle the moment you posted this thread. Now is the time to take your L and learn from this.
 
Like, I'm trying to imagine how the words fuck and shit would even end up in an academic paper unless they were direct quotes. The purpose of an essay is to persuade and if you can't "make your feelings clear" in written format with all the prep time in the world, then you're not very fucking good at it.
 
I'm not a fan of this line of thinking. It's fine without context, but it's used by both scientists and laymen alike to berate the Humanities, Humanistic Social Sciences, and, to a lesser extent, the other Social Sciences. It's often coupled with not actually looking into what the "fluff" is actually saying. Obviously I'm talking about at the post-graduate level, but I find that people's understanding of a discipline often comes from their experiences with their core class on the topic in college.

You're right that people will often casually dismiss writing or argumentation because it doesn't conform to the sensibilities of their discipline. But when it comes to self-editing, I think it's often hard to differentiate style from extravagance, especially in undergrad, but if you've identified what you think is necessary in your work, then you're already approaching some justification for your style or argument whatever it is. 'Necessity' isn't going to be the same across the disciplines, but philosophical writing is pretty good at emphasizing it in general.
 
Whether your drunk excuse is true or not, it certainly doesn't make you look any better. If anything, it's questionable as to why you thought submitting an essay written in a drunken state was a good idea. Even more questionable as to why you then decided to start questioning the grade you got afterwards.

OP, you are, as you have self proclaimed, a mess. One who needs to use his noggin more often.
It's not for defending myself or anything really. It's giving the facts as the why I'm realizing this essay probably was poor and it took about 100 people telling me that to realize it - I'm too proud and I'm admitting to that, when I posted the topic I was mad, now I have more insight.
 
A lot of high schools don't teach students how to write at all. I know mine didn't.

Maybe I got lucky with my high school. I never considered myself a good writer until I got to college and saw how other students wrote. For some reason I find it hard to articulate my thoughts on forums, though. I've been a junior member for years. I'm a lurker.
 
I just hope you didn't take a class room spot from someone who would give a shit and want to be there.
Yeah, you seem like a wonderful man. Piss off, I'm getting through life day by day. If you could articulate the least bit you'd know I'd already realized the essay is shit.

That's it people, I'm done with the thread. I've gotten everything I've needed out of it and then some. Remind me to not post confessionals on neogaf anymore too... or that might be a good thing.
 
Already stated but over two hours of work went into it. It wasn't a rush job, just poor writing and timing.

Two hours would be a rush job even for a competent writer, and you literally just admitted to being drunk while writing it. And you didn't even bother re-reading it before submission.

I thought this thread had been savage enough to get through to you, but apparently not. You fucked up on multiple fronts here, and will keep failing unless you change your attitude and approach.
 
Yeah, you seem like a wonderful man. Piss off, I'm getting through life day by day. If you could articulate the least bit you'd know I'd already realized the essay is shit.

That's it people, I'm done with the thread. I've gotten everything I've needed out of it and then some. Remind me to not post confessionals on neogaf anymore too... or that might be a good thing.

*Woman

Almost everyone is getting through life day to day.



You:

a) Wrote the essay drunk
b) spent only 90 minutes on it
c) Littered it with profanity
d) Admitted you probably don't care about the course
e) Tried to claim your artistic voice was being censored by your instructor
e) Felt accomplished even though you got a freaking F

Yet I'm a jerk because I said I hoped you weren't denying someone who wanted to be in the class a spot.
 
Reading the other bits of information make me believe you deserve that F because it comes across to me that you didn't take this assignment seriously enough. Writing it while inebriated and only working on it for two hours isn't something someone who really wanted a good grade would do.

You need to do better.
 
That's it people, I'm done with the thread. I've gotten everything I've needed out of it and then some. Remind me to not post confessionals on neogaf anymore too... or that might be a good thing.

You didn't get the reinforcement you were looking for and have so far ignored your wake up call.

Grow up.
 

image.php
 
I'm not a fan of this line of thinking. It's fine without context, but it's used by both scientists and laymen alike to berate the Humanities, Humanistic Social Sciences, and, to a lesser extent, the other Social Sciences. It's often coupled with not actually looking into what the "fluff" is actually saying. Obviously I'm talking about at the post-graduate level, but I find that people's understanding of a discipline often comes from their experiences with their core class on the topic in college.

I'm also a rapid anti-prescriptivist, much more than I am actively a descriptivist, so I also don't mark off for grammar and the like unless I actually can't parse the paper. So I tell my students that they can be kind of loose with me, but also warn them that they can't take that for granted with their other classes.

I think it's silly that we act like most undergraduate papers are actually just shittier versions of actual research. We need to accept that they serve a different purpose. Part of that is not caring so much about tone and the like.

I apologize if my comments gave the impression that I am criticizing the level of academic rigor in those fields. I, too, get frustrated with the uncritical (and frankly, usually ignorant) blanket dismissal of certain academic disciplines by people in STEM fields. What I was calling "fluff" in that example isn't the literary analysis itself, but more stylistic things like having long introductions and conclusions in a short essay, making overly broad statements/platitudes, tautological statements, etc.

As for being anti-prescriptivist, I am also of the mind that my grading rubrics should revolve primarily around content. The issue I have with just grading on the content is that this excuses a lot of bad writing in a field that is already replete with bad writing. I find a lot of people in STEM don't 1) get enough practice writing and 2) get feedback on what constitutes good and clear writing. The fact that style is rarely emphasized in technical fields is why so much of what is out there is hard to parse and filled with unnecessary jargon.
 
No doubt. But I think he got the message after the 4th page.

Considering after the 4th page his reasons/excuses for the poor essay continued to change... I don't know.

Yeah, you seem like a wonderful man. Piss off, I'm getting through life day by day. If you could articulate the least bit you'd know I'd already realized the essay is shit.

That's it people, I'm done with the thread. I've gotten everything I've needed out of it and then some. Remind me to not post confessionals on neogaf anymore too... or that might be a good thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAYL5H46QnQ
 
Yeah, you seem like a wonderful man. Piss off, I'm getting through life day by day. If you could articulate the least bit you'd know I'd already realized the essay is shit.

That's it people, I'm done with the thread. I've gotten everything I've needed out of it and then some. Remind me to not post confessionals on neogaf anymore too... or that might be a good thing.

PLTZJRh.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom