eot
Banned
Most historians of science go further. Scientists are able to get their point across to other scientists, almost never to lay people, because they have an extremely specific methodology and language along with a specific culture in which a number of language moves are understood as meaningful and permissible without actually saying much to anyone that isn't of that culture. It's not just jargon either, but a fundamental insular communication. There aren't that many problems with that in the abstract, but it practice it's made understanding what scientists do very difficult for others and essentially impossible for scientists.
Communicating science to people within your field is a fundamentally different problem than communicating it to laypeople. The latter is akin to telling a captivating story, that might bear little resemblance to the truth, while the former is about being as unambiguous and accurate as possible, while still being succinct. There is a middle ground between the two, communicating to other scientists who are not within your field.
Most science isn't going to be interesting to laypeople, and a tiny, tiny fraction of all science will get the majority of public interest. I have a friends who work on things that is fascinating on a conceptual level, and communicating with the public is much easier for them than for most scientists. They don't have to do much work to make people interested. It's the reason why you can find thousands of videos on relativity on youtube, but not that many on Noether's theorem (maybe not the best example because there are videos on that as well of course, but it's still disproportional).