I am surprised at the lack of any kind of mention for Forza and Starfield. At least the PC versions which look absolutely stunning at times. I dont know how they included Robocop and FF16, both of which looks stunning at times and extremely mediocre other times, but dont do the same for Forza and Starfield.
They have gone absolutely mad. Super Mario Odyssey and Hifi Rush over Forza, Hogwarts, Atomic Heart, Dead Island 2, mortal kombat 1, and Starfield? Madness.
- 1 CP 2077 + PL- no contest for me, they even mention that one reason is DF political, as they already gave it first place, which is BS, and another reason that apparently is valid only for CP.
- 2 Avatar
- 3 Alan Wake 2
- 4 Horizon FW: BS
- 5 Final Fantasy XVI
What do you mean? I cant tell if you are angry at DF for giving it third place or angry that it shouldnt count since it was already given first place a few years ago?
I dont know why Cyberpunk is included in this. its DLC. The city is largely the same. The new area is barely any different let alone comparable to full fledged games. If we are to include Cyberpunk, then we should include Horizon burning shores, callisto protocol, GOW Ragnorak and other games that had DLCs released this year. Especially considering they picked fucking Super Mario Odyssey and Hifi Rush over these games.
Having a new lighting engine like Path Tracing is like putting lipstick on a pig. The game still has those last gen assets, last gen animations, and all the other flaws that Matrix has since fixed. had they remade the whole game like RE4, Demon Souls, and SoTC then id understand. Updating the lighting to path tracing simply shouldnt be enough to warrant anything more than an honorable mention when so many games this year went and did far more things graphically from scratch. Might as well include Witcher 3's RT patch in the top 3. I think it released this year as well.
If Nixxes manages to add RTGI to Horizon FW next year on PC, should they include it in the top 3? Eh.