• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Greece votes OXI/No on more Austerity measures

Status
Not open for further replies.
They also need long-term graphs that look like this:
cCA4E7Q.jpg


Look how tiny it makes the current debt seem.

Yeah, that's late capitalism according to Marx. Maybe socialism will start before the end of the century after all.
 
"@GreekAnalyst 16s16 seconds ago

.@AAthanasopoulos confirms that there was no Greek proposal at the #Eurogroup"

So that deal within 48 hours? Unsurprising that they continue to play games. Not as if their banks are on the verge of collapse or anything.
 
I mean, yeah, why not break it off now?

Indeed, which is why Yanis initial line of thinking was that they should either truly get together and bro it out for greater utopic USE stuff, or just break it off.

"@GreekAnalyst 16s16 seconds ago

.@AAthanasopoulos confirms that there was no Greek proposal at the #Eurogroup"

So that deal within 48 hours? Unsurprising that they continue to play games. Not as if their banks are on the verge of collapse or anything.


Wait what? Didn't we get reports that were in line with "meet new greek proposal, same as old greek proposal'? Ffs i hate twitter news.
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
"@GreekAnalyst 16s16 seconds ago

.@AAthanasopoulos confirms that there was no Greek proposal at the #Eurogroup"

So that deal within 48 hours? Unsurprising that they continue to play games. Not as if their banks are on the verge of collapse or anything.

It's ok, Greece is going to print drachmas, so everyone wins!
 

Xando

Member
"@GreekAnalyst 16s16 seconds ago

.@AAthanasopoulos confirms that there was no Greek proposal at the #Eurogroup"

So that deal within 48 hours? Unsurprising that they continue to play games. Not as if their banks are on the verge of collapse or anything.
Tsipras has to be trolling and secretly printing drachma at this point.
 

norinrad

Member
"@GreekAnalyst 16s16 seconds ago

.@AAthanasopoulos confirms that there was no Greek proposal at the #Eurogroup"

So that deal within 48 hours? Unsurprising that they continue to play games. Not as if their banks are on the verge of collapse or anything.

I thought they were open for a new Greek proposal?
 

tokkun

Member
Maybe they could have yields that look like this

Or economic performance like this if they took inspiration from the US on how things are done. And I mean the US hasn't been smart, but they're not as dumb as the troika.

ij-u98AMYAuSaZ_v6sUg1cAEx-oyRj2X9uDagEvm12S069Y3QAM43VIN-RhNf0aZ0xh2W6gxnTuzlFwC6qaixIKbHW_tcvp3qeuyfk6PzSEfZcMT9c6eFy4fZu99zPoIlQ

Even the Greeks have argued that their peak was unsustainable because it was fueled by borrowing that outpaced improvements in productivity. If that's the case, then comparing GDP to the peak during the bubble days is not exactly a good measure of health.
 
Indeed, which is why Yanis initial line of thinking was that they should either truly get together and bro it out for greater utopic USE stuff, or just break it off.




Wait what? Didn't we get reports that were in line with "meet new greek proposal, same as old greek proposal'? Ffs i hate twitter news.

That would have been at least something to discuss today. It's in the best interest of all partys to get this solved asap.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
Interesting read on the position of the more poorer states in the Eurozone.

http://www.politico.eu/article/berl...ck-for-greece-grexit-default-debt-referendum/

That's a fake issue. Estonia or Slovakia don't have to help Greece. Actually nobody should help Greece with money from now on. But ironically this is exactly what EU and IMF want now, to continue to give money to Greece (under the austerity agreement). So again instead of focusing on the economical solution we get political statements.
 
Greek Prez to Tusk: Plz understand

July 7, 2015

Dear Mr. President,

I would like to inform you that following a request by the Prime Minister of Greece Mr. Alexis Tsipras, I called a meeting yesterday of the political leaders of the Parties of the Greek Parliament, in which a common declaration was adopted by all Parties except the Communist Party of Greece stating the following:

The recent vote of the Greek people in the referendum does not constitute a mandate to break away from the Euro zone, but a mandate to continue and strengthen the effort for attaining a socially just and economically viable agreement. The Government will assume the responsibility of continuing negotiations, and every political leader will contribute to this effort on the basis of their institutional and political role.

The common goal, in this context, is the pursuit of a solution that will ensure:

- Covering, sufficiently, the financial needs of the country

- Credible reforms, based on a fair distribution of burdens and the promotion of growth, with as few recessionary consequences as possible

- A strong, front-loaded developmental program, primarily oriented to confronting unemployment and encouraging entrepreneurship

- A commitment to beginning a substantial discussion on confronting the problem of the viability of Greek public debt

The Political Leaders also underlined that the restoration of liquidity in the Greek banking system, in coordination with the ECB, constitutes an immediate priority.

The aforementioned consensual decision of most Greek Parliamentary parties constitutes a crucial opportunity for all euro zone partners to reach an economically and politically viable agreement.

I remain,

Sincerely yours

Prokopis Pavlopoulos
--

And guardian on multiple sources confirming no new proposals today.

i don't even know how to interpret that.
 

Wiktor

Member
Yes, because people want to keep living in worse standards just for kicks.

It's pretty hard to expect countries who keep living in those worse standards to fund greeks's living better than they do. In reality those poorer countries won't have to do much, but after this referendum Greece lost most of their widespread support among other countries. Logic has left the building long ago.
 

EloKa

Member
Greek Prez to Tsipras: Plz understand


--

And guardian on multiple sources confirming no new proposals today.

i don't even know how to interpret that.

Who is he writing to? Afaik Prokopis Pavlopoulos is the Greeks President.
Is the letter for the "dear ECB president" ?
 

Peyotl

Neo Member
There'd need to be some form of minimum income, but there's lots of support around the political spectrum for something like that (and it hasn't been implemented yet because, basically, we aren't at that stage yet. Lots of countries still have low unemployment rates.) But I think we'll get there inevitably. Once there's a baseline income for all people, products will have a "target" price point, considering that.

I think I would be Ok with that :D

But it would probably need an enormous political enterprise and not just be the result of "a market recalibrating" itself. Trusting that there will be some point in the future where something will eventually happen on its own might just lead to endless "delays" and "patchworks" instead of meaningful change.
 
It's pretty hard to expect countries who keep living in those worse standards to fund greeks's living better than they do. In reality those poorer countries won't have to do much, but after this referendum Greece lost most of their widespread support among other countries. Logic has left the building long ago.

Thats a very nice narrative, but whatever support Greece had was already gone about one month after Syriza got elected. Was the time it took for the other debtor nations to shift from "yeah, we kinda support that" to "sorry mate, moar austerity for you".

Who is he writing to? Afaik Prokopis Pavlopoulos is the Greeks President.
Is the letter for the "dear ECB president" ?

To Donald Tusk. Fixed.
 

Theonik

Member
Thats a very nice narrative, but whatever Greek support Greece had was already gone about one month after Syriza got elected. Was the time it took for the other debtor nations to shift from "yeah, we kinda support that" to "sorry mate, moar austerity for you".
What I need to know is what Varoufakis did to these people's wives.
 

Wiktor

Member
Thats a very nice narrative, but whatever Greek support Greece had was already gone about one month after Syriza got elected. Was the time it took for the other debtor nations to shift from "yeah, we kinda support that" to "sorry mate, moar austerity for you".

It was "sorry mate, moar austerity for you" in general public's eyes. Now it has switched to "let them starve"
 

2MF

Member
I wish people stopped saying that the EU / ECB / IMF rescued Greece.

What they did rescue was all the banks that held Greek debt, by transfering the risk to taxpayers. The banks are the real winners here.
 

Foffy

Banned
I think a system like that is beneficial even before we get to that point. The Swiss were actually considering it but it was rejected.

They rejected it? I thought it's still being pushed. Guaranteed incomes are being considered in Canada and Denmark now, too. I bet most of the world will have them before the United States does, even though the country actually has a system of this kind for Alaska.
 

LJ11

Member
Also as it's somewhat related, since it has been mentioned a lot and is apparently part of Greece's new bargaining position in their talks, regarding the recent IMF report on debt sustainability and the need for some form of relief (whether outright or through a more like maturity extension), The Economist wrote an article last week, they argue the current position is a result of the past six months of turmoil, wherein any gains made have evaporated.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2015/07/imfs-sad-story

They suggest that Greece's debt position would have been projected to fall to 117% GDP in 2020 and 104% GDP in 2022, given the more favorable economic signs at the end of 2014, rather than the now projected 150% GDP in 2020.

At a brief look at the summary of the DSA report, it seems a correct interpretation. So it actually seems kind of strange the Tsipras government has seized on this report as vindication, as while it does say that some form of relief is now necessary, it also attributes this need to recent policy changes and reiterates the need for a return to stalled policy implementation. I'm not sure if anyone has read the full text and could provide some further context.

It's all about growth, a lot of assumptions rely on it. Many feel that Greece's debt can be serviced so long as they're growing at a faster pace than their service payments, but the conditions of their loans (austerity) puts downward pressure. The primary surplus' they're forced to run curtails how they can grow. Govt should step in a bit since demand has essentially been destroyed. Hard to just keep cutting back, or increase taxes, and not put a damper on growth. Definitely should do a better job of tax collection however and find other sources of revenue.

Check this out during your free time.
 
I wish people stopped saying that the EU / ECB / IMF rescued Greece.

What they did rescue was all the banks that held Greek debt, by transfering the risk to taxpayers. The banks are the real winners here.

If I pay the loan for your house because you can't pay it anymore for whatever reasons. Did I help you or the bank?
 

Theonik

Member
They rejected it? I thought it's still being pushed. Guaranteed incomes are being considered in Canada and Denmark now, too. I bet most of the world will have them before the United States does, even though the country actually has a system of this kind for Alaska.
You're right. It was the government that opposed it. The referendum is still happening in 2016.

If I pay the loan for your house because you can't pay it anymore for whatever reasons. Did I help you or the bank?
If the bank is unable to repossess my home arguably it was only the bank that benefited.
In fact you didn't even pay my mortgage, you loaned me money to pay it! BASTARD!
HEY! LEAVE MY SHIPGIRL FIGURINES ALONE!
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
If I pay the loan for your house because you can't pay it anymore for whatever reasons. Did I help you or the bank?

If you ask him for the money (and with interest), you just helped the bank. He still has to pay the loan to you, nothing changed for him (except for more interest to be paid).
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
Depends, was i in any risk of losing the house if i didn't pay?

There is no mortgage because some smart guys (no irony here) considered these kind of loans the safer ones for a long time. So you keep the house either way. But you get your electricity and gas cut out because you can't pay them. But PdotMichael will lend you some money (with good interest - for him) to pay those if you agree not to eat 15 days a month.

Right now Greece gets loans with such low interest rates which it could only dream after a default.

Nobody is lending Greece anything on the free market.
 

Azih

Member
If I pay the loan for your house because you can't pay it anymore for whatever reasons. Did I help you or the bank?

If you loan me money so I can pay the minimum payment on my mortgage then you've given me a month of breathing room at the end of which I owe you AND the bank just as much. If your condition for this is also that I give away my car for peanuts then I'm even worse off than before because now I can't drive to my job to make money to pay you and the rest of my mortgage in another month. Then next month you go Oh HMM.. I'll lend you some more money so you can stumble on for another month but you've got to stop with these fancy veggies and just eat cheap ramen. Now I'm malnourished and have no car but hey aren't you great for 'helping' me.
 

2MF

Member
M°°nblade;171174308 said:
Yes, how dare they pay only half of it. :p
Never mind the new loans that had to be made.

They didn't pay half of it either. And the debt that WAS written off was held by private investors, not banks AFAIK.

New loans were made so that the old loans could be repaid, but that charade is near over now.
 
M°°nblade;171174308 said:
Yes, how dare they pay only half of it. :p
Never mind the new loans that had to be made.

If they aren't the only ones that beneffited from the loan (leaving aside the argument if it was to their benefit for a moment), why should they be the only ones on the hook for the money?

I'm sick of these mortgage comparisons.

Can someone explain it by comparing Greece to a railway? Or maybe a space station?

Now you've just killed my fun.
 

Theonik

Member
We should start using marriage analogies.

They didn't pay half of it either. And the debt that WAS written off was held by private investors, not banks AFAIK.
Part of the debt that was written down was forced to public institutions like universities and hospitals, insurance funds etc.
They forced them in accordance to the law to invest their cash reserves into bonds which they haircut a week later.
Since they belong to the public, they get no say in this matter.
 
Were interest rates the only cost that those loans entailed?

At the beginning of the year it was calculated that Greece would only pay 2.6pc of it's GDP to serve it's debt. This is not a crazy amount and the debt to GDP are quite misleading because of the conditions of the loans which are in favour of Greece like Greece could even get the interest back from the ECB if Greece can meet the bailout conditions.
 
At the beginning of the year it was calculated that Greece would only pay 2.6pc of it's GDP to serve it's debt. This is not a crazy amount and the debt to GDP are quite misleading because of the conditions of the loans which are in favour of Greece like Greece could even get the interest back from the ECB if Greece can meet the bailout conditions.

Which it can't meet unless it hits near-Chinese growth. Either way, wasn't what i asked. You know that those conditions came with resolutions that, when adopted, also contributed towards higher unemployment and a whole host of other factors. Thus the matter of cost.

I quite doubt that any country, five years ago, would've ever agreed to austerity if the population had been made aware that the cost would also entail 20%+ unemployment and 50% youth unemployment. Alas, hindsight. 20/20.
 

Theonik

Member
At the beginning of the year it was calculated that Greece would only pay 2.6pc of it's GDP to serve it's debt. This is not a crazy amount and the debt to GDP are quite misleading because of the conditions of the loans which are in favour of Greece like Greece could even get the interest back from the ECB if Greece can meet the bailout conditions.
Greece is already owed 1.9bn Euro for that but the Troika is refusing to release that as a bargaining chip and decided to instead let them not pay the IMF.
 
They didn't pay half of it either. And the debt that WAS written off was held by private investors, not banks AFAIK.
Private holders of debt being banks and investment funds.
Greek banks were under pressure from the European Central Bank to take part in the buyback.
National Bank of Greece SA, Eurobank Ergasias SA, Alpha Bank AE, Piraeus Bank SA and Hellenic Postbank.
 
Which it can't meet unless it hits near-Chinese growth. Either way, wasn't what i asked. You know that those conditions came with resolutions that, when adopted, also contributed towards higher unemployment and a whole host of other factors. Thus the matter of cost.

I quite doubt that any country, five years ago, would've ever agreed to austerity if the population had been made aware that the cost would also entail 20%+ unemployment and 50% youth unemployment. Alas, hindsight. 20/20.

China like growing wasn't part of the bail out conditions, no.
 
If you loan me money so I can pay the minimum payment on my mortgage then you've given me a month of breathing room at the end of which I owe you AND the bank just as much. If your condition for this is also that I give away my car for peanuts then I'm even worse off than before because now I can't drive to my job to make money to pay you and the rest of my mortgage in another month. Then next month you go Oh HMM.. I'll lend you some more money so you can stumble on for another month but you've got to stop with these fancy veggies and just eat cheap ramen. Now I'm malnourished and have no car but hey aren't you great for 'helping' me.

Amazing analogy.
 

Nivash

Member
I'm sick of these mortgage comparisons.

Can someone explain it by comparing Greece to a railway? Or maybe a space station?

Well, since you asked...

Back in the day GreekRail wanted to join the EURail. But Greekrail's rails weren't shiny enough so they painted it with silver paint and GermRail finally accepted them. Unfortunately, Euro trains were more expensive so they had to take out a loan but they figured they would make the money back soon enough-

Then the Great Derailing of 2008 happened. The world found out that GreekRail's rails were only painted with silver and no one wanted to use it any more. Because GreekRail was part of EURail they couldn't lower prices to be competitive and the debt mounted. EURail, led by GermRail, promised to loan GreekRail money as long as they in turn promised to fire half their staff and close the rail that ran through "unprofitable" towns. But because GreekRail still had the same prices as GermRail, and now worse service, people still wouldn't use it so the debt was still too high. GermRail responded by saying that more cuts were needed to make GreekRail profitable.

GreekRail's board of directors decided that enough was enough - even if they kept cutting for 15 years the debt wouldn't be manageable and decided that they either needed debt forgiveness or to restructure with lower prices. But they got nowhere with EURail. To show EURail that this wasn't manageable they organized a vote with its passengers whether or not they could accept more cuts on the chance that maybe the rail would be better in 15 years. The passengers voted for No.

Now GreekRail needs to decide on whether they want to accept more money and cuts from EURail or declare bankruptcy and restructure with lower prices under the new name of HellRail with Drachmas trains which, while not as fancy as Euro trains, would be cheaper. But a bankruptcy could also mean that they wouldn't be able to pay their employees or service the railway which could mean that for some time their customers wouldn't be able to travel the way they used to. It's not an easy decision.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom