Pai Pai Master
Banned
All I can say is that it was perfect. Slayven tears.
The only review that matters.
All I can say is that it was perfect. Slayven tears.
All I can say is that it was perfect. Slayven tears.
I haven't seen it yet but all these complaints about Ronan... so basically it's like all other Marvel films.
at what point do we roll out the "MAhVeL Baaybeee" because i think this film is going to have a pretty good weekend.
mon?
I think Weaving was real good fun as Red Skull (and the character design is class), Grillo and Redford were good in Cap 2 (although that's not your typical MCU villain I guess) and Pearce's performance in Iron Man 3 is good as well. Outside of that, no villain (sans Loki) has been very good.
Need Ultron and Thanos to be real steps up, danger wise.
Crazy if Guardians ends up being the only summer movie to crack a $100 million opening. Well deserved though.
I think Weaving was real good fun as Red Skull (and the character design is class), Grillo and Redford were good in Cap 2 (although that's not your typical MCU villain I guess) and Pearce's performance in Iron Man 3 is good as well. Outside of that, no villain (sans Loki) has been very good.
Need Ultron and Thanos to be real steps up, danger wise.
To be fair, it was close enough, but your point still stands.Apparently, they lied about Transformers' numbers. They were shy a few million.
http://www.deadline.com/2014/06/transformers-late-night-estimate-8-75m-on-path-to-mid-90m-opening/
People were saying Ronan is great villain apparently, so it's disappointing the movie didn't do much with him from reading these impressions.
Marvel villains have been mostly crap or forgettable, but I think part of that is because the movies never really focus on the villains. It's mostly about the protagonists. It's a flaw in a way, but I think it also keeps them more lighthearted that way. It doesn't really feel like any of these heroes have memorable villains and they're mostly tied up with Spider-Man or X-Men.
People were saying Ronan is great villain apparently, so it's disappointing the movie didn't do much with him from reading these impressions.
I suspect Thanos is going to be the first great one. All this build up has to end up with something with a lot of focus.
Loki has been a pretty entertaining villain. I haven't followed AoU and am not super familiar with Ultron but I can see him being interesting, too.
Loki has been a pretty entertaining villain. I haven't followed AoU and am not super familiar with Ultron but I can see him being interesting, too.
Ultron is the robot, right?
Another reason Thanos has to be great. It's Josh Brolin.
Edit:
Yep, that's what I thought. Robot Man. He has a chance of being something good. Since the foundation is out of the way, Avengers 2 can try to do something with a little more depth.
Ultron sounds great from the comic con footage
I need a description of that footage asap.
I need a description of that footage asap.
We start on a city scape and the whole team is assembled in Avengers tower. They’re all hanging out. Drinking beer, joking, and Hawkeye tells Thor the whole no-one-can-grab-the hammer thing is “a circus side show.” He disagrees and Stark tries to pick it up. “If I lift it do I get to rule Asgard?” he asks. Yes, Thor says. He fails on a first attempt. “I’ll be right back.” He puts on the Iron Man glove. No dice. He and Rhodie try, both in their Iron Man gloves. Nope. Hawkeye fails. Banner tries and really exerts himself. Everyone gives him a look. Next up is Cap and he budges it which really gets Thor worried. However, having all failed Thor says he has a simple theory “You’re all not worthy.” Just then a huge screeching sound. “You’re all not worthy.” Enter a brutally broken, almost zombie like metal being. It’s Ultron. “How could you be worthy? You are all killers. You want to protect the world but you don’t want it to change. There’s only one path to peace… your extinction.” Just then a bunch of other robots fly in and we get the Marvel Studios logo.
Ultron continues in voice over with a bunch of other images. “I had a vision … the whole world screaming for mercy.” People running away, escaping. “Everyone tangled in strings.” Banner all sickly looking on a place. “Strinnnngs.” Massive battle scenes, Hawkeye and others helping people evacuate. Banner in the snow, then a random hospital, Scarlet Witch on a bus, Thor smashing a tank. Then Tony Stark “It’s the end,” he says. “The end of the path I started us on.” Widow adds, “Nothing lasts forever.” We then see a screaming Hulk and the massive Hulk Buster armor. Black Widow on the Harley Davidson, Quicksilver running around, Andy Serkis as a human (!?!), more explosions, Iron Man flying by what looks like a prison and shooting some soldiers. Hulk throws a car at the Hulkbuster and then punches him through it. A quick shot of Widow and Hulk almost touching hands.
The whole time, a song has been playing about strings. It’s very eerie and morbid. Finally, we get a fully realized, metallic, 8 foot Ultron. Referencing his statement “There are no strings on me” as his clenching fist turns into the circle around the “A” of “Avengers: Age of Ultron.” The title card.
Then, after that, we see Cap’s shild broken, Tony Stark looking down at it, the camera pulls back and we literally see every member of the team laying on the ground in tatters on what may or not be Thanos’ tomb. They look dead.
I think it kind of had to be shallow. You have four superheroes and Whedon treated it as a stand alone movie in terms of structure. There is only so much you can do when you have to establish that many characters, build some sort of conflict between them (stupid as it was), and then bring them together for what people ultimately wanted to see.Yup, I still love The Avengers but that movie really is 80% about the team meeting up, arguing, and fighting, and only 20% actually being Avengers.
Cannot wait to see what Whedon does in the sequel.
Can't find the original link but I saved the text:
I think it kind of had to be shallow. You have four superheroes and Whedon treated it as a stand alone movie in terms of structure. There is only so much you can do when you have to establish that many characters, build some sort of conflict between them (stupid as it was), and then bring them together for what people ultimately wanted to see.
Avengers 2 has none of the baggage though. You can just hit the ground running. I'm expecting a much better movie to be honest. I feel Avengers was good entertainment, but the bar isn't high. I think the sequels will easily be better.
Avengers also takes an L for having the worst Cap suit in all of the movies. he looks super dumb in most of that movie.
The Cap suit wasn't bad. It was really just the helmet.
It needed a chin strap. They learned for Cap 2 and Age of Ultron.
I think Weaving was real good fun as Red Skull (and the character design is class), Grillo and Redford were good in Cap 2 (although that's not your typical MCU villain I guess) and Pearce's performance in Iron Man 3 is good as well. Outside of that, no villain (sans Loki) has been very good.
Need Ultron and Thanos to be real steps up, danger wise.
Avengers also takes an L for having the worst Cap suit in all of the movies. he looks super dumb in most of that movie.
I'm still angry the footage never leaked. >:|Can't find the original link but I saved the text:
I'm still angry the footage never leaked. >:|
Best Marvel movie.
It basically feels like Age of Ultron is the first Marvel movie where they're -really- focusing on the villain
Can't find the original link but I saved the text:
Thor 1 is just much as a Loki origin as it is a Thor origin.
Holy shit. Thanks guys.
Was Spader's voice changed at all for Ultron?
Not really, I don't think.