Remember, it's the songs Meredith listened to growing up. Most of the songs will likely still be from the 60's & 70's.I hope they'll fit some early 80s songs into vol. 2.
Remember, it's the songs Meredith listened to growing up. Most of the songs will likely still be from the 60's & 70's.I hope they'll fit some early 80s songs into vol. 2.
I dunno, since the second mix was for him after she was gone I could see her having made it from some later 70s to early/mid 80s songs. You know, so that while the first mix tape is the embodiment of her childhood memories, the second mixtape is the embodiment of Peter's memories of growing up with his mom.Remember, it's the songs Meredith listened to growing up. Most of the songs will likely still be from the 60's & 70's.
I dunno, since the second mix was for him after she was gone I could see her having made it from some later 70s to early/mid 80s songs. You know, so that while the first mix tape is the embodiment of her childhood memories, the second mixtape is the embodiment of Peter's memories of growing up with his mom.
First mixtape is the living memory of his mom. Second mixtape is the living memory of him and his mom.
I didn't really care to see this but after seeing that I'm not in love by 10cc is on the soundtrack I need to see this.
"Boring" is the single laziest word to use in a film review ever, and any critic who relies on such a subjective word in a film review is an immensely poor critic, in my opinion. Describing a film as boring doesn't tell me anything about the film, it just tells me about the reviewer. They should be explaining and breaking down why the film lost them. I found Boyhood to be absolutely enthralling. I also found myself bored during much of Godzilla. Does that make Godzilla a "boring" film? No! I just have different interests in films than the folks who were really into Godzilla do.
Again, haven't seen the movie, just relating what they said. They review movies and thought it was boring. That doesn't really make the film boring, or anything. It's their review."Boring" is the single laziest word to use in a film review ever, and any critic who relies on such a subjective word in a film review is an immensely poor critic, in my opinion. Describing a film as boring doesn't tell me anything about the film, it just tells me about the reviewer. They should be explaining and breaking down why the film lost them. I found Boyhood to be absolutely enthralling. I also found myself bored during much of Godzilla. Does that make Godzilla a "boring" film? No! I just have different interests in films than the folks who were really into Godzilla do.
I didn't really care to see this but after seeing that I'm not in love by 10cc is on the soundtrack I need to see this.
is this old? unused Nova helmet design from the movie.
also, apparently Nova is in the earlier draft of the movie but they ditch him to focus on StarLord.
Again, haven't seen the movie, just relating what they said. They review movies and thought it was boring. That doesn't really make the film boring, or anything. It's their review.
Sorely underwhelming film. For all I heard of Chris Pratt's "amazing" performance from others, Bradley Cooper's Rocket Raccoon and even Drax upstaged him as far as writing was concerned. Gamora's role within the team held such a lacking presence (besides love interest) that she's hardly even worth mmentionention. In addition, Ronan must be one of the most poorly established villains in a Marvel film to date. The time spent not building him up wasn't spent wisely on creating structure within the main cast either, so that's not a fallback. I also hated their use of licensed music (The Runaway's Cherry Bomb? Really?)
The only notable positives were Rocket Raccoon and the dogfight scenes leading up to the climax. I can't say I went in the film expecting the world, but neither the humor nor the action made the cut (a shame as I enjoy what I've read of the Guardians of the Galaxy comic). On the bright side, the comic relief beats a lot of the unbearable one-line junk sentenced onto viewers in The Avengers.
Totally agree the racoon steals the show but Pratt is great for what he is asked to do. The movie is just written for the Raccoon.
Cherrybomb made me laugh out loud. The villain was shallow but the film wasn't really about him anyways. It's about introducing space friends and their adventures.
It was different, it took chances, and most came out great for me. Sorry it wasn't your cup of tea.
Is it worth the extra price to see the 3D version?
Is it worth the extra price to see the 3D version?
anyone?
I saw it last night and thought it was fantastic. I know my kids are going to love Groot and Rocket, Pratt was excellent as Star Lord and I was pleasantly surprised by Drax who imho had some of the funniest lines in the movie.
Easily my favourite of the MCU to date.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0083SBMGW/?tag=neogaf0e-20Slightly unrelated, but does anyone know if there is, or will be, a Phase 1 collection released on DVD/BR?
Is it worth the extra price to see the 3D version?
I hope they'll fit some early 80s songs into vol. 2.
Yup.I'm gonna go buy most of the super hero movies in a moment. So The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man, Captain America: The First Avenger, Thor and Iron Man 2 are all part of Phase 1?
I have The Avengers already.
Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World and Captain America: The Winter Soldier are Phase 2?
I'm gonna go buy most of the super hero movies in a moment. So The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man, Captain America: The First Avenger, Thor and Iron Man 2 are all part of Phase 1?
I have The Avengers already.
Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World and Captain America: The Winter Soldier are Phase 2?
Is there a significance to the phases? I actually saw this movie last night and loved it. Made me want to get the rest of the movies on bluray lol. Batista was actually pretty good compared to his WWE stuff. He surprised me the most I think.
Phase 1 movies conclude in Avengers 1, phase 2 build to Avengers 2. I'm not sure if GotG counts as phase 2 though, since it seems to be building groundwork for Thanos in Avengers 3.Is there a significance to the phases?
I would regard it as phase 2.Phase 1 movies conclude in Avengers 1, phase 2 build to Avengers 2. I'm not sure if GotG counts as phase 2 though, since it seems to be building groundwork for Thanos in Avengers 3.
Is it worth the extra price to see the 3D version?
I dunno, since the second mix was for him after she was gone I could see her having made it from some later 70s to early/mid 80s songs. You know, so that while the first mix tape is the embodiment of her childhood memories, the second mixtape is the embodiment of Peter's memories of growing up with his mom.
First mixtape is the living memory of his mom. Second mixtape is the living memory of him and his mom.
Is there a significance to the phases? I actually saw this movie last night and loved it. Made me want to get the rest of the movies on bluray lol. Batista was actually pretty good compared to his WWE stuff. He surprised me the most I think.
Is it worth the extra price to see the 3D version?
One-shots (short films found on the Blu-Rays)
So something that never occurred to me, is there like a timeline for all these movies?
They don't really mention the year things take place unless it's relevant to the story. I'm sure someone put a timeline up, but was just curious.
Peter left in 1988 if I recall correctly, so if that's the case, that covers a lot of songs from the 80's.
There better be a spaceship fight with Danger Zone playing in the sequel.
Is it worth the extra price to see the 3D version?