Vehicles don't take up a weapon slot, but you obviously don't have access to your guns when you are piloting a vehicle. Not really comparable to powerups, which work in conjunction with your Arsenal.
Like it or not, spartan charge is part of your arsenal. So is ground pound. If you're using your weapons, it's harder when you have a speedboost on. Even harder the more you have active. And, you're not getting an advantage from the increased speed anymore. Vehicles have their own weapons and if you want to use the other two, just jump out temporarily. They also give you extra armored protection and often a strong third attack weapon. What's your point here again?
I agree that the issue is valuation. I disagree that the SOLUTION to the issue is to make speedboosts a 1HK.
OK. What's your solution? Make SB even lower REQ but without the SC? They already only take 2/3REQ. Make everything else cost more? That would be a huge overreaction to fix a uselessness issue with 1 REQ. What do you suggest?
I'm not arguing that Speed Boost should take up a weapon slot, or disable you access to other weapons. I'm saying that speed boost should not function as a third weapon. IMO, It, like the other powerups, should only provide passive enhancements.
Other than maybe overshield, how are they passive enhancements? Powerups are and have ALWAYS been active enhancements. They're supposed to give your spartan/armor a distinct advantage to someone who doesn't have them equipped.
The word(s) you're looking for is Armor Mods. Those are the passive enhancements. And they don't cost anything! With old speed boost (and the new, post-update one), once you're at level 5 there's no reason to call in a speed boost if you just enable enhanced thrusters. It gives you a constant enhanced sprint speed and recharges your shields while sprinting (the ONLY advantage to speed boost after the nerf), but it also thrusts you further and recharges thrust faster. Before level 5, 3REQ (or even 2) is just not worth spending on a speed boost.
As I've mentioned, there are other ways to improve the items valuation without encouraging people to sprint towards their opponents, which is generally poor practice in halo.
*Generally* poor practice, but not always. Generally, it's poor practice to fight two people at once, but if you have an overshield, it might be the right play. Generally, it's poor practice to crouch around a map to try to get sneaky melee or snipe kills, but if you have camo, it might be the right play. Generally, it's poor practice to fight an overshield player by yourself, but if you have damage boost, it might be a good idea. Same pattern with sprinting at the enemy. Without the speed boost, it's probably not a good plan, but with speed boost, you're exploiting your engagement advantage.
I don't agree with the logic in your thinking. Because a powerup allows you to pull off what would normally be a risky play, that means that it's going to encourage people to try the same play when they don't have it enabled? If that's your argument, then you must be talking about morons only.
This whole conversation, it sounds like your reasoning boils down to "I don't like it, at least partially because I don't like Spartan Charge". You don't like that it gives you a "third weapon". I adamantly disagree with this characterization. It's adding potency to an ability you already have, just like all the other powerups. At some point you have to have some actual defense of your position, and mentioning you don't call in REQs does nothing to help your case. The reason people told you to actually try it before you pretend you know what you're talking about is because talking with some type of authority or knowledge about a topic, when you have little to none is just ridiculous.
You accuse us of farming because we use it when we're playing lesser skilled players. You literally don't know what the fuck you're talking about and it shows. If I called in a mantis instead (another terribly shitty to use REQ), would that be ok in your eyes? I don't call in a mantis against other good teams because it's a piece of garbage. I don't call in the current SB against good teams either because it's a waste of REQ energy. I scale my REQ call-ins to the need for the situation. How the fuck you equate that to farming with no evidence to support the claim is just absurd.
EDIT: Also, implying that no opinions that don't agree with certain people are allowed is stupid. I disagree with Unknown on tons of shit, including CE's status as the GOAT ("HERESY!"). Pretty sure he was implying that the fact that we agree on something when we disagree on a bunch of stuff lends credence to his bias argument.