YourExWife
Member
stuff about spread.
The maximum and minimum constraints and their bullet placement *probabilities* may be consistent, but the results within the constraints are effectively random in their execution and communication to the player.
Your objection is akin to trying to correct someone saying that an ideal die will be a random choice between {1,2,3,4,5,6}, and you object saying that it's not an accurate assessment because the chances for each number will always be 1/6. This comes across as needless pedantry only to agree with the sentiment implied in the original statement anyway.
Also, Welcome to GAF!
EDIT: Put another way, the spread (commonly understood to be the final trajectory of the bullets) itself is random, but its dimensions are not. Would you approve using "grouping" instead, if we're gonna talk about "bullets"?