ArchedThunder
Banned
I am starting to get the feeling that you have no idea how video games function. And if that was a joke, smh.
The fact that you could even think I was being serious disturbs me.
I am starting to get the feeling that you have no idea how video games function. And if that was a joke, smh.
I can also adjust to sleeping on a rock but that doesn't mean it's as good as a bed.That is because you had them side by side. Your eyes get used to the faster frame rate and then when you see something slower it seems choppy. The same thing happens with going from a high frame rate game to a lower one. After a small adjustment period your eyes will become used to the slower frame rate and it doesn't matter anymore. I only play 60fps games every now and then so I don't have to readjust very often but I can see how that would bother people who do.
I can also adjust to sleeping on a rock but that doesn't mean it's as good as a bed.
I can also adjust to sleeping on a rock but that doesn't mean it's as good as a bed.
Just don't turn into Eazy & Thermight on me.
Duders, with some of the posts/posters we've seen in here recently... Anything is possible.The fact that you could even think I was being serious disturbs me.
Pondering whether I'd trade Halo 4's anti-aliased look, a blessed novelty for the series this generation, for twice the framerate has made me realize I am incredibly shallow, at least when it comes to jaggies.
The fact that you could even think I was being serious disturbs me.
Didn't you see where he said he was tired of arguing about it? That means that we've backed him in a corner and he can't work his way out so he quit, Over. Please be a little more sensitive to this babby.
But going back, I completely agree with Ghaleon. Was a well-reasoned response and a good point overall.
Well those were 4 skim-tastic pages.
Good job thinking the photoshop was real guys.
That fact that you think 60fps "doesn't matter" and there's "no real difference" disturbs me. I had no reason to doubt your seriousness after your "opinion" on frame rates.
Well those were 4 skim-tastic pages.
Good job thinking the photoshop was real guys.
Also thanks to Ellis for confirming the FOV hasn't changed much; it certainly didn't look like to me anyway.
Maybe you should actually read it before you call people out.
One dude thought it was real. One guy.
It's not real? I guess I should be a bit more skeptical about these new images coming from Mars too, huh?
I'm not saying it's a literal tradeoff, I'm saying if I had to make the trade I'm not sure what I'd do. Because I am shallow and hate jaggies that much.Halo 4 uses FXAA which takes up almost no frames, doesn't half it from 60fps lol.
And death to jaggies!
Halo: ForgeI would literally play a game where the environments were simple gray cubes, the characters were basically blue or red Lego dudes, and the gameplay was similar to halo if it meant that the fps and fov could be better.
So say we all.And death to jaggies!
Halo: Forge
Ship it.
Do you think I could sit on your throne one day?
Halo: Forge
Ship it.
I wonder what types of gun camos there will be.
If the direct-feed footage is to be believed, it's not even a contest.So say we all.
Will this be the most jaggy free Halo yet?
So say we all.
Will this be the most jaggy free Halo yet?
It wouldn't matter to you, there's no real difference between my throne of gold and your computer chair.
My computer chair has wheels and can spin. I think I'm fine here.
Halo |OT8| The One Where We Argue About Chairs and Shit Because We Have To Win At Least One Argument
Halo |OT8| The One Where We Argue About Chairs and Shit Because We Have To Win At Least One Argument
I would literally play a game where the environments were simple gray cubes, the characters were basically blue or red Lego dudes, and the gameplay was similar to halo if it meant that the fps and fov could be better.
I've always wanted a game that's almost entirely grayscale (save for maybe HUD elements or something). Still graphically impressive, very detailed 3D models, etc. Just no textures or skyboxes.
I'd play it if the frame rate was so high it came with an assurance that I would puke while playing.
mmmmm Justice.
The perfect post. There are things that I would also prefer before the 60 fps as well, but that's not saying I don't want it!I suppose it depends on your definition of 'need'. I think 60 fps is really a requirement for racing games and fighters, the sensation of speed and fluid movement are just not the same. But I'd rather have what Halo brings to the table in terms of visuals - skyboxes, huge environments, etc. - and underlying simulation and AI than have the bump to 60 fps.
I'd love to have both, but Halo doesn't need 60 fps. (What it needs is a rock-solid frame rate.)
HaloGAF complains about posting gifs 2 days ago and today wants more gifs. I don't get it.lol awesome. More funny gifs would be better than past 4 pages of discussion.
hahahahahhahahaaha Does your gold throne run at 60 fps?It wouldn't matter to you, there's no real difference between my throne of gold and your computer chair.
I'd play it if the frame rate was so high it came with an assurance that I would puke while playing.
Do you puke while looking at real life then? Its pretty much infinite fps.
HaloGAF complains about posting gifs 2 days ago and today wants more gifs. I don't get it.
Grey color - Forge Skin
Dull-as-Dishwater - Reach Skin
Red Tiger - CoD Did It So We're Doing It Skin
Gold - Dudebro Skin
I can't remember the last time Daedalius added to a conversation, instead of just commentating on it.
Spot on. Tho I've always felt that gun camos were just something for you to do while you wait in the menu. You can never distinguish gun camos mid game cuz shits going down. But I can see why they'd put them in there for the whole rpg level up stuff that's in every game now.
60fps, 90' FOV, drop the bass.
Ship it.
I can't remember the last time Daedalius added to a conversation, instead of just commentating on it.
Wut.
Having some random blob on your weapon bounce around like it was having a seizure wasn't looking "damn good".
OT but, buying AC3? Wal-Mart screwed up and has it for pre-order for $15...
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Assassin-s-Creed-3-Xbox-360-Xbox-360/20452320
Unless you are watching on a large TV there is no real difference, And honestly it still isn't a massive difference if you are, yes it is noticeable but it all it really boils down to is making it look a little smoother and cleaner. It mainly just makes you feel better about your purchase because it is "better".
It also has the side effect of making enemies appear smaller and possible less intimidating. Determining the proper FOV is a balancing act as both wider and tighter FOVs have their strengths and weaknesses based on the experience you're trying to convey.
Have we heard as to whether the active roster is in? I sometimes forget how ingrained that feature is in Reach; it will be sorely missed if it doesn't make it.
Have we heard as to whether the active roster is in? I sometimes forget how ingrained that feature is in Reach; it will be sorely missed if it doesn't make it.
Have we heard as to whether the active roster is in? I sometimes forget how ingrained that feature is in Reach; it will be sorely missed if it doesn't make it.
....and therefore creating the illusion of choiceWell, it also gives you a chance to change up what you stare at 99% of the time.