lazybones18
Banned
200 Multikills for 25k?
I accept your challenge
I accept your challenge
Griffball here I comelazybones18 said:200 Multikills for 25k?
I accept your challenge
wwm0nkey said:Griffball here I come
lazybones18 said:200 Multikills for 25k?
I accept your challenge
People play Uncharted for multiplayer?wwm0nkey said:I was going to get Uncharted 3 but man after playing the MP Demo I have to say this is the SHITTIEST MP games I have ever played and I loved Uncharted 2.
Comments like that come off as a tad douchey.Barrow Roll said:People play Uncharted for multiplayer?
You play Halo for the graphics?Zeouterlimits said:Comments like that come off as a tad douchey.
U2's multiplayer had a big following, especially on GAF.
GAF loves Sony though so that doesn't really count.Zeouterlimits said:Comments like that come off as a tad douchey.
U2's multiplayer had a big following, especially on GAF.
My post wasn't a reflection on the quality of Uncharted's multiplayer, it's just odd to me that someone would pass up on Uncharted 3 because the multiplayer might stink. That's like not really the main draw of the series at all (for me anyways). It would be like someone passing on AC Brotherhood because they thought the multiplayer sucked. Yeah it's there, but is that really why you're buying the game? Hell naw, I wanna see more of Drake's shenanigans!Zeouterlimits said:Comments like that come off as a tad douchey.
U2's multiplayer had a big following, especially on GAF.
Hey I loves me some Uncharted. I think Zeouterlimits misinterpreted my post.Tashi0106 said:GAF loves Sony though so that doesn't really count.
Until next year you'll get 24" PC displays for $200. So I'm going to wait.wwm0nkey said:Kind of want to play Halo CEA in 3D on one of those new Sony 3D headsets that make it feel like you are in a theater.
A gaffer posted his impressions of it and it seems good.
wwm0nkey said:One thing that sucks is that there are going to be way to many MP games to split up
I have to go from Battlefield 3 to Halo to Versus Ops from MGS
REALLY looking forward to Versus Ops though.
Yes Metal Gear Solid lolbobs99 ... said:MGS? As in Metal Gear Solid!??
Tell me more. Metal Gear with a solid multiplayer would blow most titles away.
wwm0nkey said:Tunavi's post reminded me the Holiday games about to hit very soon, so what is everyone final list?
Mine is
Battlefield 3
Metal Gear collection
Skyrim
Halo CEA
Dark Souls (borrowed Demon Souls from a friend and its addictive!)
.
Not to mention Blockout is a pretty generic name in the first place, and would have been a terrific official name for a Halo map at launch. The map in Sandbox was pretty good, I remember it; just like every other Sandbox skybox or crypt map, however, it was dog ass ugly.Steelyuhas said:An internal name for a map usually doesn't end of being the actual name of the map. I doubt it would have been called Blockout if the map wasn't cut.
I think all MP games are that way, or at least for me they are. Just play for fun, play with friends, play things you are entertained by. If you aren't having fun or enjoying yourself, why waste the time? Outside Halo 2 (BTB), I never really enjoyed playing Halo by myself. That's why I plan on picking up BF3 so I can play a shooter alone if I happen to be by myself. I don't care if I necessarily win or lose in there, though it is pretty awesome to win and have those exciting moments.Deputy Moonman said:I'm thinking that I will shy away from a lot of multiplayer games for a bit. I've been taking Reach matchmaking way too seriously and it ruins the experience when you do that. But I'm still really interested in Skyward Sword and Skyrim. I've also been considering picking up or renting Alan Wake. Never played it and I've had an itch to try it.
For the most part, that's what I try to do, even when playing alone. It seems like each day that I jump online to play some reach, my first 2-3 games have quitters, then my next 2-3 games I manage to stay positive or at least even while all three teammates go negative. At this point, I'm so frustrated I start playing poorly. It's like being drug through a cheese grater, naked. I don't like losing, but I try to take everything in stride and focus on positives like my individual performance. But when I'm trying to finish a weekly or daily that requires so many wins, i get really, really irritated with quitters and bad teammates.Striker said:I think all MP games are that way, or at least for me they are. Just play for fun, play with friends, play things you are entertained by. If you aren't having fun or enjoying yourself, why waste the time? Outside Halo 2 (BTB), I never really enjoyed playing Halo by myself. That's why I plan on picking up BF3 so I can play a shooter alone if I happen to be by myself. I don't care if I necessarily win or lose in there, though it is pretty awesome to win and have those exciting moments.
I hear that game is REALLY fucking shortKarl2177 said:CEA
Rage
Modern Warfare 3
+
I need to pick up another copy of Mirror's Edge
I still want to try it. I enjoyed the Borderlands gameplay and Fallout's visuals, and that's how it has been described to me. As for the length, I can blaze through FPS and RPGs while still getting all of the dialogue and the like. I beat Mass Effect in 17 hours with all possible side missions completed.wwm0nkey said:I hear that game is REALLY fucking short
wwm0nkey said:Dear 343i,
Please put a sub name with Halo 5 and Halo 6, saying Halo 5 and Halo 6 just does not feel right.
Reading the comments over in the gaming section about the new Xbox/Halo games.The Real Napsta said:WTF are you talking about?
wwm0nkey said:Reading the comments over in the gaming section about the new Xbox/Halo games.
It just really doesn't feel right seeing or even reading Halo 5 or Halo 6, hoping they put a title name on it like they did with Halo 1 (Combat Evolved)
Halo: The Reclaimer part 1.wwm0nkey said:Dear 343i,
Please put a sub name with Halo 5 and Halo 6, saying Halo 5 and Halo 6 just does not feel right.
I just want the numbers to stop really. I think 4 can get away with it but just barley.The Real Napsta said:It only seems weird because Halo 4 isn't out yet. Or do you want them to stop numbing them like Call of Duty?
Call of Duty 9: Modern Warfare 3
Here's my response:Jtwo said:Fallen: Halo
This is more of a personal one. I say this as a gigantic Bungie and Halo fan. I have a very soft spot for Halo and always will. But the brand just doesn't have the same cache it once did. At least with me. In large part due to over saturation, I feel. We've had a Halo release every year since 2007, not all of them incredible. Halo is no longer synonymous with console first person shooters. Halo lost the battle for premiere shoot franchise. Somewhere, it lost what made that first game so incredible. Personally, even though I love the Halo fiction, I think the fiction is actually one of the main problems with the series. Its too weird and inaccessible, and with the inclusion of things like earth and covenant campaigns it lost what made that first game so incredible: being trapped alone in a crazy environment. No Halo game has felt like that first one.
Last generation Halo was the godking of console franchises. This gen it just isn't. Last gen Halo was a technical marvel, this gen it just isn't. Last gen Halo defined Xbox Live, this just it just doesn't. Last gen Halo resonated with deep within my core, this gen it just doesn't.
Dax01 said:Interesting. I was coming in here to say the opposite. Halo has risen considerably this generation.
Halo 3's launch was an event. It made a huge splash on the online console area by including saved films, screenshots, four player online co-op, a basic game editor, and a robust matchmaking system. All of that and a ten-hour campaign, and you have a package most FPS games still have yet to put together. And that was four years go.
Halo 3's campaign, I felt, was on par with the first for one reason only: its encounters. They're literally a generation ahead of the first Halo's. Complex yet elegant, they're bigger and more involved with an expanded sandbox that take's Halo's design and pushes it further to give you more options. This post about The Ark, and this one about The Covenant illustrate why I'd say Halo 3 is as good as the first game.
Not including Halo Wars, the next big Halo game that released this generation was Halo 3: ODST, and I'd also put that on par with the first game. I really liked the gameplay of ODST in that one weapon wasn't sufficient to take out any enemy you came across, so you had to use everything you had on hand to clear out an encounter (and I think, largely, the encounters in ODST are a great step above Halo 1's, though fall behind Halo 3's). Plus, I loved the atmosphere in ODST, especially in the hub world. And that's another reason I love ODST: the hub world. I think it mostly succeeds in what it set out to do with the hub world when you consider the small development team and the small development cycle.
And I haven't even begin to discuss Firefight. That was definitely keeping up with the times.
Reach took the jack-of-all-trades, master of none approach. Its complete package is on the scale I haven't seen in another console FPS game. Campaign, Firefight, multiplayer, Forge World, saved films and screenshots...there's so much content in this game that even if you don't like one aspect of it, another part will keep you coming back. Despite my feelings of the game when it came out, I wouldn't place Reach on par with the first game.
I'm a campaign guy. Everything else is just icing on the cake.
And remember, you weren't alone in Halo: CE. You had marine buddies. Have you seen the Halo 4 Concept Art Trailer? 343 seems to be taking the franchise in the direction you want it to go.
Halo has evolved a lot from the first game. I don't think you can blame the franchise for evolving and then condemn it for not being the premiere console shooter anymore.
Dax01 said:1. What is it about CoD that removed Halo from being the console FPS? Is it something inherent within CoD's gameplay? Is it the marketing?
Barrow Roll said:Shadow Complex is finally going on sale again? Shiiiiiiiiit.
Halo 4: The Reclaimer Trilogy, Part 1wwm0nkey said:Dear 343i,
Please put a sub name with Halo 5 and Halo 6, saying Halo 5 and Halo 6 just does not feel right.
A+ postkylej said:Shadow Complex is nearly my favorite 360 game. Any and all who don't own this, stop being scrubs and buy it.
True but I can understand that paying the $60 is a lot for the 8ish hours, so when your extra incentive (the multiplayer) turns out to be poor/worse than the predecessors'....Barrow Roll said:My post wasn't a reflection on the quality of Uncharted's multiplayer, it's just odd to me that someone would pass up on Uncharted 3 because the multiplayer might stink. That's like not really the main draw of the series at all (for me anyways). It would be like someone passing on AC Brotherhood because they thought the multiplayer sucked. Yeah it's there, but is that really why you're buying the game? Hell naw, I wanna see more of Drake's shenanigans!
wwm0nkey said:I hear that game is REALLY fucking short
I agree wholeheartedly with this comment. It's completely worth any current price.kylej said:Shadow Complex is nearly my favorite 360 game. Any and all who don't own this, stop being scrubs and buy it.
Dax01 said:1. What is it about CoD that removed Halo from being the console FPS? Is it something inherent within CoD's gameplay? Is it the marketing?
In Halo - even Reach - poor players get destroyed by better and have a miserable time, even if they get the jump on other players. We have games posted in this thread were people are winning games without dying, or without the other team getting kills. In CoD it seems you can land kills much easier, so anyone can jump in and have some measure of success. (At least, that's what it looks like - I'm not a CoD player.)Dax01 said:1. What is it about CoD that removed Halo from being the console FPS? Is it something inherent within CoD's gameplay? Is it the marketing?
GhaleonEB said:In Halo - even Reach - poor players get destroyed by better and have a miserable time, even if they get the jump on other players. We have games posted in this thread were people are winning games without dying, or without the other team getting kills. In CoD it seems you can land kills much easier, so anyone can jump in and have some measure of success. (At least, that's what it looks like - I'm not a CoD player.)
It's not that simple and there's more too it (a better reward system is important), but I think that's much of it.
The Real Napsta said:Most games have Legacy bro.