I don't want to take sides (I guess I am) but remember all these "free" services must implement and maintain Xbox apps. Then they must create and maintain functionality for these apps to connect to their servers and provide content or perform a function. Yes, their website counterparts may be free but sometimes these additional bits are extras they didn't anticipate, or a way to make money because their others avenues are mainly free. The protocols, procedures, and implementation for Xbox are totally different than for a website. People still have to work and get paid. Not everything can be free.
Sure, I'd like a better system. Better is always good, but I am happy paying for Gold as it is (if there is another price hike with minimal features though...). I never pay the full price though and always catch a deal. I have a card ready to redeem I got for $35. Perhaps a system like PsychoRaven said would be great. That way people can at least play and do basic functionality. They'd still make a lot too, tons of people would still be willing to pay for the additional content. I would still. I like what I get out of it even if I can watch Netflix for no extra charge on my computer.
Another thing to note is how PSN is free and not up to par of Live (at least IMO) and got the shit hacked out of it. Sure that could happen to anyone but it sounds like they took it less seriously and it was underfunded.
Sure, I'd take dedicated servers in Halo, but I don't really care if they aren't there. What I'd really like to see is more reliable hosts chosen so there is less switching mid game. Surely it won't fully eliminate lag with dedicated servers though, you still have to request and wait for a response as well as the other players with you, so there is still the potential for lag. I believe that PC gaming has less lag, but I don't believe for a second it has no lag. If they can get in dedicated servers without causing other problems in Halo 4 or without having to sacrifice something then I am a fan, otherwise I'm good. Reach has been pretty good to me lag wise.
Sure, I'd like a better system. Better is always good, but I am happy paying for Gold as it is (if there is another price hike with minimal features though...). I never pay the full price though and always catch a deal. I have a card ready to redeem I got for $35. Perhaps a system like PsychoRaven said would be great. That way people can at least play and do basic functionality. They'd still make a lot too, tons of people would still be willing to pay for the additional content. I would still. I like what I get out of it even if I can watch Netflix for no extra charge on my computer.
Another thing to note is how PSN is free and not up to par of Live (at least IMO) and got the shit hacked out of it. Sure that could happen to anyone but it sounds like they took it less seriously and it was underfunded.
Sure, I'd take dedicated servers in Halo, but I don't really care if they aren't there. What I'd really like to see is more reliable hosts chosen so there is less switching mid game. Surely it won't fully eliminate lag with dedicated servers though, you still have to request and wait for a response as well as the other players with you, so there is still the potential for lag. I believe that PC gaming has less lag, but I don't believe for a second it has no lag. If they can get in dedicated servers without causing other problems in Halo 4 or without having to sacrifice something then I am a fan, otherwise I'm good. Reach has been pretty good to me lag wise.