StalkerUKCG
Banned
Now go buy Blood and Gold and the rest of the books.
Is that a GoT book? Anne Rice wrote a book called that too.
Now go buy Blood and Gold and the rest of the books.
Halos story is getting to comic book levels
Of stupidly ridiculous
It's volume two of an overall single book.Is that a GoT book? Anne Rice wrote a book called that too.
As a guy who spent $40 on Happy Wars to beat my friends and have better gear then them, and as a guy who spent $100+ on his Avatar, trust me, I know.
Is that a GoT book? Anne Rice wrote a book called that too.
i knew one guy who changed his name at least 11 times over the span of 2 two years
Halos story is getting to comic book levels
Of stupidly ridiculous
The "replacement... for the ring you destroyed," not Delta Halo. Alpha Halo (2) is the Ark's replacement ring.
It's become ridiculously complex, without adding any actual depth to the narrative.I've always thought it was ridiculous, that's half the charm imo.
Paperbacks for books 3 and 5 are split in the UK, as far as I'm aware there are no US versions that are split though.I've seen all of the books split into parts and each with different subtitles here lately, though I've never seen them like that in a book store.
As a guy who spent $40 on Happy Wars to beat my friends and have better gear then them, and as a guy who spent $100+ on his Avatar, trust me, I know.
yeah, we all know juices too.
It's become ridiculously complex, without adding any actual depth to the narrative.
And the basic idea that you have to consume the narrative in several different medium forms to understand what the fuck is going on in a game is a ludicrous idea.
Paperbacks for books 3 and 5 are split in the UK, as far as I'm aware there are no US versions that are split though.
I removed it because it's a plot point in the Forerunner trilogy, in which the reader didn't know that he had done that until the book revealed it to him/her if they had not read any other Halo fiction. I originally didn't have the spoiler tag and edited it in just in case, I don't see how it's pointless but I don't think it was required.
It's pointless because the rest of your post basically said the shit you spoilered.
It's pointless because the rest of your post basically said the shit you spoilered.
And it was in the terminals in Halo 3.
And it was in the terminals in Halo 3.
The story of this season has been: sometimes steroids help speed things along.
PS4Since DestinyGAF doesn't exist yet, for those who plan to get the game, what system are you getting it for?
Since I'm leaning towards XbOne as first console purchase, I'm probably going to get Destiny for that.
If I decide to not even get any consoles at launch, I'll probably go Xbox 360 then.
Since DestinyGAF doesn't exist yet, for those who plan to get the game, what system are you getting it for?
Since I'm leaning towards XbOne as first console purchase, I'm probably going to get Destiny for that.
If I decide to not even get any consoles at launch, I'll probably go Xbox 360 then.
Also, about MC's new poncho, I'd say that might have been added in just so you didn't know what the game was, lol.
Also, about MC's new poncho, I'd say that might have been added in just so you didn't know what the game was, lol.
Aren't "RS" and "LS" labeled wrong?
Halo 5 is the sequel to Poor Little Glassman:
Poor Little Master Chef, Starring UNSC and Friends
edit:
Aren't "RS" and "LS" labeled wrong?
was truly an epic reveal
Quick! What's a weapon that could benefit from ignoring player shielding without being unbalanced? It doesn't have to be from Halo.
Why big pictures? Because, buck Elzar.
Yep, that sure looks like The Ark.
Oh look, cracked and everything. Second level = Chief is rebuilt, errything ok.
No mention of "Reclaimer Saga", strange.
Buck Elzar.
Since DestinyGAF doesn't exist yet, for those who plan to get the game, what system are you getting it for?
Since I'm leaning towards XbOne as first console purchase, I'm probably going to get Destiny for that.
If I decide to not even get any consoles at launch, I'll probably go Xbox 360 then.
XB1 for me. I want a dedicated server for this game.
Uhhhhhh....I ummmm...nevermindXB1 for me. I want a dedicated server for this game.
Quick! What's a weapon that could benefit from ignoring player shielding without being unbalanced? It doesn't have to be from Halo.
Yeah, that really does look like the Ark.
Also, that MC close up makes we wonder if they used game assets for this CG trailer. It looks possible.
Has it been confirmed that you'll be getting dedicated servers with the Xbone?
Uhhhhhh....I ummmm...nevermind
I thought that's why they are going to have 300,000 servers world wide for? So other gaming companies can make better MMO?
Sorry to disappoint you
Gravity Gauntlet.
Sorry to disappoint you
wait what?
I'm not 100% sure, but apparently they didn't mean Dedis for every single game. Only a select amount like Halo 5 & some others.
They meant anyone who can cough up the cash can use them.
Chief's gonna cry about Cortana throughout the entire game, isn't he?This shot is still dope.
So (as of the 360's current Gold count) around 50 million people are already paying for them? I'm sure MS doesn't care where they're getting their Gold revenue from (360 or One) at this point since they're transferrable between consoles. Just as long as that number continues to go up, I have trouble believing they'll have that many dedis up and for that long. The only first party game that had dedis this gen from MS (as far as I remember) was Gears of War 3 and they locked that behind DLC when the 2nd map pack came out so I'm expecting them to start locking things behind even more paywalls.
They meant anyone who can cough up the cash can use them.
It's not about dedis just for one game, that's not how Azure works at all. The global system is able to load balance, use redundancy, scaling, caching and all the nice benefits of the cloud and multiple datacentres in various regions.
Azure is already a multi-billion dollar multi-region network of AAA-grade datacentres. Essentially the premise is if one game has within 1 hour a massive in flux of say 250,000 concurrent players it will scale to that performance. If that drops off the very next day it would scale back.
In terms of outages you'd go from say 25-100 ms on a local datacentre to say 50-200ms on a foreign datacentre. Azure launched in 2010 and is in use by far more demanding systems than concurrent multiplayers. Websites, email, databases, web services, currency exchange, mining data, GIS mapping and more industries generate more data and concurrent connections than gaming will or does right now.
Take a look at the Wikipedia page for the most significant outages of Azure:
2012-02-29 Incorrect code for calculating leap day dates[17]
2012-07-26 Misconfigured network device[18][19]
2013-02-22 Expiry of an SSL certificate[20] Xbox Live, Xbox Music and Video also affected
That is very little outage time globally, honestly my local ISP, retail shops or DDOS websites like Amazon have more outages every year. You're barking up the wrong tree with the wrong information.
Ah, but I forgot about Azure. Of course, where else would MS have the computing power to handle this and of course that must be their magic "power of cloud". I could see that working, imo I think it'll be a little more strained than what you're giving it credit for; but I digress. I'm sure we'll see how it turns out, an upside to it is that since it's run across dataservers in the US there'll be lower latency in the US (like you said) so that's a pretty nice benefit for US users; though the entire console seems more like the Americabox rather than one for many foreign countries. The scaling is also a nice effect since it decreases operation costs of servers for MS if I'm understanding it correctly.
From the little I know and understand of Azure it certainly seems like a very, if not the, most complex and flexible service for handling whatever data the console would be using for its media services, check-ins, games and etc. But I can't help think, if it starts to have issues (as little as they've happened), in whatever time frame from now the One is still going and has amassed as many users as the 360; 50 million would be essentially locked out of their content along with whatever corporate data that other users may be locked out of it. It's obvious that MS is putting a lot of trust in Azure (as its track record has few problems I'd say that it's not unwarranted trust). But designing all the functionality and usage of a console that is all digital at this point is a bad idea, no matter how stable your service because there will always be unforeseen problems, and Azure's track record can only worsen as more load is put onto it. To talk more about the scaling, if it's hit with millions of users within an hour timeframe and, say, couldn't handle it; what would happen? I'm expecting loads of errors on launch day for many people buying the One, if not then sure I can eat my own words I don't have a problem with that. Honestly, I'm not the best person to argue with this about since knowledge of networking is slim to none, I appreciate the time you took to type all that though and I did understand most of it, thank you.