GO see it, its an enjoyable movie, not something Oscar=worthy but enjoyable.EviLore said:Hrm, very negative reactions, I'm gonna have to see it.
yepRelix said:GO see it, its an enjoyable movie, not something Oscar=worthy but enjoyable.
EviLore said:Hrm, very negative reactions, I'm gonna have to see it.
Yea... no.Relix said:GO see it, its an enjoyable movie, not something Oscar=worthy but enjoyable.
AmMortal said:I have not watched the movie, but I have concluded that Hancock is a SAIYAN!
How old are you?Phaethon0017 said:Funniest part of the whole movie was:lol. I thought I was gonna pass out from laughing.when he shoved that dude's head up that other guy's ass.
Phaethon0017 said:when he shoved that dude's head up that other guy's ass.
Phaethon0017 said:I liked it. Most of the funny moments are already in the trailer. Funniest part of the whole movie was:lol. I thought I was gonna pass out from laughing. Overall a good movie, I recommend you go see it. Plus you get to see the DTESS trailer. I didn't even know they were making it.when he shoved that dude's head up that other guy's ass.
Pretty sure it was.Iceman said:was that or was that not White Power Bill?
pizzaguysrevenge said:How old are you?
Oblivion said:I think Hancock a really cool premise, just needed a tad better execution, clear up some of the conflicting issues about the powers, and get a better villain, and it would have been great.
beelzebozo said:you should listen to this week's episode of filmspotting. they talk about hancock, and apparently the script has been circulating in hollywood for years. big, big tone and script revisions were made. i wonder what sort of movie this would have been had they actually filmed the original script (not to say that was definitely immaculate or anything--could have been better, could have been worse)
Oblivion said:I'll have to check that out, actually. The only other thing I know about the script is that it was supposed to be a lot darker, involving some statuatory rape even or something like that.
Next we jump to the crucial character. Well call him HANCOCK; like John Hancock. His character at the beginning opens up to showing a man who looks lonely. He goes to differently slimy hotels (the kind where you can hear the ladies of the night doing their thing). He even takes his shot at getting prostitutes but he cant get his best friend below up for that. You see Hancock is not your Superman, with the nice hair, gentleman like. Hes maybe like many guys you see and know except he has exceptional abilities such as super strength, but hes also ill inside. Hes quick with his words so much he sounds like an adult version of Dr Seuss. Shoot, he can even fly!. . .
Meanwhile, back in la-la land Hancock, although he is superhero, he is not all there. Perhaps its the years of being a superhero. All the crimes, the loneliness, but also the abilities he has can be an impairment. But Mary has a thing for Hancock. And why not? Her husband ignores her likes tomorrow utility bill payment. One night, Hancock flies to her window. He asks her to go with him.. He whisks her to some deserted area in Brooklyn, He has food, lights (well theyre flares) and music (really a boom box; this is NYC you know!) She doesnt know what to think. She does like him, but inside she loves her husband. She tells Hancock she cannot accept his advances. But he is having a hard time accepting and this is where Mary gets nervous. What they both dont know. The police have been searching for Hancock. Why? Well we see him as a superhero but you know cops siempre metido en what they dont need to be. In minutes we now see SWAT team closing in. And Hancock starts to feel anxiety!?
beelzebozo said:here's a review from 2007 for the script, originally titled tonight, he comes. some of the highlights:
:lol
bolded that last line because it just cracked me up. wtf is with that shit? anyway, it's a pretty interesting read.
beelzebozo said:have you seen the rundown, oblivion? if you liked the sort of comedy in the first half and would appreciate some good action as well, it was one of peter berg's movies prior to this and is much more solid. i recommend it.
You can read the script here - get it while you still can.beelzebozo said:here's a review from 2007 for the script, originally titled tonight, he comes. some of the highlights:
:lol
bolded that last line because it just cracked me up. wtf is with that shit? anyway, it's a pretty interesting read.
Ninja Scooter said:btw can someone make sure that when the numbers are finally revealed the box office thread is titled "Will Smith's epic 'cock beats off competition"?
Personally, I find the original version much more interesting but it wouldn't have worked with Will Smith as lead. Guess they needed him to get a resonable budget for special effect etc though.Oblivion said:Holy shit. :lol I've been wondering about what could have been, but I think I should be thankful Hancock ended up the way it did, if that was the alternative. :lol :lol
You really haven't seen a lot of movies then.open_mouth_ said:one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Just ridiculously bad. This is what happens when "hollywood" tries to make a super hero movie. They just throw shit at the wall and pick out what sticks. I figured it would be crap going in, but I had a little hope. oh well
Did you see it?omg rite said::lol
Even more so, this is getting the most mixed reactions from people ever. I mean you have a pretty even number of like and dislike in the thread at this point.
Phaethon0017 said:I liked it. Most of the funny moments are already in the trailer. Funniest part of the whole movie was:lol. I thought I was gonna pass out from laughing. Overall a good movie, I recommend you go see it. Plus you get to see the DTESS trailer. I didn't even know they were making it.when he shoved that dude's head up that other guy's ass.
beelzebozo said:the rundown is actually much more balanced than hancock. dwayne johnson deserves some props for that movie--he was fantastic.
Costanza said:Did you see it?
omg rite said:Not yet. Either tonight or tomorrow.
I know GAF is EAGERLY anticipating my opinion.
I think you're looking for the Wanted thread.Darko said:you'll like the beggining and be disapointed the rest of the movie isnt like that.
Dali said:I think you're looking for the Wanted thread.
pizzaguysrevenge said:Are the people in this thread praising Hancock the same people who bash IJ4?
If so, give up on movies. You have no taste in cinema. You suck.
Wanted is brought down by the fact that the rest of the movie doesn't come close to the awesomeness of the opening hit.omg rite said:What? I'm not sure what you meant by that. Hopefully it's not "Wanted was only good in the beginning" because the whole thing ruled.