Fuck yes.
Did they ever make him into a real character in SC2?
Sadly no
Fuck yes.
Did they ever make him into a real character in SC2?
be prepared to fight me while you're fighting me?Yes. It's always been meant to catch people who thought they were safe. You can't run or hide from illidan..... you have to be prepared to fight him.
Have they done this before? I guess it could be an elegant solution.I'm not saying I want this, but just for the sake of discussion...
What if they gave Hunt a reverse radius? Like you can't use it inside "x amount of range". So it's mobility use is still in tact but just using it as an engage post engage in a fight or as an interrupt isn't as common.
I like this idea make the stun conditional on travel distance.Both things are likely true here. Meta needs a buff, Hunt needs the stun removed (or removed as a short-range stun, which would actually be quite the clever solution.)
be prepared to fight me while you're fighting me?
Xul will get nerfed and the combo will die on its own.We live in a world where casters can now justify first ban Chromie. Plz nerf into hell and oblivion and non-existence. Thx.
but that's not how how hunt is used exclusively, it's also used during ongoing fights with no one running away. I'm not opposed to buffs either, meta in particular is a terrible terrible talent that doesn't even make you feel powerful as illidan.Yea. You don't get to run away. That's the whole point of the heroic.
If they nerf it, it should be CD or damage. But honestly he doesn't need nerfs. There are a million ways that illidan gets shit on already. Nerfs would make him not pickable once again.
R20 stomping GFE's split push cheese is so good.
but that's not how how hunt is used exclusively, it's also used during ongoing fights with no one running away. I'm not opposed to buffs either, meta in particular is a terrible terrible talent that doesn't even make you feel powerful as illidan.
Alternatively you could make the windup for Illidan channeled so any damage not just displacement or stuns would interrupt it. Almost no difference for the intended use but much more counterplay potential during fights.
The easy solution is to just remove Chromie from the game, from WoW lore, and just pretend it never happened.
If that leak is real, and we get a firebat two heroes from now, his name better be Gui Montag
It's being used in CC chains in teamfights now, which is why it's a topic of discussion.Hunt should def have a stun, when you pick it it's just as much about the stun as it is about the range.
That's exactly what I'm arguing he shouldn't be able to use his ult during team fights or have the stun removed for the reasons I've mentioned. Those being it doesn't fit his kit conceptually, it's not just used as intended and is off CD far too quick.Yea... no... I'm still not seeing how hunt needs a nerf.... you just think he shouldn't be able to use his heroic during team fights? Sounds fair
He definitely needs to get moved to Specialist, have his shields reduced and his damage buffed some to compensate.Pls Blizzard, change tassadar to assassins role, 99% are going DPS route shielding themselves
I looked it up and Meta was bodied 1 and a half and 2 or so years ago, there's been periods of Illidan play since and it's been straight Hunt since.
Since he's existed? He's extraordinarily sticky w/ insane self-sustain and is definitely supposed to be a cleaner character, but the fact that his base kit has had 0 hard cc until Hunt came back in the Meta has been part of his design for eons.when was illidan supposed to be a 0 cc character? like im surprised to hear this. before genji came out he was the best fight cleaner and like 40% of this is because q is a cc and automatically makes you bodyblock
Where has Illidan seen play besides a spot game here or there since? I can't recall a time without Meta. Who was playing it? Did they win? I think the correct way to say that is that people would say is there an Illidan hero in the game? Not the heroic, but the whole hero.
you can argue Azmodan has CC in his base kit that way because of his large body.when was illidan supposed to be a 0 cc character? like im surprised to hear this. before genji came out he was the best fight cleaner and like 40% of this is because q is a cc and automatically makes you bodyblock
according to Masterleague.net he was picked or banned in 51% of games from the Greymane Patch up till the Samuro patch which is most of 2016 including Blizzcon.
Heck Dignitas main issue of 2016 was that they had no Illidan player, they cut wubby to pick up Alex so they'd free up jayPL to be melee flex including Illidan.
you can argue Azmodan has CC in his base kit that way because of his large body.
oh wow you're right, where they stupid? they even picked meta on towers and cursed hollow.
Yeah, this is a definitional issue. When we say "CC" in this context, we mean hard CC.his q is rehgar lvl 16 e on someone, have you guys never used q as a cc? have you never had someone running away and you q'd them and suddenly your entire team was able to catch up?
do you guys really think of illidan this way, since alpha it's been a bad idea to take fights with illidan in large spaces or to overextend in lane w/ him mia
like maybe I just assumed too much, but literally the first day I played him I thought "wow this guy is really good at stopping someone and it has such a low cd"
like maybe im misusing the word in a technical sense, but q has always rang out as cc in my head
If you look at the builds, though, they are almost all Metamorphosis which was my point to begin with. When he was played, that's what people use.
I only see one match in that time frame that used The Hunt.
To be clear, I understand in an argument we're in there with the champ when trying to convince you of anything, but this is a weird hill to die on even for you IMO.
Yeah, this is a definitional issue. When we say "CC" in this context, we mean hard CC.
He's always been soft CC, of course, which is why the "heavy slow" as a change (a la Varian) would be fine as well- but I really like the "slow at short range, stun at long" idea.
It got picked in the last R20 game but that's because Hunt's global is actively useless on BoE and they didn't have any CC to chain into.More importantly than it's viability is that it just doesn't feel rewarding now, the ability doesn't pack a punch until 20. They might as well put bolt of the storm there.
People pick bad talents for dumb reasons but there's not even dumb reasons to pick meta.
Ya, the point of the discussion isn't to nerf Hunt's upsides, it's raising the "should it really have this niche upside" in an era where the devs have heavily, heavily cut back on hard CC.it legitimately does not give anything of real value at 10 now whereas hunt is as valuable as it ever was, and hunt still has the same weaknesses of not being great on small maps or maps that encourage grouping, it's still countered heavily by positioning or just general awareness of the map.
My idea of Illidan is a highly mobile melee assassin that can effortlessly weave in and out of combat. He's disruptive through stickiness not through slows, roots, stuns etc.his q is rehgar lvl 16 e on someone, have you guys never used q as a cc? have you never had someone running away and you q'd them and suddenly your entire team was able to catch up?
do you guys really think of illidan this way, since alpha it's been a bad idea to take fights with illidan in large spaces or to overextend in lane w/ him mia
like maybe I just assumed too much, but literally the first day I played him I thought "wow this guy is really good at stopping someone and it has such a low cd"
like maybe im misusing the word in a technical sense, but q has always rang out as cc in my head