Oh shit :lolLaurent said:UPDATE: WOW, THE THREAD IS DELETED... He removed his comment!?
Oh shit :lolLaurent said:UPDATE: WOW, THE THREAD IS DELETED... He removed his comment!?
Crayon Shinchan said:Reading that press release doesn't give this impression at all. Where are you getting it from?
The exclusive HD DVD commitment will include all movies distributed by Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks Pictures, Paramount Vantage, Nickelodeon Movies and MTV Films, as well as movies from DreamWorks Animation. Movies directed by Steven Spielberg will however continue to be released in both HD DVD and Blu-Ray formats.
Laurent said:No the forum isn't down, the thread as been deleted...
ManaByte said:
Levy further clarified the Paramount/DreamWorks press release, saying that "...his movies, like 'Saving Private Ryan' and 'War of the Worlds,' are not included in that deal. They are not exclusive to HD DVD, nor [are they] planned for that format at this time.'"
Levy went on emphasize that beyond 'Close Encounters,' Spielberg has no other films in the high-def pipeline on either format. "At this moment, there are no plans for something further [on either format]. Anything in the future will be decided on a title-by-title basis. There certainly won't be more titles in 2007."
...or he's getting a small but neat money hat...Crayon Shinchan said:I imagine it's because he said something he wasn't quite prepared to back up (i.e. FU to Transformers 2). It's possible he's probably learning of the details at the same rate we are; so he was told yes money hats were exchanged, no you can't do anything about it, but the exclusivity will be over by the time T2 is out.
Nonetheless, it's pretty clear he's not happy about the situation.
ManaByte said:
Perhaps he thought about it, and the $100,000 in royalties he's losing from BD sales, is outweighed by the +10 Million he'll be paid to make Transformers 2.. :lolLaurent said:No the forum isn't down, the thread as been deleted...
Crayon Shinchan said:Those are words from an article writer. He's assuming. As are you.
The official word from Spielbergs PR themselves is:
Levy further clarified the Paramount/DreamWorks press release, syaing that "...his movies, like 'Saving Private Ryan' and 'War of the Worlds,' are not included in that deal. They are not exclusive to HD DVD, nor [are they] planned for that format at this time.'"
i.e. Marvin Levy, a dreamworks marketing executive and long time spokesman for Spielberg.
Laurent said:...or he's getting a small but neat money hat...
Crayon Shinchan said:I imagine it's because he said something he wasn't quite prepared to back up (i.e. FU to Transformers 2). It's possible he's probably learning of the details at the same rate we are; so he was told yes money hats were exchanged, no you can't do anything about it, but the exclusivity will be over by the time T2 is out.
Nonetheless, it's pretty clear he's not happy about the situation.
thaivo said:Perhaps he thought about it, and the $100,000 in royalties he's losing from BD sales, is outweighed by the +10 Million he'll be paid to make Transformers 2.. :lol
DarkJediKnight said:He said it in anger. Transformers is clearly a franchise now. And it's Michael Bay's own thing now. He's never had a franchise and realized that he was out of line. And he was. Paramount pays him to make movies, not make marketing decisions.
DarkJediKnight said:He said it in anger. Transformers is clearly a franchise now. And it's Michael Bay's own thing now. He's never had a franchise and realized that he was out of line. And he was. Paramount pays him to make movies, not make marketing decisions.
...so he removed his comment after learning that he would get money. I'm not judging him, I'm just adding another assumption...Crayon Shinchan said:... so... ?
Crayon Shinchan said:He probably did make that rationalization. But he did make the comment. So it's clear he wasn't happy about it.
As a director, would you be happy if suddenly the audience that could see your films in the best quality possible is cut by 2/3rds?
Laurent said:...so he removed his comment after learning that he would get money. I'm not judging him, I'm just adding another assumption...
thaivo said:If I was a director, I'd probably be upset in the same way. Bay may be pro-BD or not, but it is funny that there were BD fans cheering him on for saying what he said, and then the thread was killed. :lol If I were a Bay fan, I'd have lost a little bit of respect for the man. Then again, everyone makes mistakes... his could have been one in the millions of dollars.:lol
VanMardigan said:It's not just the article writers that are stating Spielberg dual format releases, though. Rob Moore, President Worldwide Marketing, Distribution and Home Entertainment for Paramount Pictures:
Spielberg, however, is a huge supporter of Blu-Ray and always has been and wants the titles to be available in both formats - so those will be cross-platform titles.
That's from the same quote you guys are giving mana a hard time about.
VanMardigan said:It's not just the article writers that are stating Spielberg dual format releases, though. Rob Moore, President Worldwide Marketing, Distribution and Home Entertainment for Paramount Pictures:
Spielberg, however, is a huge supporter of Blu-Ray and always has been and wants the titles to be available in both formats - so those will be cross-platform titles.
That's from the same quote you guys are giving mana a hard time about.
Actually that was what I meant by if I was a director, I'd be upset too. As a filmmaker, you definitely want your film to be in the most hands as possible.jjasper said:What he said was in no way pro-Bd it was more I want everyone to have a chance to see my movie.
thaivo said:Actually that was what I meant by if I was a director, I'd be upset too. As a filmmaker, you definitely want your film to be in the most hands as possible.
"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For them to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks! They were progressive by having two formats. No Transformers 2 for me!"
Alright, let me quote you again...Crayon Shinchan said:But what's that add?
It's pretty clear to me; he wasn't pleased about this deal which took him by surprise. That he took down the comment doesn't mean he's recanted his position and came out and said something along the lines of: Actually, I think this is a very positive thing now that I've thought about it.
Nowhere did you imply that he could be getting money to shut up. Maybe it was obvious that you were insinuating this, but I didn't read it as obvious as you seem to state it... I read that "moneyhats were exchanged between Paramount and HD-DVD God" and not between him and Paramount, otherwise he would have known that...Crayon Shinchan said:I imagine it's because he said something he wasn't quite prepared to back up (i.e. FU to Transformers 2). It's possible he's probably learning of the details at the same rate we are; so he was told yes money hats were exchanged, no you can't do anything about it, but the exclusivity will be over by the time T2 is out.
Hey folks, Harry here. Woke up with the following press release in my InBox, then shortly thereafter, I received a phone call from Rob Moore, President Worldwide Marketing, Distribution and Home Entertainment for Paramount Pictures - who is doing a flurry of interviews today - in articles you'll read tomorrow in the NY TIMES, LA TIMES, USA TODAY - etc. You see - this is a big deal, because this means that alongside UNIVERSAL, PARAMOUNT is going EXCLUSIVE to HD DVD.
So, the first question I asked Rob Moore was... "Why would PARAMOUNT/DREAMWORKS choose the allegedly losing format in this format war?"
Rob responded that the keyword there was "Allegedly". It seems that according to their studies, the people that buy stand alone players - buy more dedicated film product... so, due to Toshiba's commitment to getting quality equipment at the under $300 barrier - means to the execs at Paramount, that this is the format to support.
I then countered with, "But isn't Sony supposed to introduce an under $300 Blu-Ray player this Holiday season?"
Rob responded that they have heard that, but it hadn't been assured yet. So next, I asked, "Why support either format exclusively - wouldn't providing content to supporters of both formats be the way to go?" Rob responded that concentrating on one format allows them to concentrate on content for that format exclusively, thus giving better product for the format they support. It also means that they can begin opening up their library and getting more product out for the format. Which is a very good thing for those of us on HD.
I then asked when the INDIANA JONES set would hit and if it would be exclusive to HD. Rob responded that on the films that Spielberg, however, is a huge supporter of Blu-Ray and always has been and wants the titles to be available in both formats - so those will be cross-platform titles. However, the rest of Dreamworks, Viacom/Paramount's world... those will be HD DVD exclusive for the next few years at least. Can you imagine BLOCKBUSTER not letting people rent TRANSFORMERS, SHREK THE THIRD, etc? Me Either. This format war is a fascinating chess game, isn't it?
Next, I talked with Alan Bell, the Chief Technology officer for Paramount. He's been in charge of the technological decisions and realities for Paramount, since the advent of DVD. I asked Alan if he was happy with this decision, or if this was something that was being forced upon them.
Alan then went into a very complicated series of statements about how HD DVD was the format that makes sense for Paramount. It's not just a matter of the amount of space that one format has over another. That's a gross simplification between the two formats. You see, HD DVD was built upon... not just the technology of DVD, but the programming software and other aspects. When we began talking about the cost issues - Alan stated it's very very complex, but that the replication facilities that have been built for the mass production of DVD - it's much cheaper and simpler to convert for HD DVD mass production.
For those of us consuming these products - it's easy to simply believe decisions are made due to just advertising incentives, but when you speak to the technology guys inside these studios - you hear that HD DVD is cheaper, serves the technological needs of the High Definition format, that the programming languages are an extension of the established DVD format - so it is easier for them to work with. This decision is about more than an intial Toshiba advertising incentive - the decision was made at a tech level, an economic level and about a cost delivery level to the public. Paramount made this decision from the tech guys up. Here's the release...
Oh, I read the quote that's why I said he may or may not be a BD-Supporter. I just thought it was funny how he was congratulated on expressing his displeasure by some of his fans, then then the thread is killed.jjasper said:Here is the acutal quote:
Rabid Wolverine said:
Laurent said:Alright, let me quote you again...
Nowhere did you imply that he could be getting money to shut up. Maybe it was obvious that you were insinuating this, but I didn't read it as obvious as you seem to state it... I read that "moneyhats were exchanged between Paramount and HD-DVD God" and not between him and Paramount, otherwise he would have known that...
Assuming there's no clause in this contract that might allow them out before that, like if HDDVD has to maintain a certain minimum marketshare or something like that. In which case, it could be less than 18 months.VanMardigan said:18 months is the minimum amount of time to see Transformers, Shrek, and the rest of the titles involved.
Levy went on emphasize that beyond 'Close Encounters,' Spielberg has no other films in the high-def pipeline on either format. "At this moment, there are no plans for something further [on either format]. Anything in the future will be decided on a title-by-title basis. There certainly won't be more titles in 2007."
Oni Jazar said:Aw man! I've actually been thinking about A.I. and would love to have that in HD.
Speaking of Bay... anyone else think that his account could have been hacked? That line about FU to Transformers 2 seemed really odd - (maybe he's just an odd guy).
Oni Jazar said:Aw man! I've actually been thinking about A.I. and would love to have that in HD.
Speaking of Bay... anyone else think that his account could have been hacked? That line about FU to Transformers 2 seemed really odd - (maybe he's just an odd guy).
He NEVER said FU... Here:Oni Jazar said:Aw man! I've actually been thinking about A.I. and would love to have that in HD.
Speaking of Bay... anyone else think that his account could have been hacked? That line about FU to Transformers 2 seemed really odd - (maybe he's just an odd guy).
He said "pisses me off" and "sucks" which I would rate E for Everyone! :lolMichael Bay said:Paramount pisses me off! I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For them to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks! They were progressive by having two formats. No Transformers 2 for me!
I spoke to Michael a few minutes ago.
He said he just wants people to know that we should be able to view his movies in the format of our choice. Period.
Nothing more, nothing less.
_________________
> nelson /michaelbay.com admin /
Laurent said:He NEVER said FU... Here:
He said "pisses me off" and "sucks" which I would rate E for Everyone! :lol
ManaByte said:
ManaByte said:
jjasper said:Well there is a little more, the whole not wanting to do Transformers 2 now because of this.
ManaByte said:no, that post was deleted.
jjasper said:Yeah I know. This post was just to say he didn't have a preference in the format wars. What it doesn't address was his knee jerk reaction about not wanting to do the sequel now.
jjasper said:Yeah I know. This post was just to say he didn't have a preference in the format wars. What it doesn't address was his knee jerk reaction about not wanting to do the sequel now.