Zombie James
Banned
My five free Blu-ray movies arrived today and I got everything I requested. Only one dud.. maybe two. But i'm happy with my top three (Curse of the Black Pearl, Superman: The Movie, and American Psycho).
Killthee said:
Mifune said:Any word on the quality of Master and Commander's transfer?
I really don't want to buy it again since I already have the multidisc collector's DVD set (and what a set it is), but it IS one of the best movies of the last five years and beautiful to boot, so...
A Sony rep cited internal research suggesting that over 80% of all PlayStation 3 owners had watched at least one Blu-ray movie on their systems. It was also revealed that the Blu-ray profile 1.1 firmware update for the PS3 is expected to be made available for download later this month.
Some new information as to high-def title plans for 2008 - all Blu-ray due to the other camp taking a pass - was offered at the event as well, during a studio panel late in the day. First, Sony revealed that Kevin Smith's Dogma is due to arrive on Blu-ray on 2/12, with Run Lola Run following on 2/19. In addition to the release of Resident Evil: Extinction on 1/1, Sony will street a Resident Evil: The High-Definition Trilogy set on Blu-ray the same day. The Guns of Navarone and A Passage to India are apparently on the way in early 2008, with Bridge on the River Kwai and Lawrence of Arabia expected to follow later in the year. Sony also hinted that they're going to experiment with more advanced BD-Java features in 2008. Further down the line, Disney, Fox, Sony and Lionsgate all confirmed that they're going to be expanding their Blu-ray release slate in 2008. Fox revealed that new theatrical titles like Juno, ******, Horton Hears a Who and Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium will all be released, as well as many new catalog titles. Lionsgate expects to deliver Saw IV in January, while Disney confirmed that Finding Nemo and The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe will both feature PiP video.
VanMardigan said:My guess is people new to the HD DVD fold. Perhaps folks who got the standalones on sale. Unless there was a sale I didn't know about.
Washington, D.C. (December 5, 2007) -- Despite calls for a single format, two research companies yesterday said both Blu-ray and HD DVD high-def discs will be around for years to come.
That's according to an article by Video Business.
At an industry conference in Los Angeles, Screen Media Digest and Adams Media Research also said that both formats will sell roughly the same number of discs over the next several years.
Blu-ray, which is backed exclusively by four major Hollywood studios, has outsold HD DVD by a 2-1 margin to date. (HD DVD has the exclusive backing of two major studios.)
"Both formats will be established and co-exist for the foreseeable future, said Screen Digest's Helen Davis Jayalath, according to Video Business. By 2012, U.S. high-def software will be evenly split between the two formats, where Blu-ray represents 55 percent of the market and HD DVD represents 45 percent."
Adams Media Research said Blu-ray and HD DVD disc revenues will both be around $5 billion by 2012, compared to $10 billion for standard DVDs.
The companies said that the standard-def DVD is the biggest obstacle facing the high-def disc industry. Turned off the format war, many consumers may instead buy 'upconverting' DVD players that will improve the image on standard-def DVDs.
The research companies said the format war will diminish the potential of revenue from high-def disc sales, Video Business reported.
Sales of both formats have been below analyst expectations, said Jayalath. You would think that (large demand) for high-def TVs would help adoption more.
Elios83 said:PS3 will get updated to support BD Profile 1.1 later this month:
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/#blog20
Gary Whitta said:
The research companies said the format war will diminish the potential of revenue from high-def disc sales, Video Business reported.
VanMardigan said:I think Toshiba paid for Batman and Matrix. What boggles my mind is why they didn't lock down 300 as well. It's not like the Blu Ray had matching features, so they could've used the same excuse.
Jeez kids, and you are calling out others to be fanboys?Kabuki Waq said:so let me get this straight
No MATRIX
No Batman Begins
No TRansfromers
and yet Blu Ray still winning ?
i can see why HD DVD adopters might be a little bit bitter/worried
JB1981 said:i cannot believe how bad SM3 was - just watched it
painful fart said:Jeez kids, and you are calling out others to be fanboys?
Well, what is your conclusion from my quote, Einstein?Kabuki Waq said:so am I an HD DVD fanboy because i prefer HD DVD software? or am I BLu Ray fanboy because i own a ps3 ?
birdman said:I was wondering, have they planned Ghostbusters for release on Bluray yet?
YYZ said:When is BD getting the PiP thing like the director's thing in 300?
DarkJediKnight said:Yup. Sam Raimi dropped the ball big time. This could've been great trilogy, but S3 really sucked. Too much singing and dancing, and not enough Venom. There had better be a director's cut that gets rid of all the bullshit and adds more venom.
Gary Whitta said:I still don't get why anybody would want Swordfish in any format even if it was free.
Gary Whitta said:I still don't get why anybody would want Swordfish in any format even if it was free.
DarkJediKnight said:Yup. Sam Raimi dropped the ball big time. This could've been great trilogy, but S3 really sucked. Too much singing and dancing, and not enough Venom. There had better be a director's cut that gets rid of all the bullshit and adds more venom.
see, a director's cut would do the exact opposite since Sam Raimi wanted Sandman and Vulture, not Venom.DarkJediKnight said:Yup. Sam Raimi dropped the ball big time. This could've been great trilogy, but S3 really sucked. Too much singing and dancing, and not enough Venom. There had better be a director's cut that gets rid of all the bullshit and adds more venom.
...it's always fun when a new kid comes to town.painful fart said:Well, what is your conclusion from my quote, Einstein?
You listed a number of HD-DVD exclusives, completely ignoring that there are lists of BD exclusive blockbusters that would point in the other direction. And if you look at exclusives of recent blockbuster hits, maybe the future of HD-DVD doesn´t look so rosy, eh?
Gary Whitta said:I still don't get why anybody would want Swordfish in any format even if it was free.
theBishop said:I can think of two reasons...
dallow_bg said:Here's the list of the new Warner titles on sale at Amazon.
The box sets are $56.
So that's 8 movies for $56.
Sell the ones you don't like.
-------------------
300
16 Blocks
Alexander, Revisited - The Final Cut
Battle of the Bulge
Blood Diamond
Christmas Story, A
Deliverance
Departed, The
Dirty Dozen, The
Enter the Dragon
Fountain, The
Fugitive, The
Full Metal Jacket (crappy version)
Good Night, and Good Luck
GoodFellas
Happy Feet
House of Wax
Last Samurai, The
Lethal Weapon 2
Letters from Iwo Jima
March of the Penguins
Music and Lyrics
National Geographic - Relentless Enemies
National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Phantom of the Opera, The
Rio Bravo
Road Warrior, The
Scanner Darkly, A
Searchers, The
TMNT
Troy (Director's Cut)
Under Seige
Unforgiven
Viva Las Vegas
We Are Marshall
Wild Bunch, The
Wyatt Earp
Best of Blu-Ray Vol. 1
(Lethal Weapon / The Road Warrior / Swordfish / Training Day)
Best of Blu-Ray Vol. 2
(The Last Samurai / The Phantom of the Opera / Unforgiven / The Fugitive)
Cosmic Bus said:Is it correct to assume Warner is subsidising this sale the way Sony does? If so, why the hell are they snubbing HD owners (not that I've come to expect anything less with these endless BR sales)?
Gary Whitta said:Theoretical question:
Blu-ray is currently beating HD-DVD even though the BD hardware is more expensive than equivalent HD-DVD hardware. So...
If Sony (or Samsung or whoever) came out with a $199 BD player tomorrow, would that be enough to put us into an endgame scenario?
Gary Whitta said:Theoretical question:
Blu-ray is currently beating HD-DVD even though the BD hardware is more expensive than equivalent HD-DVD hardware. So...
If Sony (or Samsung or whoever) came out with a $199 BD player tomorrow, would that be enough to put us into an endgame scenario?
Thanks, Old Master of the Trade.bune duggy said:...it's always fun when a new kid comes to town.
painful fart said:Well, what is your conclusion from my quote, Einstein?
You listed a number of HD-DVD exclusives, completely ignoring that there are lists of BD exclusive blockbusters that would point in the other direction. And if you look at exclusives of recent blockbuster hits, maybe the future of HD-DVD doesn´t look so rosy, eh?
painful fart said:Do you know if the exclusivity deal between Paramount an Toshiba for the US market has an expire date? Is it a subscription deal Toshiba can renew once a year or what?
Gary Whitta said:Theoretical question:
Blu-ray is currently beating HD-DVD even though the BD hardware is more expensive than equivalent HD-DVD hardware. So...
If Sony (or Samsung or whoever) came out with a $199 BD player tomorrow, would that be enough to put us into an endgame scenario?
Not likely. We're still in an early adopter phase for these formats and would be for at least another year or more and that's being optimistic by assuming a growth rate akin to DVD, in spite of a format war.Gary Whitta said:If Sony (or Samsung or whoever) came out with a $199 BD player tomorrow, would that be enough to put us into an endgame scenario?
kaching said:No, the endgame is $199 dual format players in another year or so, when neutral CE manufacturers will downplay format distinction and just emphasize the HD movie playback. Studios will probably jump on board and subdue the packaging distinction between movie releases of differen formats. "Plays great on dual format HD players" or some such will become the tagline.