It's the same position as Biden, or even an Anthony Kennedy: personally opposed due to religion, but not going to codify that opposition into law.
It's definitely a Catholic thing, right?
It's the same position as Biden, or even an Anthony Kennedy: personally opposed due to religion, but not going to codify that opposition into law.
Let's quit bickering and start asking the really important questions: Like how, after months of "Bernie" and "Hillary", are we expected to start referring to a candidate by their last name? Is the campaign going to go with first name/last name mish mash of "Hillary/Kaine 2016" or is there a better solution?
It's definitely a Catholic thing, right?
How does an anti-abortion politician get a good rating from planned parenthood?
Everybody who wants things to get worse in order to spurn something better has forgotten the damage that the Bush presidency wrought. See-sawing between disastrous Republican administrations and the Democrats tasked with cleaning up their messes is no way to live.
100% democratic turnout in all local elections nationwide would be worth a trump presidency imo.
obviously people should vote hilary if they believe in what she stands for, though.
It's definitely a Catholic thing, right?
Those who would need to be motivated to engage and vote.worse for whom?
What the fuck are you even talking about. Having the supreme Court be conservative would damage the u.s. for generations. We're talking looking 20+ years here. It would be devastating to minorities, woman rights, and a host of other shit that cannot be undone easily. Just zero awareness of what actually matters. So fucking easy to say this when you have no skin in the game.100% democratic turnout in all local elections nationwide would be worth a trump presidency imo.
obviously people should vote hilary if they believe in what she stands for, though.
How does an anti-abortion politician get a good rating from planned parenthood?
How does an anti-abortion politician get a good rating from planned parenthood?
The right way to do this is through education and access to health care and contraception rather than by restricting and criminalizing women's reproductive decisions. For that reason, I oppose efforts to weaken Roe v. Wade.
Is this including once Trump wins Cali and NY?Fiddling with the NY times interactive, let's assume Hillary gets Virginia because of Kaine.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
If Hillary then wins Florida OR PA OR Ohio, she wins the election, period. Trump can win every other swing state and will still lose, including winning states like Nevada and New Hampshire.
How does an anti-abortion politician get a good rating from planned parenthood?
Preview of the VP debate w/ Mike Pence?
Tim Kaine = anagram for Anti-Mike
For what it's worth, I think a national repudiation of Trump's rhetoric in terms of popular vote would be healthy for the country, independent of what his EV numbers are.
Whether we see it or not is another matter, but I can see merit in wanting to add your voice to the mix. It's only one, but it's yours.
(And, fair's fair, I could also see a national acceptance of Trump's rhetoric in terms of popular vote would also have an effect on the country)
Is this including once Trump wins Cali and NY?
Shouldn't take too long lolI'm voting for Hillary unless she does something really stupid this election.
How does an anti-abortion politician get a good rating from planned parenthood?
Wow lol
Pew showed Catholic Republicans aren't happy with Trump. Could help picking a few away in places like Ohio and PA suburbs.
This is a good pick
My wife told me the other week the priest at her Catholic church had a homily that was basically anti-trump.
What does this have to do with SCOTUS? So just fuck basic human rights so that dems will come out and vote more?100% democratic turnout in all local elections nationwide would be worth a trump presidency imo.
obviously people should vote hilary if they believe in what she stands for, though.
How does an anti-abortion politician get a good rating from planned parenthood?
Strongly against animal rights?
The fuck did animals ever do to you Tim Kaine
Preview of the VP debate w/ Mike Pence?
Tim Kaine = anagram for Anti-Mike
In short he would rather they have the right to do it, and try to convince them not to, as opposed to take away their right to do it.
I think it's pretty clear to Catholics everywhere which way the Pope would vote, at the very least.
Not quite? Clinton getting both VA and PA (or both VA and OH) would mean Trump could win if he gets all the other states included in that interactive forecast. VA and PA would result in a tie.Fiddling with the NY times interactive, let's assume Hillary gets Virginia because of Kaine.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
If Hillary then wins Florida OR PA OR Ohio, she wins the election, period. Trump can win every other swing state and will still lose, including winning states like Nevada and New Hampshire.
Haha no, Milli Vanilli was accused of lip synch faking. Vanilla Ice was the one accused of plagiarism. (Well maybe Milli Vanilli was plagiarising too, IDK)Did you mean Milli Vanilli
lol, SMH
My guess is that they're only counting swing states? Trump getting "all the other states included" seems unlikely?Not quite? Clinton getting both VA and PA (or both VA and OH) would mean Trump could win if he gets all the other states included in that interactive forecast.
"Protecting the country" can mean very different things to different people. Ditto "doing what's right." That's why we are where we are, for any number of social issues.Yeah, I mean, I'm sympathetic to people who don't like getting yelled at, but seriously grow up. If people yelling at you causes you not to stand up for what is right, then you are not a particularly strongly principled person and you should be told that. So I think we should be kinder and nicer to people because that is the right thing to do but I am not particularly fond of seeing this argument. And I've seen plenty of arguing over the last year! People do not really bend and change their minds easily if at all, so people are sure to catch feelings!
Either you care about protecting the country or you don't...hopefully you won't be deterred from this because people were mean to you on the internet.
Not quite? Clinton getting both VA and PA (or both VA and OH) would mean Trump could win if he gets all the other states included in that interactive forecast. VA and PA would result in a tie.
PP is pro-choice, not pro-abortion. Kaine correctly thinks the choice to abort or carry to term is the woman's, not his or the government's. PP doesn't care if you don't want to have an abortion. They do object when "pro-lifers" interfere in the care they provide to their patients. Ergo, they don't have a problem with politicians as long as politicians stay out of the decision.
I can see why it is boring for most here, but seems to me like Hilary needs to do a better job appealing to the older white vote that Trump is doing well with.
I was a Bernie supporter and I'll be voting for Stein for president because I'd like to see the Democrats move further left (or better yet a change in the election system to allow third parties a real chance), but that's only because I live in Texas where my vote will not change the actual outcome. If I was in a battleground state I'd definitely be voting for Clinton, and watching Trump's speech last night only solidified that.
If you're in a battleground state and you aren't voting for Clinton I wonder if it's partially because you feel like your life wouldn't be directly harmed by a Trump presidency. I'm an educated straight white man with solid work experience, I feel like I'd be able to survive four years of Trump (unless he started WW3 or something). I also feel like this is a position of privilege. The stakes are much higher if you're part of the groups Trump has targeted as the enemy. Being a minority in Trump's America sounds fucking awful.
Watching that speech last night felt like watching the birth of fascism. If it was a Romney or a Bush I'd be a little more sympathetic towards the "vote your conscience" crowd, but Trump is just too fucking dangerous. Suck it up battlegrounders, vote Hillary, look for progressive options down ticket.
I agree with you but I think you should vote Hillary too and contribute to the purpling of Texas. Just IMOI was a Bernie supporter and I'll be voting for Stein for president because I'd like to see the Democrats move further left (or better yet a change in the election system to allow third parties a real chance), but that's only because I live in Texas where my vote will not change the actual outcome. If I was in a battleground state I'd definitely be voting for Clinton, and watching Trump's speech last night only solidified that.
If you're in a battleground state and you aren't voting for Clinton I wonder if it's partially because you feel like your life wouldn't be directly harmed by a Trump presidency. I'm an educated straight white man with solid work experience, I feel like I'd be able to survive four years of Trump (unless he started WW3 or something). I also feel like this is a position of privilege. The stakes are much higher if you're part of the groups Trump has targeted as the enemy. Being a minority in Trump's America sounds fucking awful.
Watching that speech last night felt like watching the birth of fascism. If it was a Romney or a Bush I'd be a little more sympathetic towards the "vote your conscience" crowd, but Trump is just too fucking dangerous. Suck it up battlegrounders, vote Hillary, look for progressive options down ticket.
That's going to be hard, as many are set in their ways, and well, you have the old specter of racism/xenophobia at play.
I agree with you but I think you should vote Hillary too and contribute to the purpling of Texas. Just IMO