• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Hillary Clinton Selects Tim Kaine As VP

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's quit bickering and start asking the really important questions: Like how, after months of "Bernie" and "Hillary", are we expected to start referring to a candidate by their last name? Is the campaign going to go with first name/last name mish mash of "Hillary/Kaine 2016" or is there a better solution?

Clinton/Kaine. I get why it was Hillary in the primary, but Hillary/Kaine would be weird.

And yes, I thought about this all week.

It's definitely a Catholic thing, right?

Yes. And I respect that.
 

luxarific

Nork unification denier
How does an anti-abortion politician get a good rating from planned parenthood?

PP is pro-choice, not pro-abortion. Kaine correctly thinks the choice to abort or carry to term is the woman's, not his or the government's. PP doesn't care if you don't want to have an abortion. They do object when "pro-lifers" interfere in the care they provide to their patients. Ergo, they don't have a problem with politicians as long as politicians stay out of the decision.
 
Everybody who wants things to get worse in order to spurn something better has forgotten the damage that the Bush presidency wrought. See-sawing between disastrous Republican administrations and the Democrats tasked with cleaning up their messes is no way to live.

worse for whom?
 

mclem

Member
100% democratic turnout in all local elections nationwide would be worth a trump presidency imo.

obviously people should vote hilary if they believe in what she stands for, though.

100% democratic turnout in all local elections doesn't keep gay marriage legal in Texas.
 

TheFatOne

Member
100% democratic turnout in all local elections nationwide would be worth a trump presidency imo.

obviously people should vote hilary if they believe in what she stands for, though.
What the fuck are you even talking about. Having the supreme Court be conservative would damage the u.s. for generations. We're talking looking 20+ years here. It would be devastating to minorities, woman rights, and a host of other shit that cannot be undone easily. Just zero awareness of what actually matters. So fucking easy to say this when you have no skin in the game.
 
Pew showed Catholic Republicans aren't happy with Trump. Could help picking a few away in places like Ohio and PA suburbs.

This is a good pick
 

pigeon

Banned
CoAz8Y-VMAA8nIE.jpg

Fucking gold.
 
For what it's worth, I think a national repudiation of Trump's rhetoric in terms of popular vote would be healthy for the country, independent of what his EV numbers are.

Whether we see it or not is another matter, but I can see merit in wanting to add your voice to the mix. It's only one, but it's yours.

(And, fair's fair, I could also see a national acceptance of Trump's rhetoric in terms of popular vote would also have an effect on the country)

That is also a valid, rational perspective which I can respect, sure. But
 

Random17

Member
Is this including once Trump wins Cali and NY?

lol

I'm assuming you are being sarcastic.

Anyway, if Trump wins NY or Cali he would have won the swing states anyway, so the point is moot. NY and Cali aren't exactly known for large numbers of blue collar white people disgruntled with globalisation. I can see Trump winning Ohio or PA, maybe even make inroads in Michigan in poorer scenarios for Clinton, but Clinton will probably do well on the coasts.
 

xxracerxx

Don't worry, I'll vouch for them.
100% democratic turnout in all local elections nationwide would be worth a trump presidency imo.

obviously people should vote hilary if they believe in what she stands for, though.
What does this have to do with SCOTUS? So just fuck basic human rights so that dems will come out and vote more?

I assume you are a white male just from what I am reading here.
 

Alucrid

Banned
In short he would rather they have the right to do it, and try to convince them not to, as opposed to take away their right to do it.

it doesn't sound like he wants to "convince them not to". sounds like he wants to prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place.
 
Fiddling with the NY times interactive, let's assume Hillary gets Virginia because of Kaine.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html

If Hillary then wins Florida OR PA OR Ohio, she wins the election, period. Trump can win every other swing state and will still lose, including winning states like Nevada and New Hampshire.
Not quite? Clinton getting both VA and PA (or both VA and OH) would mean Trump could win if he gets all the other states included in that interactive forecast. VA and PA would result in a tie.
 

Morrigan Stark

Arrogant Smirk
Did you mean Milli Vanilli
Haha no, Milli Vanilli was accused of lip synch faking. Vanilla Ice was the one accused of plagiarism. (Well maybe Milli Vanilli was plagiarising too, IDK)

lol, SMH

Not quite? Clinton getting both VA and PA (or both VA and OH) would mean Trump could win if he gets all the other states included in that interactive forecast.
My guess is that they're only counting swing states? Trump getting "all the other states included" seems unlikely?
 

bachikarn

Member
I can see why it is boring for most here, but seems to me like Hilary needs to do a better job appealing to the older white vote that Trump is doing well with.
 

Knox

Member
I was a Bernie supporter and I'll be voting for Stein for president because I'd like to see the Democrats move further left (or better yet a change in the election system to allow third parties a real chance), but that's only because I live in Texas where my vote will not change the actual outcome. If I was in a battleground state I'd definitely be voting for Clinton, and watching Trump's speech last night only solidified that.

If you're in a battleground state and you aren't voting for Clinton I wonder if it's partially because you feel like your life wouldn't be directly harmed by a Trump presidency. I'm an educated straight white man with solid work experience, I feel like I'd be able to survive four years of Trump (unless he started WW3 or something). I also feel like this is a position of privilege. The stakes are much higher if you're part of the groups Trump has targeted as the enemy. Being a minority in Trump's America sounds fucking awful.

Watching that speech last night felt like watching the birth of fascism. If it was a Romney or a Bush I'd be a little more sympathetic towards the "vote your conscience" crowd, but Trump is just too fucking dangerous. Suck it up battlegrounders, vote Hillary, look for progressive options down ticket.
 

Phased

Member
You can personally disagree with abortions without impeding on other people's right to have them and decide what's best for themselves.

Abortion is a very very personal subject that you're allowed to feel any way you want on. What you cannot do is force your view onto other people through legislation which is why Kaine ranks high among Planned Parenthood.

Despite feeling the way he does he clearly recognizes that forcing his beliefs onto other people is wrong. I believe Biden said the same thing in the VP debates.
 

Red

Member
Yeah, I mean, I'm sympathetic to people who don't like getting yelled at, but seriously grow up. If people yelling at you causes you not to stand up for what is right, then you are not a particularly strongly principled person and you should be told that. So I think we should be kinder and nicer to people because that is the right thing to do but I am not particularly fond of seeing this argument. And I've seen plenty of arguing over the last year! People do not really bend and change their minds easily if at all, so people are sure to catch feelings!

Either you care about protecting the country or you don't...hopefully you won't be deterred from this because people were mean to you on the internet.
"Protecting the country" can mean very different things to different people. Ditto "doing what's right." That's why we are where we are, for any number of social issues.
 

Sianos

Member
The people who can be pushed to the right just because liberal randos on the internet were mean to them were never liberals. They may have voted for liberal policies, but they are quick to hold social progress hostage and are the same people who will magically somehow become social conservatives as soon as they hit middle age - because they never cared in the first place. Doesn't mean we shouldn't try and keep them on our side for as long as we could, but they are still unprincipled people and I think that should be recognized.

PP is pro-choice, not pro-abortion. Kaine correctly thinks the choice to abort or carry to term is the woman's, not his or the government's. PP doesn't care if you don't want to have an abortion. They do object when "pro-lifers" interfere in the care they provide to their patients. Ergo, they don't have a problem with politicians as long as politicians stay out of the decision.

Exactly, very well said.
 

taoofjord

Member
I have to say, Tim Kaine has like... one of the friendliest faces I've seen in politics. I know nothing about him, or whether he's really just a straight up jerk, but right now I'd like to pinch his cheek.

 
I can see why it is boring for most here, but seems to me like Hilary needs to do a better job appealing to the older white vote that Trump is doing well with.

That's going to be hard, as many are set in their ways, and well, you have the old specter of racism/xenophobia at play.
 

Nerokis

Member
Not an exciting pick, but a great one nonetheless. Tim Kaine has always seemed like a pretty good guy, I agree with him on most issues, he has an impressive resume, and he'll help secure a swing state that'll go a long way toward giving Hillary the presidency.

The thread about banking regulations was a depressing read. Common sense and a sense of perspective are in such short supply these days.
 

Josh7289

Member
I was a Bernie supporter and I'll be voting for Stein for president because I'd like to see the Democrats move further left (or better yet a change in the election system to allow third parties a real chance), but that's only because I live in Texas where my vote will not change the actual outcome. If I was in a battleground state I'd definitely be voting for Clinton, and watching Trump's speech last night only solidified that.

If you're in a battleground state and you aren't voting for Clinton I wonder if it's partially because you feel like your life wouldn't be directly harmed by a Trump presidency. I'm an educated straight white man with solid work experience, I feel like I'd be able to survive four years of Trump (unless he started WW3 or something). I also feel like this is a position of privilege. The stakes are much higher if you're part of the groups Trump has targeted as the enemy. Being a minority in Trump's America sounds fucking awful.

Watching that speech last night felt like watching the birth of fascism. If it was a Romney or a Bush I'd be a little more sympathetic towards the "vote your conscience" crowd, but Trump is just too fucking dangerous. Suck it up battlegrounders, vote Hillary, look for progressive options down ticket.

Thank you. I agree.
 

Morrigan Stark

Arrogant Smirk
I was a Bernie supporter and I'll be voting for Stein for president because I'd like to see the Democrats move further left (or better yet a change in the election system to allow third parties a real chance), but that's only because I live in Texas where my vote will not change the actual outcome. If I was in a battleground state I'd definitely be voting for Clinton, and watching Trump's speech last night only solidified that.

If you're in a battleground state and you aren't voting for Clinton I wonder if it's partially because you feel like your life wouldn't be directly harmed by a Trump presidency. I'm an educated straight white man with solid work experience, I feel like I'd be able to survive four years of Trump (unless he started WW3 or something). I also feel like this is a position of privilege. The stakes are much higher if you're part of the groups Trump has targeted as the enemy. Being a minority in Trump's America sounds fucking awful.

Watching that speech last night felt like watching the birth of fascism. If it was a Romney or a Bush I'd be a little more sympathetic towards the "vote your conscience" crowd, but Trump is just too fucking dangerous. Suck it up battlegrounders, vote Hillary, look for progressive options down ticket.
I agree with you but I think you should vote Hillary too and contribute to the purpling of Texas. Just IMO :)
 

FTF

Member
A good/fine, though boring/safe, choice. But whatever it takes to beat Trump, and by a comfortable margin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom