The secret is to play in first person mode. The difference in response and accuracy is light and day. First person mode, field of view max = perfect western immersive sim.
Its the most predictable story ever made. Doubly so with rdr1 starting where it left. Open world is great but not the best. Play some good games guy.
No worries mate. Good on you that you were able to enjoy below standard gameplay. Says nothing about it being good objectively speaking.
I don't like fighers, yet I don't call them bad games.
...with VR mod.The secret is to play in first person mode. The difference in response and accuracy is light and day. First person mode, field of view max = perfect western immersive sim.
Elden ring. Both Zelda games. EzBest open world in any game ever.
Name a better one.
We'll be waiting, forever.
Nah. ER's high points are the set dungeons and Zelda is like a theme park. RDR2 seems like an actual world.Elden ring. Both Zelda games. Ez
Nope. In every way elden winsNah. ER's high points are the set dungeons and Zelda is like a theme park. RDR2 seems like an actual world.
No.Nope. In every way elden wins
Realism isn't worth shit in games. Rdr2 is just a good looking diorama. Elden ring is fun to play
True Crime: New York CityBest open world in any game ever.
Name a better one.
We'll be waiting, forever.
True Crime: New York City
Bully: Scholarship Edition
Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag
Days Gone
Hogwarts Legacy
*All of these have more interactivity.
If by interactivity you mean you can kill anything that moves I guess so. Otherwise no.HOGWARTS FUCKING LEGACY
![]()
The first Red Dead Redemption has better interaction than all those games.
Defining if something is good is technical.What is objectively good when it's a matter of taste?
Defining if something is good is technical.
Defining something is fun is based on entertainment value.
So then why isn't the gameplay good of RDR2 if it works technically speaking?
Dated, slow and clunky.
Does that mean you cannot enjoy it?
No.
It's not that he's slow, it's that the input takes a long time to register, like this:
I don't know if it's smoother on PC but it was awful on the PS4
So be it. Agree to disagree. I see your view and I see my mistake of the phrasing. Doesn't change my view on seperating entertaining/joy from good/bad, however.Okay, i guess we see it differently.. If i was to write about a game i didn't enjoy it's gameplay, i would say that it's my opinion, stating that RDR2 gameplay isn't good as a fact, or how you phrased it "until people finally understand" is just wrong, you may see in this topic along and on countless other topics that many pepole did enjoy the gameplay, so it's far from being below standard.
Elden ring. Both Zelda games. Ez
Both games being fantastic on their own rights.Elden ring. Both Zelda games. Ez
Its one of the best games on PC not made by a kid in his room.
I was too busy playing Gwent to fully explore the open world for the short time I played it. I do love the scenery in the Blood and Wine DLC though. Absolutely breathtaking.Why is noone saying Witcher 3?![]()
Oh, come on. If you think ‘interactivity’ in Red Dead Redemption boils down to ‘killing anything that moves,’ you’ve missed the whole point. I’m talking about a living, breathing world where the smallest actions have real consequences. When was the last time you walked through Valentine and got into a fight with a random drunk, only to have the law after you and the whole town remember it the next time you show up? Or helped a stranded stranger and found out days later he survived because of you? Red Dead doesn't treat the world like a theme park; it's an ecosystem where interaction feels meaningful, not just hollow ‘go here, collect this’ quests like some Hogwarts chores. But sure, if that’s too complex to grasp, then by all means, reduce it to just ‘shooting things.If by interactivity you mean you can kill anything that moves I guess so. Otherwise no.