I just upgraded to ps4 pro because of this game. Looks amazing. Great year for games.
I'll be doing the same in two weeks. Still looking for a good tv
I'm thinking about getting a Pro too. Damn.

I just upgraded to ps4 pro because of this game. Looks amazing. Great year for games.
I'll be doing the same in two weeks. Still looking for a good tv
I'm thinking about getting a Pro too. Damn.
Here's a description of one
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2017...awn-made-me-crazy-with-anticipation-for-more/
It may be time.It's inevitable if not for this it'll be for Gt sport or Ni no kuni or god of war or kh3 so on. Might as well crack now with this beauty to get it started
Stop! No more temptation!I already have it! Glorious machinery that will flex its muscles with Horizon.
lolYou know, Aloy, we really are all the games.
![]()
Just give in. Play Horizon at its best.It may be time.
Stop! No more temptation!
lol
keikaku.jpg
It may be time.
Stop! No more temptation!
i admit this is the first time i've ever entertained notions of getting a pro
People still going here trying to downplay this game?
It's going to be amazing either you can accept it or not.
i admit this is the first time i've ever entertained notions of getting a pro
- Bow combat
- Weapon skill trees
- Environment collectibles (plants)
- Beasts that can be tamed and ridden
- Towers the reveal more of the game world map
- Stealth
- 'Focus' mode revealing target locations in the view
- Weather
- In game help/tutorials and lore accessible through game menus
- In game cut scenes
- Mission objectives shown in game on the HUD
Considering it is from Guerrilla of all developers, I would remain skeptical.
Concerned people know what they're doing, man. The jig has been up.People ALWAYS forget, that the boards in TW3 are basically towers. And in TW3 you also free villages from monsters and destroy tons of monster nests.
What makes people not compare it to TW3 is simply the look of the game. Horizon has a somewhat similar color palette with FC Primal, and the menus are kinda alike. But that's it.
I have a problem with these Ubisoft comparisons, simply because it comes with a negative connotation.
One ridiculously over-hyped shooter that laid a really solid foundation for sequelsConsidering it is from Guerrilla of all developers, I would remain skeptical.
more like rpg elements
I'll be doing the same in two weeks. Still looking for a good tv
I'm thinking about getting a Pro too. Damn.
It's inevitable if not for this it'll be for Gt sport or Ni no kuni or god of war or kh3 so on. Might as well crack now with this beauty to get it started
Traded in my launch PS4 with a bunch of games. Could have traded in more things like my wii U and vita lol i could have paid the whole thing off. Only payed 188 for the Pro. Game stop gives you extra 50 for trading in your current gen console x1 or ps4. I dont think that was bad.$275...It really is tempting. Doesn't seem to be any bundles coming for horizon (was hoping for a special one but guess it's too early for special pros)
70+91+84+73/4=79.5/ round it to get rid of the decimal 80 meta average.Considering it is from Guerrilla of all developers, I would remain skeptical.
It is a valid reason, they have not once produced a great game.Not this shit again.
One ridiculously over-hyped shooter that laid a really solid foundation for sequels
Two really good shooters
One weak launch title (that was still kind of fun)
70+91+84+73/4=79.5/ round it to get rid of the decimal 80 meta average.
Shadow fall alone topped 2.1 mil back in 2014
Series wasn't some juggernaut no but stop this shit seriously
I would actually disagree, because that's a feature that could sell people on the game. Giant robot-to-robot battles would put this game on a different level, so I hope you are right.
Considering it is from Guerrilla of all developers, I would remain skeptical.
Source of this gif? Link full fight?Love it
![]()
Ps3 GG was a beast, Killzone 2 Metacritic is 91.
I don't think it aged well at all. I think the reason it was praised for its time was for its graphics and its multiplayer. Someone who would play it today, will likely not consider it as good as someone who did when it launched.
I don't think it aged well at all. I think the reason it was praised for its time was for its graphics and its multiplayer. Someone who would play it today, will likely not consider it as good as someone who did when it launched.
Horizon is clearly copying everything.
Needs a ubisoft logo and a "don't forget GG made this"yeah, at this point they should even change the boxart to something like this
Considering it is from Guerrilla of all developers, I would remain skeptical.
lolyeah, at this point they should even change the boxart to something like this
![]()
Yeah, it was pointed out.Anyone noticed that alloy has no interaction with the vegetation and her clothes don't get wet after she comes in contact with water?
If you are going to respond, use more than a picture calling me a troll. Just because I have an opinion you do not like does not mean that you have the right to call me a troll.
You forgot the single player A.I. was great, the enemy A.I. was awesome.
They made some great games, and based on everything we know horizon looks like a safe bet to deliver.
Cool. I think I'll believe all of the positive previews for horizon and the 91 metascore and my 70 hours played on KZ2 over expert GAFfer WaffleTaco.If you are going to respond, use more than a picture calling me a troll. Just because I have an opinion you do not like does not mean that you have the right to call me a troll.
I really did not see anything special about it to be honest.
If you are going to respond, use more than a picture calling me a troll. Just because I have an opinion you do not like does not mean that you have the right to call me a troll.
I really did not see anything special about it to be honest.
Anyone noticed that alloy has no interaction with the vegetation and her clothes don't get wet after she comes in contact with water?
My personal opinion absolutely should matter, after all I specifically said "I".Your personal opinion shouldn't matter. The question is whether they have made a "great game". Critically speaking, yes, they have.
Cool. I think I'll believe all of the positive previews for horizon and the 91 metascore and my 70 hours played on KZ2 over expert GAFfer WaffleTaco.
Opinions and all but saying definitive stuff like "GG has never made a good game" when the only semi quantifiable measure we have for determining game quality so obviously counters your statement is a bit foolish.
The Flanking, how they take cover, be it hard cover or soft cover they would adjust their bodies to conceal themselves. How they attacked varied as well and they did it based on your position and they type of ammo you were deploying.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oWKCLdsGTE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBN46XUpdaQ
The Flanking, how they take cover, be it hard cover or soft cover they would adjust their bodies to conceal themselves. How they attacked varied as well and they did it based on your position and they type of ammo you were deploying.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oWKCLdsGTE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBN46XUpdaQ
don't make me a definitive statement than try and pull the it's my opinion card(next you'll say do I have to put imo in front of every post)
Anyone noticed that alloy has no interaction with the vegetation and her clothes don't get wet after she comes in contact with water?
yeah, at this point they should even change the boxart to something like this
![]()
she definitely interacts with the tall grass, her skin gets wet but the clothes dontAnyone noticed that alloy has no interaction with the vegetation and her clothes don't get wet after she comes in contact with water?
Again, I'll trust what previews say then what you say, which detail quests,m variety and characters, all a lot of praise I might add. Average to good gameplay? What open world game have better looking gameplay? People who played it for 4 hours said the open world was the star of the show.If you are going to respond, use more than a picture calling me a troll. Just because I have an opinion you do not like does not mean that you have the right to call me a troll.
I really did not see anything special about it to be honest.
I disagree. I think it will have great graphics definitely, as it looks amazing. I think it could have average to good gameplay, and good sound. However I think it is okay to remain skeptical of the story, the open world, and the quests themselves along with the little things involved with the games lie towers and collectibles.
So it's confirmed that there will be no flying mounts and Thunderjaw is not mountable? Then the leaks from earlier were fake? Disappointed if true. Imagine fighting a Tallneck with a Thunderjaw.
Arrow launcher:
![]()
Poor man lol
- Bow combat
- Weapon skill trees
- Environment collectibles (plants)
- Beasts that can be tamed and ridden
- Towers the reveal more of the game world map
- Stealth
- 'Focus' mode revealing target locations in the view
- Weather
- In game help/tutorials and lore accessible through game menus
- In game cut scenes
- Mission objectives shown in game on the HUD
Just reserved my copy from Best Buy! After my GCU discount and a couple of certificates, the game will come out to around $25 for me!
yeah, at this point they should even change the boxart to something like this
![]()
Anyone noticed that alloy has no interaction with the vegetation and her clothes don't get wet after she comes in contact with water?
Again, I'll trust what previews say then what you say, which detail quests,m variety and characters, all a lot of praise I might add. Average to good gameplay? What open world game have better looking gameplay? People who played it for 4 hours said the open world was the star of the show.
My personal opinion absolutely should matter, after all I specifically said "I".
It is a valid reason, they have not once produced a great game.
That's awesome. Is there a video source for this?