Lunarorbit
Member
I really like the 3d worlds in Zelda but I prefer 2d.
No, just stop with this. It's arguably the best and much closer to the top than the bottom. Best pacing of all Zeldas, most touching story, and terrific worldbuilding and levels.Link's awakening is the worse 2d Zelda though. Just not worse than first Zelda, maybe.
I played the remake and found it to be a bit simplistic and dull. Incredible achievement in 1993 on a Game Boy, but every 2D Zelda that came after is better.No, just stop with this. It's arguably the best and much closer to the top than the bottom. Best pacing of all Zeldas, most touching story, and terrific worldbuilding and levels.
Not a “hot take”, the OG LoZ and A Link to the past were the best titles in the series period.I realized this a while ago but my opinion has only been reinforced by playing Link's Awakening remake. I'm having so much fun with it and one of the main reasons is the pacing; 2D Zelda games send you from one adventure to the next and the little side-quests are fun. 3D ones on the other hand love wasting your time with mundane garbage you don't care about.
I can't even play TP or WW anymore because of the incredibly long and tedious opening sections. The whole wolf shit in TP wears thin after a couple of minutes and you just wanna go back to being Link but every dungeon is padded with bullshit you gotta do with wolf Link. Wind Waker? Same problem. The opening is a slog and getting from one temple to the next is sleep-inducing and don't get me started with the Triforce hunt.
OOT is also pretty bad there but not as horrible as the GC title. Skyward Sword is just lol. This has somewhat been remedied by BOTW and TOTK but these two games lack too many things that made past Zelda games great. MM is the exception to this rule because the worldbuilding and side-quests are actually fascinating and better than the main game.
Minish Cap, Link's Awakening, the Oracle games, A Link Between Worlds...just brilliant. A Link to the Past is also pretty fantastic but I feel overstays its welcome a bit with one too many dungeons. I need to do the DS ones next because I never played them.
Fight me.
How do you mean? It is better in its pacing and character interactions than A Link to the Past. I may find Oracle of Seasons to be more interesting, but even the final boss battle is the best of any Zelda game to me.
I mean, is not a bad game, it's Zelda after all. But every other is better in multiple ways. Oracle games have like double the items and the map has multiple versions, on top of being a interconnected history. Minishp cap has the best companion of the series, and the Kingston mechanic allows for character interaction that no other Zelda have. A link to the past maybe overstay a bit, but also set the template of all Zelda that came after, with it's lore, it's multiple worlds, and it's verticality. Hell, even Zelda 2 has a unique combat system and magic system.No, just stop with this. It's arguably the best and much closer to the top than the bottom. Best pacing of all Zeldas, most touching story, and terrific worldbuilding and levels.
Nah, 2D Mario us still king, SMB and SMW are the Goats. Metroid too, the OG, of course Super Metroid 2, and latest Fusion are the best in class.3D Zelda < 2D Zelda
3D Mario > 2D Mario
3D Metroid = 2D Metroid
This has little to do with 2D vs 3D. You are just comparing open world against classic gameplay. Go play Wind Waker and Skyward Sword.Idk, I've attempted to get into multiple 2d Zeldas and bounce off of them almost immediately. 200 hrs in both newer ones and probably 20 in OoT. Maybe one day it will click.
I also refuse to believe that anyone would immediately “bounce off” of Link to the Past.
Of course it doesn't have much to do with "2D vs 3D" as the style of the game is what matters, and in Zelda's case, there is a clear difference in style between the classic formula and newer releases. The classic style just doesn't do it for me. The 20 hours in OoT didn't come easy as it is closer to LttP than BoTW or TotK. I'm not dissing the games, I just don't like them very much. I think it's the shallow combat that does it in for me.This has little to do with 2D vs 3D. You are just comparing open world against classic gameplay. Go play Wind Waker and Skyward Sword.
I also refuse to believe that anyone would immediately “bounce off” of Link to the Past.
OG Zelda is open world tho, botw and totk captured this feeling way more than the other 3d games.The open world Zelda are just not good imo. I could care less. LTTP or the OG Zelda no contest.
For the most part - 2d beats 3d everytime.
Not a hot take.
Castlevania, Contra, Mario, Metroid.
2d shmups are the best gaming genre period.
In LoZ the pixel art difference seems most night and day between the two versions of LA. One is perfection and the other is just...intentionally plastic.Always was. Also applies to Mario and Kirby. And pixel-art was better than 3D as well.
There is no need for alternate worlds as Link's Awakening already has an interesting one. The Kinstone collection acts as an unnecessary prerequisite for finding unlockables in the world of Minish Cap. I am sorry you got stunlocked and that Mario fan service rubbed you the wrong way. Disagree about GBC chiptune of combined instruments sounding like rubbish. Your actions in the game bring Link out of a coma, which is a novel idea relative to saving the world from Ganondorf for the nth time.I mean, is not a bad game, it's Zelda after all. But every other is better in multiple ways. Oracle games have like double the items and the map has multiple versions, on top of being a interconnected history. Minishp cap has the best companion of the series, and the Kingston mechanic allows for character interaction that no other Zelda have. A link to the past maybe overstay a bit, but also set the template of all Zelda that came after, with it's lore, it's multiple worlds, and it's verticality. Hell, even Zelda 2 has a unique combat system and magic system.
Besides a lot of the design is really clunky and put together with tape sometimes. I got soft lock on the second dungeon once. A lot of content is fan service for Mario (like the chomp chomp and the yoshi doll). I like the idea of collecting multiple instruments, but man, the music that all put together plays is awful, literally the worst of the entire franchise.
And the history gives you 0 agency, I don't understand why people like it. You showing up don't solve really change anything.
Well, duh? A Link to The Past is one of the greatest games of all time, and infinitely better than any 3D Zelda game ever.
The other 2D Zeldas aren't as great, but close enough.
Not a “hot take”, the OG LoZ and A Link to the past were the best titles in the series period.
There are "hot takes", and there's just being plain wrong.The Link's Awakening remake sucks though.
Adventure of Link is better than any other Zelda, 2D or 3D.That’s not hot.
Now if you said Zelda 2 is better than some 3D Zeldas, well, you wouldn’t have to pay for heating this winter, OP. (but I wouldn’t disagree, it’s a criminally underrated game)
This is so wrong I don’t even know what to say.I mean, is not a bad game, it's Zelda after all. But every other is better in multiple ways. Oracle games have like double the items and the map has multiple versions, on top of being a interconnected history. Minishp cap has the best companion of the series, and the Kingston mechanic allows for character interaction that no other Zelda have. A link to the past maybe overstay a bit, but also set the template of all Zelda that came after, with it's lore, it's multiple worlds, and it's verticality. Hell, even Zelda 2 has a unique combat system and magic system.
Besides a lot of the design is really clunky and put together with tape sometimes. I got soft lock on the second dungeon once. A lot of content is fan service for Mario (like the chomp chomp and the yoshi doll). I like the idea of collecting multiple instruments, but man, the music that all put together plays is awful, literally the worst of the entire franchise.
And the history gives you 0 agency, I don't understand why people like it. You showing up don't solve really change anything.
ALBW is so underrated
This is lukewarm at best and decades only at this point.“Hottest take of the year”
What's keeping them from making a new 2D Zelda? Clearly they could do it on a shoestring budget compared to their AAA 3D ones. Actually I wouldn't at all mind a new top-down polygonal Zelda, a'la the Links Awakening remake, but in an original game. They could do so much with that format now.
Nah, 2D Mario us still king, SMB and SMW are the Goats. Metroid too, the OG, of course Super Metroid 2, and latest Fusion are the best in class.
Of course it doesn't have much to do with "2D vs 3D" as the style of the game is what matters, and in Zelda's case, there is a clear difference in style between the classic formula and newer releases. The classic style just doesn't do it for me. The 20 hours in OoT didn't come easy as it is closer to LttP than BoTW or TotK. I'm not dissing the games, I just don't like them very much. I think it's the shallow combat that does it in for me.
I have bounced off of Link to the Past 6 times at minimum starting around launch of the game to present. I have never played Wind Waker, but was really turned off by Skyward Sword pacing. I got bored rather quickly with SS.
Zelda 2 the thread.