GuyKazama
Member
Someone already did: Star Wars anti-cheese Edition
These edits made the movies tolerable. The best change is that he replaced most of the alien dialogue with subtitles.
Someone already did: Star Wars anti-cheese Edition
The answer pretty much exists as-is in the form of "The Clone Wars"
Page one rewrite.
Actually someone mentioned that Disney has basically completely shunned the Old Republic stuff in their Star Wars stuff. Like they too don't want to acknowledge the prequels.
....How plausible is it that they'd just reboot Episodes 1 - 3?
I'd be down, I'd watch just for the sheer curiosity alone.
1.) Remove Phantom Menace, its the MOST awful movie, but its completely unecessary.
2.) Have an entire movie that revolves around Obi Wan training Anakin or some kind of bro down adventure where you actually get the feeling that these two people are friends.
3.) Re-write all of the dialog, also come up with a new cause of death for Padme
AOTC is unquestionably the worst of the bunch. Which is not to say TPM is a good film.Fixed that for you.
Should of let Michael Bay direct the prequels.
AOTC is unquestionably the worst of the bunch. Which is not to say TPM is a good film.
Should of let Michael Bay direct the prequels.
The answer pretty much exists as-is in the form of "The Clone Wars"
It uses the most practical sets and effects. II especially looked like real actors pasted into an early PS3 cutscene. Dated AF CGI making up environments, effects, and whole characters throughout most of the movie.Visually at least TPM has aged the best out of the three.
How would you fix the Star Wars prequels?
So if Lucas is Anakin/Vader, a perspective that's easy to get behind in terms of all the parallels with reality (in the way Bobby so eloquently explained it, not in the sense that he's an evil person or anything), who else is part of the story?
Well that's the other part of the problem: I don't think he ever looked at anyone else in the story as characters in their own right. There was Anakin, and there was Lucas pouring part of himself into Anakin, and then there's a bunch of ciphers doing bad imitations of themselves bouncing off Anakin while Lucas maneuvers the POV character (that shouldn't be) into positions so that he can fall, but you understand (and partially even sympathize with) why he fell.
Whereas if he doesn't make Vader a POV and doesn't write the entire three film cycle from that POV, you might actually end up with more interesting characters.
SolVanderlyn said:Why didn't we start with Padawan Anakin? Why didn't we see more of Obi-wan and Anakin doing Jedi missions together? Far too much time was wasted on space politics and extraneous setup. I think it would also have been much better if Anakin was not space Jesus and was simply a very talented Jedi Knight.
Make Jar Jar motherfucking Binks the Sith Lord in disguise he was always meant to be. Just not a racist caricature one.
Have Jar Jar take out Maul in secret in the 2nd film, revealing him as the big bad.
Grievous is a throwaway baddie leading the droids.
No podracing or kid Anakin.
Decent writing and acting.
More Ian McDiarmid.
More Ewan McGregor.
More female characters who pass the bechdel test.
I mean no disrespect whatsoever to Lucas but these parallels make it seem like the entire prequel trilogy was basically a gigantic therapy session.
These ideas have existed for many years as kind of fan theories, but having Lucas admit to parts of it is a whole different story as far as I'm concerned.They kinda were. Read up on what happened between Lucas and his wife Marcia. Then watch the ending talk in RotS between Anakin and Padme.
It actually becomes tragic...
Edit: I mean Marcia. Damn you BvS!!!!