Support NeoGAF

[Who]

That's not the part he was talking about and you know it.

I'm sorry but if you can admit she's a liar and bought out by special interests, it's not too big of a leap to then suggest she's vile and un-human.

Ecspecially when she's supposed to represent the will of the people and presents herself as such a person.

 

[Armaros]

Eh I said my piece. If you look at her actions and listen to her words and don't see a disgusting and vile human, we just have 2 vastly different perspectives and/or standards.

With zero evidence or even hint of rumor after a lifetime in public spotlight.
Also it's funny you don't apply the same lanaguage vs Trump and even give him a 'tell it like it is' compliment and yet say both are the same.

Only Hillary is un-human, I wonder why that would be.

 

[TheSeks]

"I pretend to dislike Donald Trump, but I'm a closet bigot and he might get my vote"

Exactly. As soon as I heard they were a boomer I OprahSquint.gif'd and ignored the rest of the article.

 

[ItWasMeantToBe19]

How the fuck didn't this get more coverage

Percentage of Americans that care about scientific accuracy < 10% of U.S. population.

 

[Liu Kang Baking A Pie]

Donald Trump supporters say "I'm sorry" before their opinions a lot.

 

[Voysa Reezun]

See, he thinks he's part of a new silent majority, but he's not. Black people, brown people, and college-educated women combined together in one bloc are the new silent majority, which explains why Trump is headed for an eight-to-twelve point loss in November.

 

[rjinaz]

Wait so is Hillary a robot, animal, or alien now? I'm so confused.

 

[atr0cious]

Eh I said my piece. If you look at her actions and listen to her words and don't see a disgusting and vile human, we just have 2 vastly different perspectives and/or standards.

You're right, we're not sexists who believe everything they here.

 

[Who]

You're right, we're not sexists who believe everything they here.

Touché?

What the hell are you talking about?

 

[danm999]

Wait so is Hillary a robot, animal, or alien now? I'm so confused.

She lies and likes money.

Humans don't do that apparently.

 

[TestOfTide]

Eh I said my piece. If you look at her actions and listen to her words and don't see a disgusting and vile human, we just have 2 vastly different perspectives and/or standards.

I'm looking at her actions and words and see a flawed candidate that hasn't done or said anything close to the examples I gave of Trump's horrors.

All I asked for was some actual examples of things Hillary "secretly thinks" that is worse than, say, making fun of cerebral palsy.

 

[m_shortpants]

We long for a bygone era when you didn’t need “safe spaces” on college campuses to shelter students from the atrocity of dissenting opinions, lest their sensibilities be offended.

Read as: I can't be racist anymore

 

[Who]

I'm looking at her actions and words and see a flawed candidate that hasn't done or said anything close to the examples I gave of Trump's horrors.

All I asked for was some actual examples of things Hillary "secretly thinks" that is worse than, say, making fun of cerebral palsy.

I'm saying based off her lies and the character she seemingly has, I wouldn't be surprised to find out she's really just as vile as Donald Trump. I stand by the word guarantee. Call it intuition.

 

[atr0cious]

Touché?

What the hell are you talking about?

You seem to get all your info from Reddit, you should do some actual research instead of this claiming shit without any actual proof.

 

[23qwerty]

I'm sorry but if you can admit she's a liar and bought out by special interests, it's not too big of a leap to then suggest she's vile and un-human.

wh-what?

 

[Armaros]

You seem to get all your info from Reddit, you should do some actual research instead of this claiming shit without any actual proof.

Who needs proof when you have pure 100% I'm not a sexist intuition.

 

[atr0cious]

I'm saying based off her lies and the character she seemingly has, I wouldn't be surprised to find out she's really just as vile as Donald Trump. I stand by the word guarantee. Call it intuition.

Yea, see this right here, shows you don't really have the grasp on reality you think you do.

 

[FrenchMovieTheme]

I'm sorry but if you can admit she's a liar and bought out by special interests, it's not too big of a leap to then suggest she's vile and un-human.

Ecspecially when she's supposed to represent the will of the people and presents herself as such a person.

A politician lied?! Well I never!

What special interests bought her?

I guess if you throw out vague shit some people will just believe it. Hillary will make am excellent president. She has had some mistakes in the past, like all presidents, but she has what it takes to succeed.

 

[Who]

You seem to get all your info from Reddit, you should do some actual research instead of this claiming shit without any actual proof.

I have no issues proving to you she's a liar and bought out by special interests, which is what I'm using to assess what her true character actually is.

 

[TestOfTide]

I'm saying based off her lies and the character she seemingly has, I wouldn't be surprised to find out she's really just as vile as Donald Trump. I stand by the word guarantee. Call it intuition.

Such as? Lying about a trip to Bosnia doesn't compare to the examples I gave.

Plus, Trump has been proven to be just as much of a liar if not more so.

Your argument about Hillary's character might have had a little bit of weight if it weren't in comparison to the guy who made fun of a guy for having a fucking disability.

 

[Armaros]

I have no issues proving to you she's a liar and bought out by special interests, which is what I'm using to assess what her true character actually is.

So lay it out? You are saying one leads to the other, so you should easily be able to prove it. You said you said your last piece and yet you are still going on about how proof exist but won't state any

So are you going to end this or just keep talking in circles?

 

[Elfforkusu]

Prioritize what differently? I'm honestly curious, what outweighs all of Trump's blatant bigotry? What is more important?

I don't know -- I'm not going to vote for him. What I'm referring to is a sentiment that came out of the Bernie threads, which was really enlightening to me.

But I will say that I'm not going to ostracize someone simply on the basis that they vote for Trump. That is probably a controversial statement in and of itself!

 

[Who]

Such as? Lying about a trip to Bosnia doesn't compare to the examples I gave.

Plus, Trump has been proven to be just as much of a liar if not more so.

True. I don't like Trump. I don't like Clinton either. They're both vile humans in my book.

 

[atr0cious]

I have no issues proving to you she's a liar and bought out by special interests, which is what I'm using to assess what her true character actually is.

Since Bernie couldn't prove this, I'm excited to see your findings.

 

[zaccheus]

A politician lied?! Well I never!

What special interests bought her?

I guess if you throw out vague shit some people will just believe it. Hillary will make am excellent president. She has had some mistakes in the past, like all presidents, but she has what it takes to succeed.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-speeches-218969
Clinton was paid 222000 dollars to give a speech to goldman sachs (one of the big banks that were bailed out). that is really fucking corrupt. but it's par for the course for most politicians.

 

[Who]

So lay it out? You are saying one leads to the other, so you should easily be able to prove it. You said you said your last piece and yet you are still going on about how proof exist but won't state any

Awww... You think she's not bought out and corrupt? God bless you. Proof is in this very thread. Link above me.

Peace.

 

[EatinOlives]

Atleast Trump comes across as a genuine human being, flawed and bigoted as he is.

I'm dying to see what makes you think so, because as you probably already know whether he comes off as genuine is completely subjective. I personally do not trust a single word that comes out of that snake's mouth, considering he has walked back his words almost as often (if not more) than he has stood by them.

In other words, YOU think he's genuine. Why, exactly?

 

[Armaros]

Awww... You think she's not bought out and corrupt? God bless you. Proof is in this very thread. Link above me.

Peace.

Okay, so you won't then. The same old Bernie stuff that even he admited he couldn't show any proof doesn't go anywhere.

 

[stonesak]

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-speeches-218969
Clinton was paid 222000 dollars to give a speech to goldman sachs (one of the big banks that were bailed out). that is really fucking corrupt. but it's par for the course for most politicians.

That's what they offered.

 

[Who]

I'm dying to see what makes you think so, because as you probably already know whether he comes off as genuine is completely subjective. I personally do not trust a single word that comes out of that snake's mouth, considering he has walked back his words almost as often (if not more) than he has stood by them.

In other words, YOU think he's genuine. Why, exactly?

I think he comes across more genuine than Hilary. I don't think he's a genuine human nor do I like or respect him.

 

[Trojita]

I looked into this guy and the dude has had a massive chip on his shoulder since grade school because he had ADHD and mild Dyslexia. His comments about ADHD are full of resentment about how he was treated in school, condescension for the "gifted students", and contradictory statements about "political correctness running amuk in our schools".

He does agree that ADHD kids have better support today, but he purports that "gifted children programs" and the programs to put learning development kids in different groups is "Political Correctness".

Anyone see a problem here?

You can read it here

 

[TestOfTide]

True. I don't like Trump. I don't like Clinton either. They're both vile humans in my book.

Your moving the goalposts by now claiming they are equal.

Again, you said in this very thread TWICE that Hillary has secret opinions that are worse than Trumps well known opinions, but failed to provide any evidence of such.

 

[atr0cious]

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-speeches-218969
Clinton was paid 222000 dollars to give a speech to goldman sachs (one of the big banks that were bailed out). that is really fucking corrupt. but it's par for the course for most politicians.

Lmao, so just getting money is corrupt, regardless of how it was gotten, what the speech was about or if quid pro quo took place like with "most politicians."

You kids need to figure out what the word proof actual means. Use Wikipedia if you have to.

 

[Pachinko]

yet another reason why people who retire shouldn't be allowed to vote. Ugh.

 

[kess]

yet another reason why people who retire shouldn't be allowed to vote. Ugh.

More than half of the people I work with are probably going to vote for Trump, so I doubt that would do any good.

 

[Finale Fireworker]

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-speeches-218969
Clinton was paid 222000 dollars to give a speech to goldman sachs (one of the big banks that were bailed out). that is really fucking corrupt. but it's par for the course for most politicians.

The likes of Goldman Sachs and BP also financed Barack Obama, didn't they? And he's our glorious emperor, esteemed and beloved by all. Generally, I don't mind where the money is coming from, as long as you do good for America.

You can argue whether or not Obama served the interests of his financiers unjustly, but you can't argue he has not tried to do good for America and the American people since the day he got into office. If it took BP money to eliminate the pre-existing condition and stabilize our economy, that is unfortunately okay for me.

So I don't care that Hillary took 220,000 from Goldman Sachs. It's not where the money comes from, it's how you use it. I say this as somebody who donated hundreds of dollars of his paltry paycheck month after month to support Bernie Sanders.

 

[FrenchMovieTheme]

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-speeches-218969
Clinton was paid 222000 dollars to give a speech to goldman sachs (one of the big banks that were bailed out). that is really fucking corrupt. but it's par for the course for most politicians.

Uh ok? What is being implied? That she got the money for the speech in exchange for favors to Goldman sachs? What favors did they ultimately get?

 

[kirblar]

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-speeches-218969
Clinton was paid 222000 dollars to give a speech to goldman sachs (one of the big banks that were bailed out). that is really fucking corrupt. but it's par for the course for most politicians.

Yes, they paid her to give a speech.

That's not corruption, that's an appearance fee.

 

[Siegcram]

I'm sorry but if you can admit she's a liar and bought out by special interests, it's not too big of a leap to then suggest she's vile and un-human.

Ecspecially when she's supposed to represent the will of the people and presents herself as such a person.

Calling others vile and inhuman based off your own leaps of logic says a whole lot more about you than about her.

 

[Elfforkusu]

Okay, so you won't then. The same old Bernie stuff that even he admited he couldn't show any proof.

The implication that Bernie was going after Hillary as hard as anyone possibly could is hilarious to me. He had kid gloves on basically the whole campaign (and so did she towards him).


The Hillary speeches thing can be summarized into a few questions:
1. do you think a politician might be swayed by being paid millions of dollars by corporations they are supposed to regulate?
2. if yes, do you think that Hillary is uniquely qualified to avoid this sway?

#1 feels like a given, and #2 seems a remarkable leap of faith to me.


Both questions seem moot when Trump is the "alternative", though.

 

[TestOfTide]

Awww... You think she's not bought out and corrupt? God bless you. Proof is in this very thread. Link above me.

Peace.

Even Obama has been paid by the big financial groups. Do you think Obama is less genuine than Trump?

Hell, literally the only reason those groups aren't quick to back Trump is because they don't want to waste money on an obvious loser.

 

[Who]

Your moving the goalposts by now claiming they are equal.

Again, you said in this very thread TWICE that Hillary has secret opinions that are worse than Trumps well known opinions, but failed to provide any evidence of such.

I assume as much based off what I know about her. I've seen her lie, bold-faced, dozens of times without flinching. She's gross and corrupt. I don't like her one bit, and yes, am sure she has disgusting views based off that.

Are we not allowed to share opinions based off facts?
I can't prove that she has vile beliefs but I can prove that she's a liar and corrupt. God I'm just saying the same shit over and over.

Why do people feel the need to defend such a person?

 

[johnsmith]

This is probably the worst opinion piece I've ever read. The entire thing is garbage.

And we know that if Trump makes it all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., the view after that is murky at best. We’re confident that he will surround himself with smart and capable people from the business world, as well as some Capitol Hill veterans. But here’s the rub: Past business associates describe him as a micromanager who likes yes men at his side. How long this new Washington brain trust will last in a Trump administration is anybody’s guess.

You're confident he's going to pick quality people for his administration, yet in the same paragraph you admit that he's going to surround himself sycophants. Ok.

Who’s to blame for the Trump phenomenon? There’s culpability on both sides of the aisle for the absence of bipartisanship that fueled his rise.

No. Fuck you. It's not both sides. Your stupid, racist side is responsible for Trump.

 

[K' Dash]

"I pretend to dislike Donald Trump, but I'm a closet bigot and he might get my vote"

Yup.

 

[Mizerman]

Why do people feel the need to defend such a person?

Same question I wonder to those who defend Trump.

 

[Liu Kang Baking A Pie]

Poster says Trump is more genuine based on what he has said compared to what poster assumes Hillary thinks.

I mean, this thread is all about Trump fans upset about being called words, but what do you call this?

Bait.

 

[ishibear]

Now why the fuck would you --

Baby boomers

Oh. Yeah lol nope.

 

[Who]

Same question I wonder to those who defend Trump.

I have that question too. He's a terrible person.

 

[FrenchMovieTheme]

I think he comes across more genuine than Hilary. I don't think he's a genuine human nor do I like or respect him.

Lol!

So, you can be a racist piece of human garbage and as long as you're up front about it, that person has your respect over someone you "have an intuition" might be a dirtbag in private?

 

[PopeReal]

I always love the people who get caught spouting bullshit with nothing to back it up and all they can do is fall back to the standard "they are both bad" line. They can't even say anything good about Trump.

And you know they are voting for him.