I specifically said if someone decided to be malicious. That means if someone decided to knowingly cause him shit - which, do you not think is something that could potentially happen?
If he 'does something like this again' - as in, does nothing offensive but has someone misconstrue it as offensive you are okay with him in getting in even more trouble? My point isn't about the likelihood of him having another mishap with a co-worker (not that unlikely) my point is that this mishap should in no way shape and form have any negative repercussions for him at work.
I just don't understand why OP has to make the effort of staying out of the break room when he wasn't at fault.
It seems like HR is covering their asses at the expense of OP.
I seriously wonder how people like his coworker function in life if they feel sexually harassed every time they see someone adjusting their clothing in public.
Would you seriously feel the same way about the situation if the genders were reversed and a woman was adjusting her dress/bra strap?
Sorry you misunderstood what I said. Just thinking about this guys situation, made me think of all the millions of times I've heard her go on about sexual harassment. She even once went on for hours about how one of my groomsmen and his friend of mine were "eye raping" her at my wedding. I let her make a fool out of herself infront of everybody, then let her know my buddy was gay. She is just a fantastic person.
She took it the wrong way. Seems stupid that they automatically think you're guilty.
The first part of your post is pretty unlikely for a lot of reasons. False reporting isn't terribly common and it takes a decent amount of investigation and some form of cause one way for someone to be able to "cause shit".
The second part of your post - yes because in situations like this it doesn't matter what you feel about your actions, what matters is how they make the people around you feel. I am sure if you were to ask most people who have gone through a similar situation they would tell you the same thing - total misunderstanding, didn't mean anything by it, etc. And a lot of them, probably most of them, would be being truthful. But that doesn't matter. If you have someone consistently acting out in a way that makes others uncomfortable, particularly sexually, you have to act. It's your responsibility as an employer.
If she felt she had to report it, she didn't feel it was innocent. And if she didn't feel it was innocent, why should she wait for it to happen again?I'd avoid someone that reports something so innocent without it being a repeat offense.
It might seem unfair, but no. If someone feels threatened, having them talk it out, even with a 3rd party would just make them feel like they are on trial, and would lead to even less people reporting harassment.This part aggravates me the most because you should be able to talk to the people who have a problem with you. A neutral third party may be needed to monitor that meeting but that's what HR should be for, conflict resolution.
I'd wait to verify it wasn't innocent instead of assuming it wasn't because that's not the type of work environment I'd want to create. Obviously, if there's a chance of being harmed, that changes things, but that's not the case here.If she felt she had to report it, she didn't feel it was innocent. And if she didn't feel it was innocent, why should she wait for it to happen again?
I honestly had hopes that the neogaf community would be less toxic than it is showing itself to be in this thread. We have literally zero information on what this woman did in her reporting, and yet look at all the crazy conclusions people are jumping to.
Some men all excited that they get to throw out their favorite words 'bitch' and 'cunt'. Plus a little advocation of violence and sexual harrassment as retaliation. I mean, I get that some of it is a little jokey and whatever, but do any of you guys realize that this is why women are afraid to reveal themselves? Afraid to speak their minds about anything?
Women have legitimate reasons to be afraid of men, you don't know anything about this woman's life and yet some misogynist piece of crap feels free to put out something like "she's playing the woman card". Unbelievable.
Not to mention that any time someone tries to be serious about these issues you'll have some immature responses that dismiss you out of hand as a 'white knight', pussy, whatever. It's like some of you guys just can't wait until there's an opportunity for you to bring out the sexist insults. It seems some people are incapable of seeing a situation from another perspective.
I have to say, big compliments to the OP for how he's handling this. It's an unfortunate misunderstanding which has been exacerbated by stringent policies that have to be followed. I feel like in an ideal system there would be opportunity to defend yourself, but it's not ideal, it's setup to protect a vulnerable class of people and so there are going to be abuses and misuses of the system.
This isn't a fault of anybody in this situation, it's a societal fault that has required this system to be in place because of the actions of some men, and it's impossible to determine which men are which before they act.
And please, if you're thinking of something involving NOT ALL MEN, or BUT WOMEN TOO, just stop right there.
In this thread, we see the answer to the common question people often ask around here: "Why didn't she just report it?"
Grimes, you handled the situation well. Well done.
Everyone screaming for retaliation, calling her a bitch, and threatening violence....you are the reason only 15% of such things are actually reported. Good job.
. That last good job was sarcastic of course.
People shouldn't be expected to walk on eggshells because of one paranoid person's hangups about the human anatomy and using HR to make that happen is wholly inappropriate.
Falsely reporting every innocuous action that happens near one's genitalia as sexual harassment does matter as it hurts the credibility of serious claims. Creating a safe and receptive work environment doesn't involve sounding the alarms, pulling out the pitchforks, and going on a witch hunt every time someone's hands go near their genitalia. Context matters and sexual harassment claims need to be held to a much higher standard than something as subjective as one's comfort level.
Fast forward so not sure if it's been answered: can't you appeal?
Ask your supervisor since if the claim false and can have negative consequences, you sod be able to appeal. And document all correspondence. If nothing is documented, you'll have a tougher time responding.
Documenting can just be you listing what happened, what was said, your side of the story, them acknowledging your side and the consequences. Email is good.
It may be nothing but you'll want a paper/digital trail if anything goes sour. And documentation probably helps people straighten up.
Honestly if I were in your position I would hit that stupid bitch and put her in her place.
The only correct answer for dealing with it now is total avoidance of the person. Like cross the street and walk on the opposite sidewalk and never make eye contact. Look away and up.
Well that smells and is a proven health hazard which has to be disposed of properly. Adjusting clothing isn't. Or feeding a baby.We also have to defecate, but at least where I work we go to a private area in the office to do this. To the best of my knowledge, public breastfeeding advocates are more concerned with public areas than private businesses that are not open to the public, so long as the latter makes accommodations for mothers.
Context does matter. In this case, these two disagree on the context. Unfortunately, whether you feel your actions are misconstrued or not, they are still your actions and as a functioning member of society you have to own that.
There's a reason why it isn't "oh man, person x said this happened and now they're uncomfortable around person y, we should fire them," and instead it's "well, it's kind of silly, but we'll denote that we spoke about it and file it away." There are a variety of responses for a variety of situations. "Do nothing" though isn't an acceptable response for an employer, period.
I worked at a company were a guy got fired for doing this very thing, he asked one of the safety girls out on a date. She reported him for sexual misconduct, so after his "2 week vacation" he completely avoided, ignored, left the room when she entered and so forth. Less than a month later they fired him because they said he was socially isolating her and that was considered harassment.
Context does matter. In this case, these two disagree on the context. Unfortunately, whether you feel your actions are misconstrued or not, they are still your actions and as a functioning member of society you have to own that.
There's a reason why it isn't "oh man, person x said this happened and now they're uncomfortable around person y, we should fire them," and instead it's "well, it's kind of silly, but we'll denote that we spoke about it and file it away." There are a variety of responses for a variety of situations. "Do nothing" though isn't an acceptable response for an employer, period.
I once nearly got written up for hugging a coworker. Wait. It gets worse. It wasn't by the person I was hugging. It was by someone who saw "the incident"
I worked with this lovely lady named Rita. Who worked remotely and I only saw her about once every half year. So she came to my office and shouted "Ronito!!" And gave me a huge hug. Meanwhile a lady coworker saw us and said, "You should be careful that you don't get written up for sexual harassment!"
I was too confused to say anything and Rita said, "We're not harassing each other, we're friends and we're hugging."
To which the coworker replied, "Sexual harassment isn't just about how you feel. You're harassing me by making me feel uncomfortable."
I was too gobsmacked to say anything. Rita just said, "If a hug with friends makes you uncomfortable then you can just look away."
Luckily it ended there but man, I couldn't understand it, and frankly it's made me afraid to be friendly with people at work.
I hate to say it, but if this is the kind of thing that is getting reported as harassment then maybe less reporting of harassment would be a good thing.If she felt she had to report it, she didn't feel it was innocent. And if she didn't feel it was innocent, why should she wait for it to happen again?
Sorry to hear about this OP, but HR is doing the right thing, even though I fully believe you had no bad intentions.
It might seem unfair, but no. If someone feels threatened, having them talk it out, even with a 3rd party would just make them feel like they are on trial, and would lead to even less people reporting harassment.
I worked at a company were a guy got fired for doing this very thing, he asked one of the safety girls out on a date. She reported him for sexual misconduct, so after his "2 week vacation" he completely avoided, ignored, left the room when she entered and so forth. Less than a month later they fired him because they said he was socially isolating her and that was considered harassment.
Thats something to consider as well OP, if she really pushes it there is nothing you can do and you could be discharged as being an "administration burden"
Part of being a "functioning member of society" is acknowledging and accepting that every little thing that makes you uncomfortable isn't grounds for reprimand. Again, one's "comfort" is far too subjective a thing to act on in every single instance. I'm not discouraging the "ownership" of one's actions: I'm questioning the logic of allowing the most paranoid among us create a horrifically uncomfortable work environment for everyone else. What happened in this instance was at worst a faux pas.
This is especially true when two informal counselings can be treated as a formal counseling and placed on a person's work record as is the case here. TrueGrime shouldn't get a formal reprimand on his record next time he scratches his ass in the breakroom and someone happens by at the moment.
This is part of standard a sexual harassment training. While a lot of it is needed... for instance, someone overhearing an inappropriate joke, even if not directed at them. It also opens the door to the stuff in the quote.Holy shit, WHAT!?
This is part of standard a sexual harassment training. While a lot of it is needed... for instance, someone overhearing an inappropriate joke, even if not directed at them. It also opens the door to the stuff in the quote.
Guy is lucky the other worker dropped it there.
Its still just hugging. Isnt that a normal thing? I mean would people feel uncomfortable when I stretch myself?
This is part of standard a sexual harassment training. While a lot of it is needed... for instance, someone overhearing an inappropriate joke, even if not directed at them. It also opens the door to the stuff in the quote.
Guy is lucky the other worker dropped it there.
I don't think that hugging at work is either appropriate or normal in a real profession. Retail, who knows.
I once nearly got written up for hugging a coworker. Wait. It gets worse. It wasn't by the person I was hugging. It was by someone who saw "the incident"
I worked with this lovely lady named Rita. Who worked remotely and I only saw her about once every half year. So she came to my office and shouted "Ronito!!" And gave me a huge hug. Meanwhile a lady coworker saw us and said, "You should be careful that you don't get written up for sexual harassment!"
I was too confused to say anything and Rita said, "We're not harassing each other, we're friends and we're hugging."
To which the coworker replied, "Sexual harassment isn't just about how you feel. You're harassing me by making me feel uncomfortable."
I was too gobsmacked to say anything. Rita just said, "If a hug with friends makes you uncomfortable then you can just look away."
Luckily it ended there but man, I couldn't understand it, and frankly it's made me afraid to be friendly with people at work.
I don't think that hugging at work is either appropriate or normal in a real profession. Retail, who knows.
People loooooove to hug in education.
I think being a female-dominated field makes a lot of behaviors come to surface that would never fly in other office settings (or at least the tech environments I've been in).OMG! I thought I was the only one that thought that was weird. This lady that hugged me at work I talked to nearly every day and we were very close. But I went to an education client after being off at a different client for 3 months and 3 different people hugged me.
Well, lets say you just went through a painful divorce. Your husband left you as he claimed he was tired of your emotional coldness. Your never hugged or kissed growing up, you just simply didn't have that kind of friends or family. So being demonstrative, or seeing even complete strangers others acting affectionately reminds you of your issues and makes you feel depressed.I understand dirty jokes or sexual undertones. But hugging?
I mean it would seem then that lines are arbitrary.
Again I could understand if the person being hugged was like "Man, that's not ok" I get that totally. But saying "ew, they're hugging!" that's not going to be sustainable.
And yeah I get that it's not normal but at the same time it's not a normal thing, but then again it's someone that I hadn't seen for nearly a year. I don't think it's beyond the range of possibility.