This is an expensive hobby, especially if you don't do some research first.
Yeah it is. I'm sitting on a aging Q6600 4GB DDR2 HD 4890 40GB SSD, build, wanting to get a nice DX11 card (maybe a HD7850), but after you add it all up the cost is high, even when reusing my current 1TB mechanical HDD, PSU, copy of Windows, and DVD drive.
For a decent i52500k build with a 128GB SSD (technically I dont need these, but I feel a bit squeezed with my current 40GB SSD, and it's one of those that feels like as long as you're doing a rebuild might as well go all the way), HD7850 (which isn't even that great) and a $100 budgeted for a nice modern case (mine is an old piece of crap, if I'm rebuilding anyway def need to get a new case) I end up at like $940...I can think of better things to spend a grand on, like putting new carpet in my house...
My other option is to try to OC the Q6600 to 3.2 or so and stick with it. When I went on H and asked about keeping the Q6600 they all yelled at me and told me I was stupid, and I needed a new CPU first and foremost and DO NOT buy a new GPU without one etc. However, I see benchmarks that show even a Q6600 does NOT bottleneck a lot of games, so I'm torn.
The other problem is RAM, the 4GB I have feels light for my tastes if I'm going to stick with the Q6600 for a while, but since I have a 4X1GB config, and I have old DDR2, upgrading is expensive. Best I can do is replace with 2X2GB sets, and those run $50 a pop (so it's essentially $50 for me to upgrade to 6GB, or $100 to upgrade to 8GB), and it feels sucky to sink money into a dead end build.
Figured I could pick up some old DDR2 cheapo on ebay, not so, everybody is a miser there and wants close to what I could buy new for.
So yeah my options boil down to:
Tear things up and completely new swanky rig: i52500k, new mobo, 16GB DDR3, 128 SSD, $100 case, HD7850/70=~$950
Option 2: string things along:
HD7850 plus 2X2GB DDR2 (upgrades me to 6GB)+nice air cooler ($30)+Q6600 overclock=$330. Keep everything else I already have.
Option 2, while still expensive in the real world, makes me feel better about myself. However a part of me wonders if I'll eventually grow to wish I had just gone with the clean slate build.
But anyways, say if I do option 1, that so much money. I mean, say a new next gen console came out at $500. Everybody including me would find that a tremendous amount to spend. Yet here I am contemplating 950 on a PC.
Yeah, not really too much point to this post, just kinda talkin to myself.
I guess the sucky thing to me is kinda twofold: SSD's are a mixed blessing. They're cool and all, but in the end they add another expensive must have component to every build, as a guy who's been building his own PC's for years it's definitely a change I've noticed. Second, there's is no middle path, which AMD used to provide but bulldozer sucks so bad it's gone. My only realistic CPU option is a $220 i52500k. Forget bulldozer, and trying to pick up a cheap 1100T or something on sale, just feels like a bandaid as it'll never be much faster than my Q6600 once overclocked. Gone are the days of being able to pick up a cheap, fast AMD CPU for maybe a 100 and maybe a cheap AMD mobo for 60.