It's a non-reference Diamond 290X V2. I bought it on sale.
I don't know if it's throttling... but what else could cause such a drastic drop in performance?
Edit: My afterburner settings
Hey guys, currently looking at the EVGA step up program.. I currently have a 970 SSC ACX 2.0+ and I want to step up to a GTX 980TI. Thing is, I just noticed that you can only use the step up for reference card.
Is there any difference between a reference and a non reference card except the clock speed ? I mean, can I overclock the reference and hope to achieve the same clock speed as the non reference cards ?
Where does it say that? On the step up program webpage, the only GTX 980 Ti model listed as being available is the twin fan ACX2.0+ non-reference model (06G-P4-4991-KR)
Hmm.. So the only difference between this card and the SSC version os the clocking speed ? Nothing else ? If that's the case, I might pull the trigger then.
This would be the EVGA reference model GTX 980 Ti, it has a stock speed of 1000MHz. Other companies also produce reference model GTX 980 Ti with very minor slight differences, like this Gigabyte GTX 980 Ti reference model which just has a slightly different boost clock speed (Gigabyte has 1075MHz boost while EVGA's has 1067MHz boost).
There's no SSC edition. There's the normal speed edition (06G-P4-4991-KR), the SC edition (06G-P4-4993-KR), and the SC+ edition (06G-P4-4995-KR). They all have the same ACX2.0+ twin fan cooler design (triple 8mm heatpipes running through the radiator).
SC edition features a factory overclock for higher speed, and the SC+ edition features same higher speed as the SC but also comes with a metal backplate. The metal backplate is an optional extra, it's said to improve cooling slightly but by how much I don't know. It also reduces graphics card sag.
Hey everyone,
You all helped me with building my very first PC a while ago. I'm running an i5-3570K@3.4ghz. and a 4GB GTX 770. I'm wondering if I should be looking into upgrading my graphics card so that I can continue to play all of my games at 60fps/1080p/ultra. I can play at almost-maxed to max settings at 60 in most games, but it's been about two years since I last upgraded gpus and I'm gonna have a little extra money this summer. What do you think, GAF? Time for an upgrade to something better or should I play the waiting game? What would you recommend I upgrade to? Note: I don't really care about anything higher than 1080p at the moment. That's my standard.
NOPEEEEEEHas reliability gone up for hard drivers over 2tb yet? Or should i just stick to multiple 2tb?
2133 for $5 is good.I've been planning on building a new rig for a while now, and I've just been picking up pieces as I see them on sale.
A seemingly good deal just popped up on Amazon (via SlickDeals: here):
16GB (2x8GB) PNY XLR8 DDR3 1866 CAS Cl9 Desktop Memory for $65
or
16GB (2x8GB) PNY XLR8 DDR3 2133 CAS 10 Desktop Memory for $70
Not really clued in on what the big difference is here (or if there is one if I plan on using the machine mainly for gaming). Is more information needed to give a real opinion on what to go with here?
I avoid RAID on desktops and do backups.how would i go about using a raid setup inside the new pc i'm building? what do i need to get, other than the 2 drives? i'm wanting to do 2 mirrored drives. or should i just be doing routine backups from one drive to the other? anyone have any opinions on that?
my only experience with raid is an external thunderbolt enclosure for my mac, so i didn't have to do anything aside from plugging it in.
I wouldn't get any reference card if I could avoid it, although the 980Ti reference is ok. Can you just flip the card and buy a 980Ti? Difference can't be that much is it?Hey guys, currently looking at the EVGA step up program.. I currently have a 970 SSC ACX 2.0+ and I want to step up to a GTX 980TI. Thing is, I just noticed that you can only use the step up for reference card.
Is there any difference between a reference and a non reference card except the clock speed ? I mean, can I overclock the reference and hope to achieve the same clock speed as the non reference cards ?
Thought so, i'll just buy two 2tb hard drives insteadNOPEEEEEE
Those using the 'older' AMD GCN cards, here is their new drivers which supposedly helped with improving the 390X performance.
AMD is not releasing it for 'old' (2 series) GCN cards.
I have installed it, and it works on 290X. It also enables VSR and FRC.
http://dlcdnet.asus.com/pub/ASUS/vg...5_20.zip?_ga=1.242241866.979263208.1419698452
http://www.asus.com/us/Graphics_Cards/R9390XDC28GD5/HelpDesk_Download/
Those are idle settings, we need to see how fast and hot your graphics card is when it's running at load. Show us the time graph from MSI Afterburner or GPU-Z.
I found this picture of a Diamond R9 290X with the NZXT Kraken G10 bracket. I am not sure whether that is the reference board R9 290X or not, though. If you can take a look at the back of your graphics card and compare layout and size, maybe you can tell if it's the same card and therefore if it would support the Kraken G10 or not.
Where does it say that? On the step up program webpage, the only GTX 980 Ti model listed as being available is the twin fan ACX2.0+ non-reference model (06G-P4-4991-KR).
Do these work with the 4GB cards?Those using the 'older' AMD GCN cards, here is their new drivers which supposedly helped with improving the 390X performance.
AMD is not releasing it for 'old' (2 series) GCN cards.
I have installed it, and it works on 290X. It also enables VSR and FRC.
http://dlcdnet.asus.com/pub/ASUS/vg...5_20.zip?_ga=1.242241866.979263208.1419698452
http://www.asus.com/us/Graphics_Cards/R9390XDC28GD5/HelpDesk_Download/
Sooooo can anyone recommend me other ATX Full Tower cases for me ? I'm leaning towards NZXT Phantom 820 as my case
My setup will be two 980ti's but will buy the 2nd 980ti later
I will need a larged top panel as my cpu fan will be an nzxt kraken x61 replaced with 4 noctua fans
The corsair 780t looks nice and seems people like the phanteks entho too
Well, that's understandable seeing as the 390X is quite literally nearly identical to the 290X barring VRAM and VBIOS.. Will this make a difference for non 290/290X cards?
Do these work with the 4GB cards?
Oh man that looks slick as hell :0I love my Air 540.
Have you updated the BIOS? Sometimes motherboards don't support every type of RAM out of the box and later versions fix it. You can always check the support page to see if your memory is on the list.
The CPU thing is nothing to worry about. A 4690k has a standard frequency of 3.5GHz but can boost up to 3.9GHz depending on the load. Think of it as a built-in overclock.
I power the button in PC, nothing happens. The system stays completely turned off. Usually I'll open of the case and start unplugging and replugging various connections. After a minute of messing around, eventually the thing powers on.
This usually happens for me every couple of days. It just seems random. Sometimes it powers on with no issue and sometimes it won't turn on unless I open up the case as I've mentioned.
Has anyone ever had this issue?
Tbh, i did not even benchmarked between old drivers and this '3-series' drivers. A quick run of TW3 & FFXIV benchmarks encountered no issues. My guess, it depends if 380X and below cards sees any improvements over their 280 counterparts, then this drivers may help. I have also not read reviews of these said cards. No harm trying, only 'problem' is the drivers will show your card as an Asus one.
Yes they work on my 290X 4GB perfectly.
If it's anything like Freesync, vsync on only activates when outside the variable refresh window.Hi Guys,
Hopefully one of you knowledgeable chaps can clarify something for me.
Recently the Nvidia drivers changes to allow different options for G-Sync (G-Sync in windowed mode etc).
it also seems possible to have V-Sync active as well as G-Sync now?
I read that here:
http://www.pcper.com/news/Displays/NVIDIA-G-Sync-Update-New-Monitors-Windowed-Mode-V-Sync-Options
So my question is, if i have G-Sync on in the Nvidia Control panel should i have V-Sync set to on or off in game now?
Roomy midtower ATX cases can fit two GPUs and a big radiator easily, so do you actually need an even larger "full tower"? If not, Enthoo Evolv ATX perhaps? I think it looks better than any of the larger cases.Oh man that looks slick as hell :0
For games right now it is a definite no. It's possible it could change with DirectX 12. The 4690K is easily recommended over the 4790K to save money, especially for games and if you don't mind overclocking.Haven't built a PC in a few years. Do developers make use of hyper-threading at all yet, or is that an unnecessary feature?
So far it looks like the 4690k for me this year.
For games right now it is a definite no. It's possible it could change with DirectX 12.
If you do anything else like video editing then an i7 could be recommended for the hyperthreading.
Nope, just games. Also is the 980ti worth it? I think I'll need it for the 6GB VRAM for VR. I mean business with getting my rig ready for the Vive.
Finally got my second 980ti in the mail, upgraded my psu as well and now sli is ready to go.
Any tip or advice? Aside from the usual warning about support I mean.
Oh man that looks slick as hell :0
Welp seems 780t is real nice so i think i'm just gonna go with that .... Phantom 820 is soooo big it seems like
Well, the HTC Vive consists of two 1080x1200 screens each running at 90Hz. A single screen wouldn't be very demanding, but two of them would require a strong GPU. The Oculus Rift has the same resolution and refresh rate, they recommend a GTX 970 or R9 290 at the least. Not sure if you will actually end up using near 6GB of VRAM across the two screens unless you're playing at extremely high settings on the most demanding games.Nope, just games. Also is the 980ti worth it? I think I'll need it for the 6GB VRAM for VR. I mean business with getting my rig ready for the Vive.
Holy crap SLI 980tis. And I thought I was overdoing it!
Haven't had a good experience with SLI on my current 560tis, so I want one card to get the job done and last me a good couple years. Thanks for the suggestions.
I've always been a single-gpu gamer, but I wanted to try something else for a change.
Actually, a friend just purchased one and told me about this last night.FAO mkenyon, I don't know if you're aware that the Acer XB270HU does now support ULMB at 120 Hz, where previously it was limited to 100. Apparently revisions built since May have this ability.
Dunno if lack of 3D Vision still kills it for you, but there you go.
Is it setup like Eyefinity/NVSurround? Or is it the same picture on two screens?Well, the HTC Vive consists of two 1080x1200 screens each running at 90Hz. A single screen wouldn't be very demanding, but two of them would require a strong GPU. The Oculus Rift has the same resolution and refresh rate, they recommend a GTX 970 or R9 290 at the least. Not sure if you will actually end up using near 6GB of VRAM across the two screens unless you're playing at extremely high settings on the most demanding games.
If you have the money to spend, the GTX 980 Ti (or AMD Fury) would ensure that you could play at higher settings and framerate, if nothing else.
It renders each eye separately, because each eye is at a slightly different viewpoint, to give you a sense of depth.Is it setup like Eyefinity/NVSurround? Or is it the same picture on two screens?
Actually, a friend just purchased one and told me about this last night.
I'm not 100% sold on whether it's working correctly. I get the distinct feeling it may be skipping frames at that setting.
Is it setup like Eyefinity/NVSurround? Or is it the same picture on two screens?