Thank you for the answer! I just checked and a 950 would add another 6000 yens when I'm already 2-3000 over so I'm not too sure.
The remark about the G4400 is also duly noted but as I said I'm pretty sure I won't do any AAA gaming with that machine. Also, wouldn't buying a Skylake CPU+Mobo make it easy to upgrade down the line?
Last thing, there's something I totally forgot: I'm going to need a Wi-fi card in that thing. I looked for "Wifi PCI Card" and came up with
this, from Intel, best seller on Amazon.
I have absolutely no clue: am I supposed to plug that in the Mobo and it'll just work? Is it even the right thing or am I more looking for something like
that, with the antennas and all?
Thanks again!
Yep, sticking with Skylake is a good idea anyway, and the Pentium is more than enough for a lot of things
![Smile :) :)]()
There's no replacement for good per-core performance.
You probably can safely stick with the 750 Ti, since you're pretty over budget at this point.
You might want the latter one.
Hmm so for console visuals gaming @1080p@60hz, basically the "original" configuration (i5 6600 + 970/390) is the one which is more likely to achieve the goal I'm afraid...
Thanks to you, too!
Frame-rates can fluctuate a lot on modern titles, so thinking you'll get a constant 60fps will lead to disappointment.
Instead, you should get either a g-sync or freesync monitor (freesync is MUCH cheaper, so you'd need an AMD GPU).
That will result in a drastically better-than-console experience.
All right... though you can safely get an i5-6500, unless the 6600 is too cheap to pass up on.
As for the video card, what do you value more, less heat generation, absolute DX12 support (FL12_1), CPU-bound and DX11 performance, frame times (NVIDIA) or absolute performance (AMD)?
As for the monitor thing, depends on if he already has a monitor. One thing I've found is that I'm probably not too sensitive to temporary slight drops in frame rates or hitches, really, and maybe you are, too. G-sync and FreeSync are nice to have, but to be honest, I don't feel the need to get a better monitor yet with my GTX 970 and a bog-standard 60 Hz Philips IPS monitor.
I think I prefer a locked 60 over variable anything, really, and I'd happily drop settings. And the kicker: with a GTX 970 or R9 390, you probably won't need to end up using settings that look worse than what an Xbox One or PS4 would produce, for rather obvious reasons.
Not regarding awful ports, of course, but they can't be helped even with all the hardware. If you disregard them, locked 60 FPS with a 970/390 should be attainable without ending up with worse image quality than a PS4.
The 99th percentile frame time and "time spent beyond ...ms" charts over at TechReport should help a lot.