Is it true that with 4 sticks of DDR5 you lose performance on AM5? If so bye bye 64GB (16x4)
Is it true that with 4 sticks of DDR5 you lose performance on AM5? If so bye bye 64GB (16x4)
Thx for the info.No, if you have 4x16gb sticks it means they are running in dual rank mode. If you do 32gb modules x2 you'll get dual rank as well. If you do 2x16gb it'll always be single rank w/ DDR5. Either way you're limited on the IMC w/ the 7000 series. There's little chance of running higher than 6400mhz regardless on AM5 w/ the FCLK 1:1 (not decoupled). So if you wanted to run single rank w/ 2x16gb you wouldn't be able to get high enough DDR5 speeds to beat dual rank since the 7000 series IMC can't handle it. Regarding dual rank in lamen terms, it bring each channel to 64 bit from 32 bit.
If on Intel, you can reach 7600mhz+ single rank (32gb w/ 2x 16gb sticks) as the IMC is much better. It would take about 7200mhz dual rank to beat 7600mhz single rank, give or take. However, there are new 32GB module Hynix A-die chips which were just released a month ago that are dual rank (previous best for dual rank was Hynix M-die which maxed out around 6800mhz OC'ing) that are capable of reaching 7600mhz once tweaked. An example of said dies would be the new TeamGroup 6400mhz T-Create modules. Picked up a 64GB (2x32gb) set myself for my upcoming 4090 ITX build.
TLDR; For 7000 series on AM5, no it doesn't reduce performance since you can't go much higher than 6400mhz anyways due to IMC.
It's a great system, but very "value" inefficient. You're overpaying by like $600+ for a bunch of unnecessary stuff that won't have any real world impact on performance. You can get 10 year warrantied 1000W Gold ATX3.0 PSU's for like $160, like the Bequiet Pure Power 12M. You can get an entire 7700X, 32GB 6000, and a Mobo combo for the price of a 7800X3D by itself (which will have effectively no benefit on your 4K monitor). You can get $40-$60 coolers like the AK620 or Peerless Assassin that will significantly outperform the U12A. You could also save a sizable chunk switching to 2TB nvme's. The 2TB SN850X was $145 a couple days ago while the Solidigm (previously Intel) P44 Pro was $129. I can pretty much guarantee you're paying well over a $100 price premium for that single 4TB SN850X Vs. 2x 2TB's.Just about ready to pull the trigger on the build below. Not much has changed since my last post apart from switching the ASUS motherboard to an MSI motherboard. Heard that MSI is more reputable in that space and that ASUS quality isn't what it used to be.
Does the below build look okay? Always appreciative of the posts and info in this thread.
Monitor: 4k Resolution, not always looking to play at native resolution
Use cases: Gaming, browsing, pirating, general workhorse PC for the house that I'm hoping will last 10 years and more
- Case: Fractal North
- CPU: Ryzen 7800X3D
- CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U12A 2x120mm Heatsink
- MOBO: MSI PRO PRO X670-P
- Ram: 32GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz
- 4TB WD Black NVMe PCIe 4.0
- GPU: Nvidia RTX 4090
- PSU: aCorsair 1000 Watt 80 PLUS PLATINUM
Your psu isn't a concern, outside a 4090 it'll power everything fine and whatever nvidia releases next shouldn't use more power. I can't give you much more advice mainly because i'm not sure what cooling your going to use and what fits in that case, i'm not sure the evo 212 would be viable on one of the new amd 3d cpus but i havn't seen any cooling data on the evo on modern cpus so I could be wrong. The 7800x3d or 13700 would probably be the best bet from a longevity perspective, the 13700 might be a bit easier to cool if cooler size is a problem.Guys I have been looking to upgrade my PC for a while. Getting close to pulling the trigger and looking for feedback.
Current setup
7700k
RTX 3080
16GB DDR4
750w sfx PSU Corsair fully modular
Monitor(s) - 1440p
Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVMe
Basically I want to keep my ITX case, Monitors, SSD, PSU and GPU.
Want to get a new CPU, MOBO, DDR5 Ram (32 or 64 GB) and I will take the opportunity to upgrade my CPU cooler (currently with an Evo 212 classic).
My goal is to have a CPU/MOBO/RAM combo which will last me a long time and be ready to accept a GPU upgrade probably with the 5XXX series are released. I dont plan on going 4K really. I am fine w 1440p. Power draw is a concern as I dont feel like replacing my PSU. I am fine to undervolt any CPU. I dont have a preference re Intel or AMD, just want the best value for the money, keeping the longevity and power draw concerns in mind.
Your psu isn't a concern, outside a 4090 it'll power everything fine and whatever nvidia releases next shouldn't use more power. I can't give you much more advice mainly because i'm not sure what cooling your going to use and what fits in that case, i'm not sure the evo 212 would be viable on one of the new amd 3d cpus but i havn't seen any cooling data on the evo on modern cpus so I could be wrong. The 7800x3d or 13700 would probably be the best bet from a longevity perspective, the 13700 might be a bit easier to cool if cooler size is a problem.
If you plan on staying at 1440p, I would think that your current system would be more than adequate for a couple more years. What's the rush?Guys I have been looking to upgrade my PC for a while. Getting close to pulling the trigger and looking for feedback.
Current setup
7700k
RTX 3080
16GB DDR4
750w sfx PSU Corsair fully modular
Monitor(s) - 1440p
Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVMe
Basically I want to keep my ITX case, Monitors, SSD, PSU and GPU.
Want to get a new CPU, MOBO, DDR5 Ram (32 or 64 GB) and I will take the opportunity to upgrade my CPU cooler (currently with an Evo 212 classic).
My goal is to have a CPU/MOBO/RAM combo which will last me a long time and be ready to accept a GPU upgrade probably with the 5XXX series are released. I dont plan on going 4K really. I am fine w 1440p. Power draw is a concern as I dont feel like replacing my PSU. I am fine to undervolt any CPU. I dont have a preference re Intel or AMD, just want the best value for the money, keeping the longevity and power draw concerns in mind.
If you plan on staying at 1440p, I would think that your current system would be more than adequate for a couple more years. What's the rush?
If you plan on staying at 1440p, I would think that your current system would be more than adequate for a couple more years. What's the rush?
Ahhh, I misread the 7700k as a 7700x, see this is where it gets confusing!7700k is limiting as fuck in 2023 (even for 4k).
Would look into the Phantom Spirit SE (PS120 SE) instead. Not as well known Thermalright cooler but performs slightly better, with an extra heatpipe. Costs about the same as the Peerless Assassin for a few bucks more. Do be mindful that these are still quite tall at around 155cm tall so check if if will fit in your case.THanks Ya I feel the Evo needs to be replaced. Looking at the Thermalight Peerless Assassin which seems to be the recommended cost effective air cooler now.
Would look into the Phantom Spirit SE (PS120 SE) instead. Not as well known Thermalright cooler but performs slightly better, with an extra heatpipe. Costs about the same as the Peerless Assassin for a few bucks more. Do be mindful that these are still quite tall at around 155cm tall so check if if will fit in your case.
CPU depends.. if you want to best right now its the 7800X3D, for the best power to performance for gaming. Perfect for a smaller ITX system. $450 is quite steep though for a 8 core CPU however. Or you could go 7600X for now. Sell that and upgrade next year and get Zen 5 CPU which should be way faster all round.
Motherboard.. maybe look at getting B650 with good expandability. At least 32GB DDR5 6000 memory and the biggest Gen 4 SSD you can buy - that suits your budget.
The 7900X3D and 7950X3D are worse than the 7800X3D.Thanks Hinch. Ya I was looking at the 7800X3D. Given that the TDP is the same would be worth it to just go for the 7950X3D or 7900X3D for longevity reasons?
No probs. Depends if you're doing other things than light usage and gaming. Like video editing or other heavy load productivity work having more cores (>8) makes sense. If not, its hard to justify the extra cost for more cores since most games don't use more than 6 cores never mind 8 plus. And both largely perform the same in games. In future games we could see them using more, but I don't see a fast 8 core CPU 7800X3D being a bottleneck any time soon. That and the fast 3D-VCache are tied to one (of two) CCD's anyway so essentially the 7950X3D mostly uses half of the CPU (8 core) for gaming. And parks the other cores for use if the CCD is overloaded.Thanks Hinch. Ya I was looking at the 7800X3D. Given that the TDP is the same would be worth it to just go for the 7950X3D or 7900X3D for longevity reasons?
The 7900X3D and 7950X3D are worse than the 7800X3D.
With more cores though you can multitask a lot more while gaming. Personally I'd go with the 7800X3D for less hassle and cost. Spend the rest on GPU or storage capacity where you'd see the biggest difference.
I think the 4070ti is a great 1440p card and know a couple of people who are using it as such and are thrilled with it.Currently unsure if worth to upgrade pc and move away from consoles or wait incoming (for sure) midgen and move away later. Main thing is actually having my backlog only in 1 place and starting to find frustrating to always choose performance or image quality on consoles(both of them), and I've found that having all major console games coming to pc (even if after some time, and since I don't like cinematic games I don't really miss Sony fp on day1, i don't play them on ps5 neither)...
So now I'm sitting on a 5600x with 16gb 3600 ram and a 1tb nvme with a spare GPU (sold the 3080 when prices were crazy), I game at 1440p and have a freesync2 monitor. Looking around probably the best investment would be the 7900xt or the 4070ti (both around 800€ here in Italy, a bit worried vram side on Nvidia actually) but I've seen some 6950xt as low as 600€ and maybe that would be a better investment until proper next gen consoles? Probably would be nice to throw 16gb more or simply move to a 2 banks 32gb setup and sell the old one...
Any suggestion? Thanks.
Why Intel?Finally decided to upgrade my PC since my 10 year anniversary at work is coming up. Looking forward to playing with the new hardware (13th gen intel platform).
There's always something new around the corner and I wanted to go ahead and upgrade now. Plus it doesn't look like the refresh will be a huge deal and this will already be a big upgrade from what I have.Why Intel?
Hope you have a beefy PSU and AIO cooler....and cheap energy tariffs.
I was going to get a 13900K until I saw it needs a contact frame, AIO, and it can use up to 500W lmao.
Also, if you've waited this long for 13th gen you might as well have waited for14th genRaptor Lake Refresh which is coming in a few months.
You don't need an AIO for intel. Yes, they run hotter than AMD, but they're also designed to run about 10 degrees hotter, and won't throttle until you hit 100 degrees. A decent air cooler will have no problem keeping you under 85 or so. Mine rarely cracks 75.Why Intel?
Hope you have a beefy PSU and AIO cooler....and cheap energy tariffs.
I was going to get a 13900K until I saw it needs a contact frame, AIO, and it can use up to 500W lmao.
Also, if you've waited this long for 13th gen you might as well have waited for14th genRaptor Lake Refresh which is coming in a few months.
Yep I agree with you that he's overexaggerating things lolYou don't need an AIO for intel. Yes, they run hotter than AMD, but they're also designed to run about 10 degrees hotter, and won't throttle until you hit 100 degrees. A decent air cooler will have no problem keeping you under 85 or so. Mine rarely cracks 75.
Also nowhere close to 500W. A 13900K can theoretically pull up to 250W in all-core productivity tasks, which is a lot, but most of the time it won't be anywhere near that (and it's still a far cry from 500W).
There's no doubt Ryzen is far more power efficient. But you're wildly overstating the point.
AM5 voltages issues is solved already.There's always something new around the corner and I wanted to go ahead and upgrade now. Plus it doesn't look like the refresh will be a huge deal and this will already be a big upgrade from what I have.
I'll be going with the 13700k which shouldn't run as hot as the 13900k and didn't want to go with AM5 as the platform seems to be a mess at the moment with the voltage/bios stuff.
edit: actually, I cancelled my order. You do have some good points. Going to think about this a little more...
Raptor Lake refresh is not going to be very exciting, just a slight clock boost.Yep I agree with you that he's overexaggerating things lol
Still though, looks like I need to do some more thinking about AM5 now vs the raptor lake refresh...
This is not even slightly true of 13th gen intel. There's almost nothing to be gained from OC.With intel I had to spend hours with overclocking tests to get the max CPU performance.
You don't NEED an AIO but is pretty much required and yeah 500W is worst case scenario but Intel still runs hotter and uses more power.You don't need an AIO for intel. Yes, they run hotter than AMD, but they're also designed to run about 10 degrees hotter, and won't throttle until you hit 100 degrees. A decent air cooler will have no problem keeping you under 85 or so. Mine rarely cracks 75.
Also nowhere close to 500W. A 13900K can theoretically pull up to 250W in all-core productivity tasks, which is a lot, but most of the time it won't be anywhere near that (and it's still a far cry from 500W).
There's no doubt Ryzen is far more power efficient, and can run even with the shitty little stock cooler, which is awesome. But you're wildly overstating the point.
No it's not, dude. My system stays perfectly good with an air cooler, it doesn't get within 20 degrees of a throttle.You don't NEED an AIO but is pretty much required
500W is a no case scenario, that's not real. Even in a blender, it's like 250-275. Yes, they run about 10 degrees hotter, but they also throttle 10 degrees hotter, so this affects literally nothing, it's just a fanboy talking point.and yeah 500W is worst case scenario but Intel still runs hotter and uses more power.
So your AMD is hitting throttle limits with air cooling, while my i7-13700k is a full 35 degrees from throttle limits while running Cyberpunk maxed? Tell me more about your cooling expertise...I have a 250W rated air cooler for my 7950X3D and it can still hit 89C while pulling 155W.
I have a BeQuiet Dark Rock Pro 4 which is basically the same (a few degress difference) as a Noctua NHD15 (the best air cooler you can get).
This is not even slightly true of 13th gen intel. There's almost nothing to be gained from OC.
Oh yeah, that was one of those freakishly overclockable CPUs, like Sandy Bridge or Wolfdale. It's nothing like that now.thats great then. My last intel CPU was the 8700k and I could extract a good performance boost with OC, I thought the 13rd gen was still the same.
Not only that, but even when people do manage to pull off big overclocks with extreme cooling, the real world performance gains are NOT what you would think they would be. It doesn't just scale in a linear way.yeah with the new cpus everyone is trying to undervolt to get temps down lol
CPUs are pushed hard from the factory these days
A 4070 isn't going to face serious struggles until new consoles are out at a minimum.How future proof do you reckon a 4070 is? This year was a pretty brutal curbstomp to older hardware.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/campaigns/pc-game-bundle-diablo-iv-geforce-rtx-40-series/I'm strongly considering upgrading from my RTX 2060 to an RTX 4070 as there is currently a promotion where you get Diablo IV, I'm planning on getting the game anyway so it sort of brings the cost of the card down to £540. I was wondering if it would be worth it to add another 16GB of DDR4 RAM while I'm at it, the price for that is £52.97.
Is it worth it? I play at 1440p but do have a 4K TV hooked up to my PC for movies and TV shows, I also use the PC as a media server to stream to devices in the house so i'm thinking the extra RAM would be good for that although I'm not currently having any issues with that. Total cost for both would be £652.96.
any good atx3.0 PSUs yet?
dark power 13 getting mixed reviews.
dark power 13 pro coming soon.
kind of tempted to just tard out and get an ax1600i + some atx3.0 cables.
eh, still have mobos pushing out voltages higher than the specified value in the BIOS (e.g., 1.3v in the BIOS, but 1.35v measured).AM5 voltages issues is solved already.
2060 to 4070 is a massive upgrade. Assuming you don't have any other major bottlenecks, that would be well worth it.I'm strongly considering upgrading from my RTX 2060 to an RTX 4070 as there is currently a promotion where you get Diablo IV, I'm planning on getting the game anyway so it sort of brings the cost of the card down to £540. I was wondering if it would be worth it to add another 16GB of DDR4 RAM while I'm at it, the price for that is £52.97.
Is it worth it? I play at 1440p but do have a 4K TV hooked up to my PC for movies and TV shows, I also use the PC as a media server to stream to devices in the house so i'm thinking the extra RAM would be good for that although I'm not currently having any issues with that. Total cost for both would be £652.96.
I have an MSI one and it's great. Had it for about 5 months now. It's the MSI MPG A1000G PCIE5.any good atx3.0 PSUs yet?
dark power 13 getting mixed reviews.
dark power 13 pro coming soon.
kind of tempted to just tard out and get an ax1600i + some atx3.0 cables.
If you want the best gaming experience on the planet then yesIs the 3D in AMD 7800X3D really worth it in gaming?