FelixOrion
Poet Centuriate
Let's go get our boat back.
iirc, NK and the US have had sporadic talks of repatriating it peacefully, but obviously they don't go anywhere.
Let's go get our boat back.
Not to be his personal lawyer, but he didn't, or did I miss something? Why are you putting words in his mouth?
This was a weird thing to post.Ok. Exactly the same.
I mean, sure we spoke about the camps in NK, discussed them with the guide and the morality of it, I even mentioned them in the first post but thankfully expert NK GAF is here to reeducate me on my trip and that I'm wrong about everything, I didn't actually see or speak to anyone friendly and I'm literally Hitler, I spent my days laughing and drinking surrounded by inmates of camps, and even got a good ol'snapshot of a gas chamber.
Looks like sarcasm to me.
...read the thread. He didn't make the comparison. The comparison that was made by someone else was Pyongyang = Auschwitz, which is both incorrect and stupid to begin with because you're comparing a city to a concentration camp.
I can't imagine the mental gymnastics and lack of empathy someone would have to actually decide to visit that country and support their government financially.
which the OP seems to be under the impression that they do not exist or at least is downplaying
The only argument to be made, one I haven't seen the OP make yet (maybe I just missed it), is that it helps bring in news from the outside to the NK people. They see the cell phones, clothes and other amenities they don't get to enjoy and spread the word. I think there is some merit to this argument, but for me, it wouldn't outweigh the fact that I just directly gave the NK government my money.
Yep. That's exactly right. The camps don't exist. I mean, sure we spoke about the camps in NK, discussed them with the guide and the morality of it, I even mentioned them in the first post but thankfully expert NK GAF is here to reeducate me on my trip and that I'm wrong about everything, I didn't actually see or speak to anyone friendly and I'm literally Hitler, I spent my days laughing and drinking surrounded by inmates of camps, and even got a good ol'snapshot of a gas chamber.
I'm talking about people starving in the streets of Pyongyang, the capitol. The "good" part of north korea.
Because it happens.
Wouldn't soviet controlled East Berlin be a more appropriate comparison to Pyongyang?
OP why do you keep saying death camps dont exist in North Korea
The only argument to be made, one I haven't seen the OP make yet (maybe I just missed it), is that it helps bring in news from the outside to the NK people. They see the cell phones, clothes and other amenities they don't get to enjoy and spread the word. I think there is some merit to this argument, but for me, it wouldn't outweigh the fact that I just directly gave the NK government my money.
When the Red Cross inspected Theresienstadt, they walked away concluding that no war crimes were going on at these camps, and that life in them wasn't so bad, because they trotted out the healthiest prisoners and put on a truman show-like performance, while hiding the suffering and dying.
Which is exactly what the trip to Pyongyang is like.
The only argument to be made, one I haven't seen the OP make yet (maybe I just missed it), is that it helps bring in news from the outside to the NK people. They see the cell phones, clothes and other amenities they don't get to enjoy and spread the word. I think there is some merit to this argument, but for me, it wouldn't outweigh the fact that I just directly gave the NK government my money.
Ok show me where he says that (seriously).
The analogy might work if you compared it to North Korea as a whole, but not Pyongyang, which is where the "privileged" live.
The small "middle class" in Pyongyang is using (north korean) smartphones.
They see the cell phones, clothes and other amenities they don't get to enjoy and spread the word. I think there is some merit to this argument
And, again, in this "privileged" area, people still starve to death on the streets.
The only argument to be made, one I haven't seen the OP make yet (maybe I just missed it), is that it helps bring in news from the outside to the NK people. They see the cell phones, clothes and other amenities they don't get to enjoy and spread the word. I think there is some merit to this argument, but for me, it wouldn't outweigh the fact that I just directly gave the NK government my money.
As is the pretentiousness in all of yours sir.
You all need to take it down many notches. Mod said it was ok to discuss morals as long as you were respectful.
The small "middle class" in Pyongyang is using (north korean) smartphones. And that's from documentaries including non-controlled footage as well.
One thing about the money argument, I can't imagine it's a profitable venture for them. The amount they make from the tiny anount of tourism they see isn't going to make up for the resources spent, going by the pictures. It's probably more about propaganda rather than making money.
That's weird. A majority of political experts believe that food security in NK is adequate, yet stagnate. And there's dozens of political journals that don't show people starving in the streets. Even more from pedestrian tourists that don't show anything like this.
But I guess politicians and people who've actually been there don't actually know the truth.
And what food NK does need it has difficult importing because of international blockades that often specifically target foodstuffs for sanctioning. NK is pretty terrible on it's own without the UN committing a violation of human rights by literally attempting to starve them further.
The fact that he thinks the comparison is not apt just because he didn't see the camps himself.
So you're saying there's no moral argument to be made when visiting NK. Cool.
Hi, OP. I can understand the fascination with North Korea, I really do. But I would never visit, especially since I'd be directly supporting a regime with sickening human rights abuses. I don't think you're a bad guy, but I don't think you should be drinking their Kool-Aid so readily.
[citation needed]
Because he's comparing a CITY which is the most well off city in the country to the worst concentration camp in WW2. How are these even comparable? He's saying having a meal with a friendly NK guide is the same as eating meals next to starving jews while SS officers dine with me and taking photos of a monument is the same as a photo of a gas chamber after it was used.This was a weird thing to post.
This would be going better if you weren't so dazzled by the fake tour.
How is this so hard to understand. A user literally said "Pyongyang = Auschwitz". In reply to that he posted pictures of boys in Pyongyang and of starved boys from Auschwitz. One is a city of 4 million where the "privileged" north koreans live, the other a concentration camp of mass murder. How does that do anything to relativize NKs concentration camps? He NEVER said they don't exist, they are not as bad or anything like that at all.
...oh. Ok then.I love NK.
The point of SpaceWolf's post was the North Korea has labor and death camps, with horrible human rights abuses which the OP seems to be under the impression that they do not exist or at least is downplaying
Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea 1st Edition
and this guy mentions it as well: http://nextshark.com/michal-huniewicz-north-korea-trip
There's nothing in either of these links about starvation in Pyongyang.
Every country commits human rights abuses. The things that North Korea does to it's people? Apple/Samsung/etc does to the North African miners. Apple/Samsung/etc do the laborers to assemble the products you use.
The OP literally was in a Truman show-esque world - completely manufactured and produced.
And, again, in this "privileged" area, people still starve to death on the streets. Pyongyang is still incredibly fucked up, he only saw the clean part of Pyongyang. What he saw is not the typical life in Pyongyang.
Every country commits human rights abuses. The things that North Korea does to it's people? Apple/Samsung/etc does to the North African miners. Apple/Samsung/etc do the laborers to assemble the products you use.
The OP literally was in a Truman show-esque world - completely manufactured and produced. He says it wasn't, but it was
felt also scripted you could tell pretty easily.
Like I said, the fake parts are very fake.
There's no mention of Pyongyang specifically in this link, nor is there any mention of the word "starvation", yet when you look specifically for "food" it details the farming process for Pyongyang people.
You: One arguement to be made is that by seeing foreigners they see stuff like smartphones etc they usually never see.
Me: middle-class in Pyongyang does actually have smartphones so it's not new to them technically
You: So there's nothing wrong morally with visiting NK??????
HOW do you seriously make this connection?
Honestly, I've had enough. So much piling on and twisting shit. I'm out.
When the Red Cross inspected Theresienstadt, they walked away concluding that no war crimes were going on at these camps, and that life in them wasn't so bad, because they trotted out the healthiest prisoners and put on a truman show-like performance, while hiding the suffering and dying.
Which is exactly what the trip to Pyongyang is like.
How is this so hard to understand. A user literally said "Pyongyang = Auschwitz". In reply to that he posted pictures of boys in Pyongyang and of starved boys from Auschwitz. One is a city of 4 million where the "privileged" north koreans live, the other a concentration camp of mass murder. How does that do anything to relativize NKs concentration camps? He NEVER said they don't exist, they are not as bad or anything like that at all.
I mean, not to downplay the severity of your first statement or compare the treatment of HK incarceration, but your latter statement definitely has some hard numbers that you may not want to marginalize.OP did you know that there may be rape in those camps?
Unlike, say, America, where Prison is almost like a vacation.
wiki said:Prison rape in the United States
In 2001, Human Rights Watch estimated that at least 140,000 inmates had been raped while incarcerated. A United States Department of Justice report, Sexual Victimization in Prisons and Jails Reported by Inmates, states that "In 2011-12, an estimated 4.0% of state and federal prison inmates and 3.2% of jail inmates reported experiencing one or more incidents of sexual victimization by another inmate or facility staff in the past 12 months or since admission to the facility, if less than 12 months." However, advocates dispute the accuracy of the numbers, saying they seem to under-report the real numbers of sexual assaults in prison, especially among juveniles.