Metalman96
Member
Game optimization has been dogshit the last few years. Some of these games are genuinely fun, but what does it matter if they run like this?
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Immortals of Aveum cannot run at Native 4K/60fps on NVIDIA RTX 4090, even on Low Settings (drop to 34FPS)
- Thread starter KyoZz
- Start date
Puscifer
Member
I truly believe that COVID fast forwarded a lot of people into different industries, not just service like they say, for better or worse. We're seeing a lack of talent in a lot of places right now and I think it's just visible in video games right now.
Last edited:
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
And Hollywood.
Justin9mm
Member
The difference back then was that the games were usually good lol
Wishmaster92
Member
What a surprise that nanite scales horribly the higher the resolution is hence the tsr fsr image smearing bullshit. Combine that with virtual shadow maps, nanite reflections (rt reflections?) and lumen global illumination. It’s no wonder that not even the most powerful card out right now can run this game at native 4k properly. Does this game even support virtual textures? It doesn’t seem to have that movie asset quality that remnant 2 has.
HeisenbergFX4
Gold Member
Yeah I don't want to play this game but I want more power as I can see this being a trend sadly.When you buy a 5090ti to play Immortals of aveum at native 4k120fps but then realize you have to play immortals of aveum:
Fbh
Gold Member
UE5 so far is the engine to destroy performance and resolution for the sake of marginally better graphics
So devs can make games on UE6 with slightly better graphics, still based on Ps3-4 era gameplay and still 720p
So devs can make games on UE6 with slightly better graphics, still based on Ps3-4 era gameplay and still 720p
Patrick S.
Banned
RTX 5000 Series are going to need to support SLI again, at this rate.
Fabieter
Member
Modern gaming has its downside but damn we had alot of trash games 20 years ago as well. Nostalgic is hell of a drug. Imo average gaming quality is higher than it ever was.
Patrick S.
Banned
Seriously. In my mind, the original Painkiller game looked better than this.Good, it's time we stopped embracing cross gen and for someone to make a graphics powerhouse that will be the benchmark for future games like Crysis was in the past!
*sees screenshots*
O...o...Oh... Nevermind.
Patrick S.
Banned
I don't think this is entirely true.
More like, in the past you had 30 games coming out every year, and 15 of them were bomba games.
Now you have 3000 games coming out every year, and 15 of them are bomba games.
Last edited:
Fabieter
Member
So on average game quality is higher than it was in the past.
Patrick S.
Banned
That's... not how math works.
Edit: With bomba I mean an awesome game, not a game that bombs
Last edited:
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
Garbage. Sorry but I'm not seeing it with my eyes as to why this should penalize HW this much. A 1700USD+ GPU should bake this game.
cinnamonandgravy
Member
and the cool thing about painkiller was it kicked ass.
Patrick S.
Banned
Yeah, in fact, I'm gonna reinstall it now
Fabieter
Member
That's... not how math works.
Edit: With bomba I mean an awesome game, not a game that bombs
Well its like % works but sure if you didnt talk about quality than it is meaningless.
REDRZA MWS
Member
Sounds straight up ridiculous to me. It’s a weird cartoon looking sorcerer game. A 4090?? Devs better tighten their shit up.
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
Looking like a PS3 game or honestly some hot garbage. Series S needs to go by the wayside.
U n i o n 0015
Member
Left for industries that pay well and don't run you into the ground maybe?
MrTroubleMaker
Member
U n i o n 0015
Member
I kept rubbing my eyes during this video. YouTube is saying 4k60 but this looks like 480p.
yamaci17
Member
at least you get 60 FPS. I wonder if there's a 30 FPS mode that targets some decent resolution
edit: there isn't
Last edited:
Sleepwalker
Member
I was accidentally watching it on my phone in 480p resolution, switched to 4k and it looked the same
yamaci17
Member
if ps5 pro becomes an actual thing, you know that developers will target 700-800p dynamic 30 fps on ps5 on ue5 gamesI was accidentally watching it on my phone in 480p resolution, switched to 4k and it looked the same
that will become brutal for Series S. that means you will have to be content with that 400p 500p image AT 30 FPS at that point
I think UE5 needs some major overhauls. this cannot really go on. they release these games as "front runner" scape goats so that games that will actually be decent but still run badly similar to this will get a pass because of it being a "frequent occurence by then".
people dismiss how badly UE5 runs because the game is bad. but I think these are games that are stragetically released to "soften" people against the incoming unoptimized games.
Last edited:
Sleepwalker
Member
UE5 is definitely out of control, these games don't look anywhere near as good as they should to justify the performance penalty.
dotnotbot
Member
Early Xbox One vibes. What's even worse than blurry look and aliasing for me is a huge amount of atrocious FSR artifacts.
Last edited:
Fbh
Gold Member
LOL holy shit.
While the graphics are obviously better the actual image quality reminds me of The Witcher 3 on Switch
kuncol02
Banned
How dare you! Painkiller looks much better. Immortals looks like AI generated screenshot of fake game with zero style and cohesion.
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
People laughed at me when I said Doom Eternal looks better, and as we’re seeing runs insanely better. This game looks generic, and runs like total garbage.
I wish there was some competition among game engines instead of the Unreal monopoly.
I wish there was some competition among game engines instead of the Unreal monopoly.
Last edited:
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Insane Metal
Member
Holy shit that's almost CP2077 on XBO bad. I mean, the graphics, not the performance.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
The performance on Series S is pretty good going by his latest video, sacrifices withstanding of course.
PS5 seems to be running at a higher average resolution compared to SX but as a result it suffers in performance pretty notably.
Insane Metal
Member
Ouch.The performance on Series S is pretty good going by his latest video, sacrifices withstanding of course.
PS5 seems to be running at a higher average resolution compared to SX but as a result it suffers in performance pretty notably.
Wheres the video plse?
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
U n i o n 0015
Member
The performance on Series S is pretty good going by his latest video, sacrifices withstanding of course.
PS5 seems to be running at a higher average resolution compared to SX but as a result it suffers in performance pretty notably.
I'm almost always in the framerate > visuals department but this is crazy. The resolution is waaaay too low to be appealing.
Insane Metal
Member
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Series S doing a great job here lmao
What am I even looking at here lol, poop coming out of a butt ?
All the console versions seem to be running the game with some real heavy upscaling from very low resolutions. Probably looks better in motion, but in stills, the game does not look flattering at all.
Insane Metal
Member
That's some kind of space ship coming out from a planet in the background. You can't even see the ship on the S lol. The lights are all fucked up.
Zathalus
Member
Better then playing at 720p. You would think console games would improve over games released back in 2005.
Last edited: