This story is pretty complicated so bear with me. In short, there's a landfill in St Louis that definitely contains *some* radioactive waste that was dumped illegally. The company that now owns the land opted to contain it on-site instead of removing it. It's actually super unclear exactly how severe the radioactive contamination is. For sure, the "containment" is totally insufficient. So that's bad alone.
Also, there's another landfill nearby that is perpetually on fire underground. The burning landfill is a problem in its own right. Further complicating the issue, the fire may be moving toward the landfill with the nuclear waste.
Couple articles to start with: St. Louis burning: A ticking time bomb beneath the city? & State consultant says Bridgeton Landfill fire spreading north
Excerpts from the Al Jazeera piece:
On the fire at the non-nuclear landfill:
Also, there's another landfill nearby that is perpetually on fire underground. The burning landfill is a problem in its own right. Further complicating the issue, the fire may be moving toward the landfill with the nuclear waste.
Couple articles to start with: St. Louis burning: A ticking time bomb beneath the city? & State consultant says Bridgeton Landfill fire spreading north
Excerpts from the Al Jazeera piece:
Chapman lives near the West Lake Landfill, a site located in the heart of metropolitan St. Louis that increasingly appears to have a much more ominous past than many thought. Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services data from 2014 has also shown increased rates of rare cancers near the site.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission recommended the waste be removed in 1988, but the company that now owns the land has — with EPA approval — opted for containment as opposed to removal, maintaining that the waste there is low-level when it comes to radioactivity, and not a threat to public health.
But it may not be that simple. Government documents unearthed by residents suggest that the extent of the contamination may be far worse — perhaps at an unprecedented level, some experts say. Following a largely broken or incomplete paper trail, residents and activists have found evidence that there may be soil laced with uranium, thorium and radium buried there.
And there is another problem: the fire. It smolders underneath an adjacent landfill, burning at some 300 degrees and slowly moving toward where the waste is thought to be.
Nobody is quite sure what will happen if the two meet, but locals and the county are preparing for the worst: a nuclear emergency in the middle of St. Louis.
The landfill has no lining between it and the groundwater, nor is the top covered. The landfill is in the floodplain of the Missouri River, and several tornadoes have come very close to the site in recent years.
All that separates the landfill from the public street is a chain-linked fence marked with signs. Some residents sarcastically call it the “magical fence” that is meant to keep them safe.
The zip codes near West Lake were part of the 2014 Missouri Department of Health study that found statistically significant higher rates of cancer in North County. Specifically, there was a higher rate of childhood brain cancer in the two zip codes near the landfill. Statistically, there should have only been two or three cases. The study found seven.
Within a few miles of the landfill are thousands of residents, an industrial area, schools and a hospital. In 2013, Peter Anderson, executive director of the nonprofit Center for a Competitive Waste Industry, likened the potential release of radioactive particles into St. Louis’ air as a “dirty bomb” that could impact a 10-mile radius of the landfill. Residential areas begin less than half a mile from the site. Nearly 3 million people live in the greater St. Louis metropolitan area.
On the fire at the non-nuclear landfill:
One thing is for certain: around 2012, residents who lived near the landfill started noticing a potent odor, likely the product of the fire burning through the landfill. [...]
However, in March, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources notified Republic Services that it had violated state law regarding the management of the Bridgeton Landfill, writing that “analysis continued to show that emissions of [sulfur dioxide] exceeded levels as considered in the landfill’s permits.” Later that month, the department, in another letter, said that sulfur dioxide emissions exceeded the annual 250 tons allowed under Republic Service’s permits.
Short-term exposure to sulfur dioxide, according to the EPA, is linked to respiratory illness, bronchoconstriction and asthma.