Indiana to allow schools to replace teaching cursive with typing

Status
Not open for further replies.
We should still be taught to read cursive for historical reasons IMO. But no need to waste time learning how to write it.
 
FINALLY. Cursive is pointless and typing takes up too much time in a high school setting. This is fantastic news.
 
Typing is honestly more important in today's world than cursive. They shouldn't completely replace cursive, maybe just dramatically cut back the number of classes for it and make the rest of them into typing classes.
 
Sharp said:
We should still be taught to read cursive for historical reasons IMO. But no need to waste time learning how to write it.

really? maybe when i close on my house they'll accept for me to print my name... or type it.. wtf.
 
Cursive is a waste of time in today's world. I stopped writing in cursive in elementary school and never wrote another word (except my sig). And god DAMN do I hate trying to read some people's sloppy scrawls.
 
I haven't written in cursive since I learned it. I can still do it easily. Take that capital Q!
 
aronnov reborn said:
really? maybe when i close on my house they'll accept for me to print my name... or type it.. wtf.
Most people's signatures don't look anything like their names anyway.
mclem said:
Shorthand's faster still.
This. There are much more useful things you can learn if your goal is to take notes quickly.
 
terminallyChill said:
It's not particularly difficult or time-consuming to learn both.

"Learning both" and "learning how to write in cursive quickly and neatly" are two different things.

I still remember having to miss recess in 2nd grade to write pages of cursive letters since it took me forever to copy them semi-neatly. And it still looked worse than what someone could do in 5 minutes.

My printing on the other hand is pretty decent.
 
Cursive is bullshit without enforcing legibility.

Trying to read most people's cursive writing is like deciphering hieroglyphs.

I can't even read my own half the time.
 
Good. My daughter has great cursive writing, but I'm having a hard time getting her to learn typing. Cursive is just not a relevant skill.

Bad_Boy said:
i only use cursive to sign my name.
Same.
 
I don't think cursive is unimportant, but in general it is fair to say that cursive is harder to read than printing or type. So just that right there should make you question its validity. Cursive should be an optional side dish more in line with calligraphy and art, rather than the way its taught today.

I learned cursive on those giant shitty thin brown pieces of paper with HUGE lines that are cut in half so you can easily make the distinction between lower case and upper case. I ALSO learned to to type in school. Can you guess which skill is infinitely more valuable to me in my adult life?
 
Bad_Boy said:
i only use cursive to sign my name.
That's the only cursive 99% of the population ever do. Teach them how to sign their names and move on to typing.

Better yet, let's go back to making an X as a legal signature. lol.
 
AbsoluteZero said:
What bullshit. Cursive/Script is an important thing to learn.


AbsoluteZero said:
Whenever you need to write something its SO MUCH FASTER.

Typing is faster, and most cursive is illegible. Whenever I take notes in class I either write EXTREMELY truncated notes by hand, or I fall back on cursive. Whenever I do that, I slow down when reading it back.

Typing is better.

Which is a shame, really, because my parents have different, beautiful styles of cursive, but its time has passed.
 
I disagree with this completely...but its not at all surprising.
 
Last time i used cursive was 7th grade. I think perhaps a week or two should be spent on cursive, that way, students can still be able to do signatures in the future.
 
terminallyChill said:
It's not particularly difficult or time-consuming to learn both.

Yeah it is. Teachers are hard pressed for what to teach, and it takes forever to teach the kids cursive. Basically reteaching them how to write for two years.

After the fourth grade, I have only used cursive in my signature (which is really more of a scribble), and the agreement on some standardized tests.

Fucking capital G slowed me down for a minute on some test I was taking.
 
I'm surprised that this is coming from my state!

But honestly, why not both? There is so much time in the school day at the age that they teach cursive and a lot of it is filler (from what I remember).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom