As someone who is actually required to teach cursive, I want to chime in.
I don't understand why they wouldn't teach it anymore. It's really not that time intensive. When I've taught third grade, which is when most kids in CA have to learn it, I would say on average I spent no more than 15 to 20 minutes daily going over handwriting, which is just about the same amount of time I spend in 2nd grade working on decent penmanship. There's no guarantee we'd even do it every day, and I usually started in the winter after the kids have gotten adjusted back to the school routine. If things look really atrocious though I'm sending a little extra home for homework.
By the end of the year my kids have always been able to write legibly enough for me to comprehend what they're trying to communicate (nevermind spelling errors), and I've yet to hear complaints from their teachers the following year about how terrible their handwriting is.
So if I can manage to get it done within a half of a school year without spending enormous amounts of time on it, and lord knows I'm not the world's greatest teacher by any stretch of the imagination, why is Indiana so determined to not bother with it any more?
So within the span of one school year, they're done, they've learned it, they can read it, how many more man hours need to go into it other than some quick review in the future? Maybe you need to do a bit of drill and kill if things look sloppy across the board, but that's about it. I know a lot of upper grade teachers (in my experience) tend to write everything in cursive in the classroom to keep it all fresh in their heads.
Plus, our district has them start learning basic typing in 4th through 6th so they're ready for junior high.
Eliminating cursive altogether just seems far too drastic.